Christopher Lane Rouse

Christopher Lane Rouse

3.8
Rating: 6.6

Licensed for 33 years

Litigation Lawyer at Savannah, GA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Social Security

602 Montgomery Street, Savannah, GA

About Christopher

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Litigation 50%

Extensive litigation practice in the federal and state courts of Georgia, as well as administrative practice before state and federal agencies. I am very experienced in litigating disputes, including those about personal and disabling injuries, property and insurance, employment, and Wills and inheritances.

34 years | 1,000 cases

50%
Social Security & Disability 50%

34 years | 1,000 cases

50%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 250-250 per hour


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Georgia for 33 years

State: Georgia

Acquired: 1992

Active Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Rouse + Copeland LLC

602 Montgomery Street, Savannah, GA, 31401

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Christopher Lane Rouse's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.8 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Posted by Steve | November 27, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Trustworthy

I'm skeptical of lawyers in general. Some are OK. Some are good at what they do and trustworthy. Chris is such a person. He handled my disability claim well. He does other things also. Ask.

Posted by james | December 1, 2013

disability case

i hired him after i fired my out of town lawyer. he met with me whenever I called for an appointment. before the hearing we met and went over what to expect. I didnt understand everything he and the judge said, but he seemed knowledgable. the judge awarded my benefits and his decision seemed to say t...he same things my lawyer had already written to the judge

Posted by anonymous | November 20, 2013

Disability

WHen I called I usually only talked to his assistnt. Before we went in front of the judge, I went to his office and he pretended to be the judge and got me ready for how to talk. We won the case.

Posted by anonymous | October 25, 2013

Beware: Negligence and Unprofessionalism Severely Compromised My Case.

Even though he assured me, at the onset, that he was experienced with cases such as mine, he provided very little support during my Social Security Disability case. He did not engaged me in preparation before the ALJ hearing. He refused to return phone calls and messages afterwards and withdrew himse...lf from my case without a consultation/discussion promptly after the ALJ decision. His negligence severely compromised my case. His actions were not those of an experienced and competent Disability attorney. In hindsight, I should have asked to speak with some of his satisfied clients. I should also have spoken to many other people who had been in my situation to know what I should have expected. Best, to you on your journey.

Christopher Rouse

Replied last April 19, 2014

Sometimes in taking cases, I agree to take cases that appear marginal. Sometimes I just want to try to help someone who is sympathetic. Oftentimes, based on what the client has told me, I expect to find certain medical records when I send out requests or subpoenas. In some cases, the clients have correctly informed me what the medical records will say, and I am able to put together a convincing case in front of the Judge. Other times, the medical records do not support what the client has told me. When this happens, I am sometimes too reluctant to tell the client that he/she does not have a very good case. Since this client's case, I have changed my procedures to inform the client when I believe the medical records have not lived up to what I was told in my meetings with the client. If I am only able to get the records shortly before the hearing, I will still go to the hearing with the client and present the best case possible on the evidence available, but in those cases I will not appeal the denial past the hearing. In this particular case, I should have told the client this before we went to the hearing.

See All Client Reviews

Christopher Lane Rouse's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Christopher
Jeffrey Williams headshot
Jeffrey Williams

Litigation lawyer | Sep 14

Relationship: Other

"Mr. Rouse is a very thorough, competent lawyer, who will keep you well informed in your case. I recommend him highly."

Wallace James Williams headshot
Wallace Williams

Probate lawyer | May 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Chris is both knowledgeable and honorable. You can trust his advise and his word. If I am unable to take a case I refer the clients to Chris without reservation."

Joseph Michael Smith Caballe headshot
Joseph Caballe

Insurance lawyer | Sep 18

Relationship: Other

"Having read this attorneys posts, I can attest to his vast knowledge of this area of law. He knows what hes talking about when it comes to Disability issues and Insurance issues. I wholeheartedly endorse Mr. Rouse."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.6 (Good)

Work Experience

1992 - Present

Partner, Rouse + Copeland LLC

Education

N/A

Georgia State University

law

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution