Brooks Richard Siegel

I would not retain this firm again and would advise prospective clients to carefully evaluate their expectations regarding communication, responsiveness, and client support. From the outset, there were avoidable issues. During the initial intake process, I was disconnected/hung up on, and a schedu...led intake meeting was later missed without prior notice, follow-up, or explanation. These issues were not addressed proactively and set the tone for the remainder of the representation. Throughout the case, routine and reasonable questions frequently required multiple follow-ups over extended periods to receive a response, if a response was received at all. Phone calls routinely went unanswered and were not returned. Written messages were read without reply. When responses were provided, they were often brief, dismissive, or argumentative rather than explanatory. Early in the process, I was provided information regarding my rights that later proved to be inaccurate. When clarification was requested, the response was argumentative rather than corrective. Escalation to the attorney did not resolve these concerns. The interaction felt rushed and did not provide meaningful guidance, leaving important questions unanswered. There were also delays in handling reaffirmation-related matters, which required additional follow-up on my part to ensure the issue was addressed at all. These delays contributed to unnecessary uncertainty late in the process and reinforced the broader pattern of reactive rather than proactive case management. Additionally, motions were filed in my case without any notice or explanation to me. The only way I became aware of these filings was by independently monitoring the docket through PACER. Clients should not have to discover court activity in their own case through self-monitoring to stay informed. Communication appeared inconsistent and uneven. Billing-related matters were addressed promptly, while substantive case-related questions, filings, and procedural concerns often were not. As a result, I was left to independently determine and confirm basic procedural timelines and expectations that should reasonably have been explained during representation. Despite repeated attempts to engage, communication did not improve. The cumulative effect of missed appointments, delayed responses, lack of notice regarding filings, reaffirmation delays, and dismissive interactions significantly increased the stress of an already difficult legal process. While the legal outcome itself may be routine, the experience reflected systemic deficiencies in communication, professionalism, and client management. Clients who value timely updates, accurate guidance, and transparent communication may wish to consider other firms before retaining this one.

I recommend that you not do it as Per Se or on your own as I intended however after speaking with Mr. Brooks he assured me the process was more than just paperwork. I trusted him and he really did an exceptionally awesome job for me. Mr. Brooks assigned Danay Machado Senior Paralegal who listened and... explained the process. I was very upset because I should not be in this position being railroaded Tudor Cay Condominium Association. However it was nothing the law firm could do about that but as lawyer representing me. It was the best possible outcome. My credit score increased significantly afterwards. I must also mention Anoinet who is just great. I thank all of you who took care of me while dealing with this emotional mess. It is a tough thing to deal with but Totally worth the small fee to hire Mr. Brooks and his team. Thank you so much.

Attorney Siegel, I am writing to express my heartfelt gratitude for the exceptional professionalism and expertise you demonstrated during our recent consultation. Your ability to explain complex matters with clarity and patience is truly commendable. Your dedication to my case and the thoughtful a...dvice you offered are deeply appreciated.

Please do not go to this law firm. They're liars, and absolutely no communication. Their paralegal, Mayra is rude, disrespectful and has no idea how to communicate with the clientele that she's supposed to represent. After receiving my discharge, I still had creditors hounding me, because the fir...m did not do their due diligence. They put it back on me like I did something wrong. I got one of the creditors on the phone with the firm and of course she said that some there was still outstanding paperwork needed. The firm told me not to worry about anything and they'd take care of it. Fast forward 90 days and I'm still receiving bills saying that I still had an un paid balance. At this point I am beyond upset. Finally after receiving a call from Brooks himself, which happened on 3 occasions, which was to cover for their incompetency. Again absolutely no communication whatsoever. Then he tries telling me that they did what they were supposed to do and gave me some lawyer BS. Going through a bankruptcy is hard enough. But please save yourself some grief and CHOOSE ANOTHER ATTORNEY!

Stay away he hold me hostage with my case against Nissan for 5 months and counting he won't go forward even after Nissan approved the stelment and agreed to pay him his fee because I won't sign my part of the stelment to him . And I refused to do that because he tried to make sign a paper that said I... have to pay him more than half off my money, he blocked me ( phone and email ) so I can't fire him, him and the lemon law group are scammer. Almost all the good reviews has only first name that means they are fake