Karen Roberts Turner

Karen Roberts Turner

5.0
Rating: 8.3

Licensed for 33 years

Medical malpractice Lawyer at Bethesda, MD
Practice Areas: Medical Malpractice, Litigation, Mediation

4600 East-West Highway, Suite 201, Bethesda, MD

About Karen

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Litigation 5%

35 years

5%
Mediation 1%

Recently completed mediation training offered by Center for Dispute Settlements.

17 years

1%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 27 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1999

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 33 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1992

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Karen Roberts Turner

4600 East-West Highway, Suite 201, Bethesda, MD, 20814-3453

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Karen Roberts Turner's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 4
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Brenda | October 24, 2010 | Medical Malpractice

The Best and nothing but the Best!

Ms. Turner did an outstanding job with our case. She is always well prepared, knowledgeable and professional. She handles our complex corporate structure effortlessly providing all involved persons with case analysis relevant to their position or line of service. The defense was aggressive but ins...ightful to our overall corporate goals in the litigation. She and her support staff were accessible and communicated well at every step in the process. Having worked with a many attorneys I find Ms. Turner's legal analysis extremely comprehensive and reliable. Finally, Ms. Turner is absolutely impressive in the courtroom. I would recommend her very highly to anyone seeking expert medical malpractice defense!

Posted by S. | October 21, 2010 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Karen R. Turner

Ms. Turner exhibits all of the qualities an excellent attorney should have. She is capable, honest, intellegent, informed and professional. I would strongly recommend her services and would seek, and have sought in several instances, her legal expertise and representation. Ms. Turner excelled i...n my Civil case, researched the issue at hand throughly and thoughtfully and provided solid, clear, and sound legal advise which ended in my favor. Ms. Turner's breadth of the subject was obvious in my conversations with her which I found to be informative, clear and for me calming. I ask a lot of questions and she was always willing to take the time to answer them so that I understood the issue and possible end result. Ms. Turner is masterful at her craft, has honed her legal skill for many years and can, and will exceed your expectations.

See All Client Reviews

Karen Roberts Turner's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Karen

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.3 (Excellent)

Honors

2010

Listed, Maryland Super Lawyers

2010

Listed, District of Columbia Super Lawyers

2009

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

Listed, Maryland Super Lawyers

2009

Listed, District of Columbia Super Lawyers

2009

Listed, Best Lawyers in America

Work Experience

1992 - Present

Member, Hamilton Altman Canale & Dillon

1997 - 2000

Legal Methods Instructor, American University School of Law

1993 - 1997

Visiting Professorial Lecturer of Law, George Washington University National Law Center

1991 - 1992

Associate, Post & Schell

Associations

2008 - Present

African American Alumni of Vassar College

Co-chair

1997 - Present

National Bar Association

1992 - Present

District of Columbia Bar

1987 - Present

Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.

District of Columbia Bar, Litigation Section

Member

2008 - 2008

Litigation Counsel of America

Fellow

Sample of Legal Cases

M. B.

The Court of Special Appeals agreed with the defense and decided that the trial court properly transferred the case. The verdict in favor of the defendant doctor was upheld.

J.M.

The Court of Appeals rejected the plaintiff's arguments and affirmed the verdict for the defendant.

H.J.

The case was dismissed. The Court of Appeals later affirmed the dismissal.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1991

George Washington University National Law Center

JD - Juris Doctor

1988

Georgetown University

MA - Masters

1986

Vassar College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution