Adam J. Conti

I had a consultation with Conti, during which he told me I had a strong case. After the first meeting, he was never available which struck me as odd. His office staff (assistants and paralegals) seemed to always have a reason why he wasn't available which conveniently made it possible for me to talk ...with an assistant. Conti never showed up at a hearing and his assistant and paralegal drafted letters and made appearances at hearings. The staff consistently provided an excuse why Conti couldn't make an appearance at hearings, and they told me as the case evolved he would be available. His staff would often tell me the assistant was in consult with Conti and not to worry. None of it made sense. There should be an ethical issue if I paid for Conti to represent me and he outsourced my case to his assistant. The assistant showed up at the hearing. I was told that the presiding Administrative Judge didn't like Conti, so the assistant represented me. Again, all of this behavior was bizarre but I remained optimistic. I paid handsomely for each consultation and provided supporting documentation for my case against my employer. During a hearing the assistant failed to question my employer about allegations made against me, and I raised the matter with the assistant, then the assistant attempted to address the matter and the AJ told the assistant that the proceedings in that setting was beyond objection and he should have acted sooner. Disappointed all the way around that there was a missed opportunity to counter allegations that were falsely made. At that point my instincts were Conti and staff didn't have my best interest nor were they representing me to WIN. Disappointed in the way my case was handled.