Daniel Carl Pierron

Daniel Carl Pierron

5.0
Rating: 7.6

Licensed for 14 years

Patent application Lawyer at Melbourne, FL
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Intellectual Property, Patent Infringement, Privacy

1990 W. New Haven Ave., Ste. 201, Melbourne, FL

About Daniel

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Patent Application 60%

All aspects of patent preparation and prosecution in various technology areas, including OCT, catheters, stents, lighting devices, LEDs, software, business methods, and mechanical systems.

17 years | 350 cases

60%
Intellectual Property 20%

Providing legal services for all types of IP, including procurement and enforcement of trademarks and copyright.

15 years | 30 cases

20%
Patent Infringement 10%

Patent infringement analysis and deposition analysis.

15 years | 10 cases

10%
Privacy 10%

Advising clients regarding relevant sectoral data privacy laws and regulations. Developing policies and procedures.

9 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 15 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 350-350 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Florida for 13 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 2012

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois for 14 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 2011

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Widerman Malek, P.L.

1990 W. New Haven Ave., Ste. 201, Melbourne, FL, 32940

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Daniel Carl Pierron's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Professionalism

Posted by Greg | July 01, 2013 | Intellectual Property

Review Daniel Carl Pierron

Dan is our local patent counsel and has played a key role in drafting and prosecuting patent applications for our firm. Dan has broad technical knowledge and ability to quickly grasp inventive concepts and contribute to the development of a robust disclosure by drawing out additional concepts. Thi...s coupled with his ability to timely prepare quality patent applications and prosecute them to insure the broadest coverage provides great service and value proposition to the firm. Am very pleased with Dan's work product and would gladly recommend his services as patent attorney to others.

See All Client Reviews

Daniel Carl Pierron's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Daniel
Donald Blake Buchanan headshot
Donald Buchanan

Intellectual property lawyer | May 20

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I worked with Dan early in my career and he is one of the most talented and hard working attorneys I have come across. He not only took the time to help train me in patent prosecution, he delivered high quality IP protection to his clients at the same time. I endorse this lawyer."

Mark Robert Mohler headshot
Mark Mohler

Patent application lawyer | Nov 05

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Daniel has great experience and seasoned perspective."

Mark Raafat Malek headshot
Mark Malek

Intellectual property lawyer | Jul 01

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Stephen Bullock headshot
Stephen Bullock

Patent application lawyer

John Peter Paredes headshot
John Paredes

Intellectual property lawyer

Andrew Burton Pickett headshot
Andrew Pickett

Personal injury lawyer

William Arthur Harding headshot
William Harding

Unknown lawyer

Aaron Behar Thalwitzer headshot
Aaron Thalwitzer

Unknown lawyer

Mark Raafat Malek headshot
Mark Malek

Patent application lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.6 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2018 - Present

Partner, Patent and Data Privacy Attorney, Widerman Malek, PL

2012 - 2017

Associate Patent Attorney, Widerman Malek, P.L.

2009 - 2012

Patnet Agent/Attorney, Rosebaum IP

Associations

2012 - Present

March of Dimes Space Coast Division

Board Member, Nominating Chair

2012 - Present

AIPLA

Member

2012 - Present

Brevard County Bar Association

Member

2014 - 2015

Women's Business Center at FIT

Board of Directors

2014 - 2016

Space Coast Tech Council

Chair, Business Support Services Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

Issued Patent for Lighting Science Group Corp.

Issued

Issued Patent

Issued

See More Legal Cases

Education

2011

Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology

JD - Juris Doctor

2008

University of Kansas

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

N/A

VMB

IP and Small Business

Publications

2015

Space Coast Business Magazine Employees and Inventorship

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution