Martin A. McCloskey

Martin A. McCloskey

also known as McCloskey Law Office

2.3
Rating: 6.6

Licensed for 19 years

Family Lawyer at Elkhart, IN
Practice Areas: Family, Criminal Defense, Litigation

500 N Nappanee Street, Suite 1A, Elkhart, IN

About Martin

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Family 60%

Family Law including, but no limited to Divorce, Paternity, Child Custody, Parenting Time, Child Support, Guardianships, Adoptions, Protective Orders, Contesting Protective Orders, Wills, Estates and Probate.

18 years

60%
Criminal Defense 25%

Criminal Defense including most Felonies and Misdemeanors, Constitutional Violations, and other legal issues.

18 years

25%
Litigation 15%

Civil Litigation including, but not limited to Automobile Accidents, Personal Injury, Constitutional Violations, Breach of Contract, Protective Orders, Contesting Protective Orders, Wills, Estates and Probate.

18 years

15%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Indiana for 19 years

State: Indiana

Acquired: 2006

Active in Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2012

Location

McCloskey Law Office

500 N Nappanee Street, Suite 1A, Elkhart, IN, 46514

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Martin A. McCloskey's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

2.3 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Posted by anonymous | May 14, 2024 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Very uninvolved in the entire process

Martin is personable and professional until you pay a retainer and then loses all interest in the case. I was required to negotiate on my own behalf while Martin sat to the side offering more support to the other party than he did for me. The entire office lacked the ability to relay messages or pr...ovide any coherent response to questions. Information or documents provided were filed but were never reviewed or referenced during any meetings. I hired Martin for a Family Law matter and if this is all the effort he puts into his cases I would highly recommend that you represent yourself since you will already be doing alk the work.. It definitely would have turned out much better for myself as the legal result would have been the same and I would have saved the cost of a significant retainer.

Posted by Amy Mishler | June 22, 2023 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Great Lawyer

Marty is very efficient and proactive in getting the job done ! He fights above and beyond to represent his clients ! 5 Stars ⭐️

Posted by anonymous | November 20, 2022 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Would not recommend

Hiring this attorney was a huge waste of time and money. He was very unorganized during our multiple hearings. I provided multiple supporting documents that were never reviewed or referenced. I was left in worse shape than I started after hiring this attorney. I AM INDEED A FORMER UNSATISFIED CLIENT ...AND AM ALLOWED TO VOICE MY SINCERE OPINION DESPITE DISAGREEING VIEWS FROM SAID ATTORNEY.

Posted by Erin | July 19, 2022 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Go with your gut

Female (me)... First time hiring a lawyer to assist with a family law case already underway. 1. In person meeting on a Wednesday. I paid the retainer. He said he would file his appearance by the end of the week. Roughly two weeks later that happened. 2. In the same meeting I provided to him rel...evant and organized documentation. MM stated we could try and go for child support back to birth. 3. I left work early on a prearranged day to sign documents for court. None are ready. 4. I asked if we would have a meeting prior to court to go over what I was looking for or if there was any information he or I needed to know. That didn't happen. 5. I was emailed about 1.5 months prior to a hearing that was set for an afternoon time. MM Law Office informed me there was a conflict at that time and were hoping to get it moved earlier in the day. They said they would let me know. I emailed 2 weeks later asking for the status. We'll let you know. I called 2 weeks later. We'll let you know. I emailed 3 weeks later on a Monday morning, received a call at about 4:15pm from MM on Tuesday asking if I was ready for the hearing Wednesday morning. Me: What hearing? MM: You didn't get an email? Me: Nope. I did try to get the information three different times by email or phone on these specific dates. MM: In a family law case, we give information once we receive it, not when someone emails or calls in asking for it. 6. During that same phone call, MM mentioned he received some documentation from the other party. 2 minutes after ending the phone call, I called him back and asked for that information to be emailed to me. MM stated he was very busy with other cases. He did end up sending it. 7. Hearing day... Negotiations were attempted. MM and I didn't have a discussion on potential outcomes or scenarios prior to the hearing which didn't provide a strong foundation for me. He made a couple statements: "I didn't know there wasn't a child support order in place." Also "no we can't get child support going back to birth, only to the date of filing." See note 2 above. 8. There was a particular situation that happened after the hearing. I emailed MM. I received a response that was very informative and helpful, which was the only time I felt this way throughout the 3 months. 9. I asked for my client/attorney contract/agreement a few times (emails and a phone call) after the hearing. I also asked about invoices since none had been sent since he was hired. One time I was able to talk to his assistant and she told him what I was asking for. I didn't receive the contract. I was told invoicing may be ready in another week or two. 10. I emailed MM to request his withdrawal from my case. I called 30 hours after the email due to no response, spoke to MM, and verbally gave my request, resending the email. Though it’s likely not required, no confirmation of the withdrawal was sent. Two weeks later, no invoice still (3 months since hired). I’m a single mother, single income. I didn’t want to be caught unaware, but I was. I go into his office and ask for an invoice. "Oh, you didn't get an invoice?" They print out an invoice and it's about $1k more dollars I owe. Since there's a lien on my file, I was told I would have to set up an appointment, to get the agreement I had asked for multiple times, as he said he was not my lawyer anymore and he had pressing things to get to. One week later, I receive it by email. TLDR; My expectations of what I was paying for (communication - taking time to learn about the case, discuss the case, discuss best and worst case scenarios, making the client feel like they are getting their money's worth, having a healthy rapport... And transparency.... Meaning adequate and consistent invoicing of expenses/fees) did not align with reality. Go with your gut. The lessons that life throws at you are opportunities for growth and awareness.

See All Client Reviews

Martin A. McCloskey's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Martin
Nick Artusi headshot
Nick Artusi

Family lawyer | Mar 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Nancy Ann McCaslin headshot
Nancy McCaslin

Unknown lawyer

James Lee McCaslin headshot
James McCaslin

Unknown lawyer

Rebecca Butler Power headshot
Rebecca Power

Unknown lawyer

Lisa Marie Gilkey Schoetzow headshot
Lisa Schoetzow

Unknown lawyer

Michael Jay Yoder headshot
Michael Yoder

Unknown lawyer

Jay A. Lauer headshot
Jay Lauer

Unknown lawyer

Brian Kent Lakey headshot
Brian Lakey

Unknown lawyer

Robert Eugene Canfield headshot
Robert Canfield

Family lawyer

Nick Artusi headshot
Nick Artusi

Family lawyer

Beverly Sue Peters headshot
Beverly Peters

Family lawyer

Thomas S. Wilson Jr. headshot
Thomas Wilson

Criminal defense lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.6 (Good)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2012.

Public Reprimand issued in IN, 2012

updated on 03/12/2019

A reprimand means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The State gives the lawyer a public reprimand in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.

Martin’s comment:

“Regarding the public reprimand cited in 2012 from a November 2007 retainer agreement. Attorney McCloskey was disciplined for the use of the language "non-refundable retainer" as opposed to a "flat fee" or "refundable retainer." A retainer is a deposit towards services and must be earned. A flat fee agreement is an agreement to perform services for an agreed fee. Attorney McCloskey has adjusted all language in retainer agreements to clarify and separate retainer and flat fee agreements.”

Work Experience

2006 - Present

Attorney, McCloskey Law Office

Associations

2006 - Present

St. Joseph County Bar Association

Member

2006 - Present

Indiana State Bar Association

Member

2006 - Present

Elkhart City Bar Association

Member

Education

2006

Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School

Juris Doctor (J.D.)

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2012
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution