Richard Martin Reed

Richard Martin Reed

4.2
Rating: 7.4

Licensed for 22 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Manassas, VA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Personal Injury, Divorce & Separation ... +2 more

9214 Center Street, Third Floor, Manassas, VA

About Richard

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 35%

Including Serious Felonies, Misdemeanors, and Traffic Violations.

35%
Divorce and Separation 20%

Including Divorce, Separation, Spousal Support, Child Support, Child Custody, Visitation and Equitable Distribution.

20%
Personal Injury 20%

Including Automobile Accidents, Slip and Falls, Defective Products.

21 years

20%
Workers Compensation 15%

Representing Claimant's, Insurance Defense and Self-Insured Entitites.

21 years

15%
Defective and Dangerous Products 10%

Including Plaintiff and Defense

21 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 325-400 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in South Carolina for 3 years

State: South Carolina

Acquired: 2022

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 22 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 2003

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Richard Martin Reed

9214 Center Street, Third Floor, Manassas, VA, 20110

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Richard Martin Reed's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.2 /5.0

5 Client Reviews

5 star (4)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by Diana | February 26, 2015

Personal Injury- and previous experience

Both Mr. Reed and his wife have worked on my personal injury case. They have kept me informed and are very knowledgeable in the process. They are professional and always on point with responses to the insurance company's attorney. The insurance company of the individual who rear-ended me at a traff...ic stop has refused to pay my medical bills. The Reed Law Firm, has been firm and professional in their request that the case be settled. I am confident that we will end up with a favorable outcome. I was previously represented my Ms. Reed in my divorce; I was very please with the representation I received during the divorce. Ms. Reed worked relentlessly, I felt very well represented, Ms. Reed took over my divorce case after a unpleasant experience with another female attorney who lacked in professionalism, ethics and compassion. I can't say enough about both Mr. and Mrs. Reed in the manner in which they have represented me. I was new to this area and did not where to turn when by chance I ran into an individual who highly recommended Ms. Reed to me.

Posted by Victoria | January 30, 2015

Excellent advocate

I hired Mr. Reed to represent me in a contested divorce. He kept me constantly informed and up-to date throughout the entire case. He was knowledgeable and a great advocate for me. He was great in the courtroom, and we got a complete victory in my opinion. I highly recommend Mr. Reed.

Posted by Cole | January 30, 2015

Pre-nup agreement

I worked with Both Richard and his wife/partner, Vanessa on a complicated and important pre-nuptial agreement. I found the entire firm to be absolutely first class. I was originally thinking I would go it alone and write up my own pre-nup using online searches to gather information. THAT would have b...een a huge mistake, they pointed out many items I would have missed had I done that.

Posted by Melvin | January 9, 2014

Little Effort toward my Case (To Amend divorce decree/custody)

1st, when I contacted the Reed Law Firm, I specifically said I was looking for a female attorney (Vanessa Reed) to represent me and we had less than two months to prepare. I was told Mrs. Reed could work my case once she return from Maternity leave in 10 days, but for now Mr. Reed will work with us. ... 2nd...after consultation, we hired the Reed Law Firm (paid $2500 + $250 consult fee), later we were told Mr. Reed would work the case. . ...3rd.. one-day after initial consultation, I handed Mr. Reed my entire file from previous attorney firm I was working with (female attorney took a new job). That file had everything our new attorney would need and we provided specific details. 3 very important things we (my wife and I) wanted presented in court: A. My son's below-grade school results 3 years in a row from lack of help from his mom, B. it was very difficult to communicate with the mother (we had 2 years of documentation) and C. the inconsistency of the mother's employment and continual evictions. In a meeting and via email, I informed Mr. Reed to contact the witnesses to see if he could use them before subpoenaing all witnesses. Eventhough the witness list was in the file I provided, Mr. Reed ask for the witness lists again. I provided the witness lists the very next day. Two of the original 7 names just didn't have a mailing address. 2 weeks past and Mr. Reed still hadn't contacted a witness. I contacted Mr. Reed several times via email about the witness list and it took days for him to respond. In the end because time was running short, Mr. Reed ended up sending out 6 subpoenas (prior to speaking to witnesses) and called only 3 to court. But I had to pay for the services of 6 subpoenas from 1st witness list (there were two witness list). . . 4th: Mrs. Reed started assisting Mr. Reed, but it was as if they either wasn't communicating or I believe Mr. Reed wasn't working on my case. . .Mrs. Reed sent me an email asking for my son school records from previous school and the witness list and a few other things...But I had already provided these things to Mr. Reed secretary twice already. . .this would be the 3rd time I was providing the same stuff (that was all in my file in the beginning, if they just reviewed the file)... I would email my attorney (Mr. Reed) inquiring about certain things on the case and I wouldn't get a response until I sent out a 3rd email with the same question, finally Mrs. Reed would respond (she wasn't my attorney, I never met her)... I met with Mr. Reed 4 business days before trial date to see what he prepared and he hadn't prepared anything... during this meeting, Mr. Reed asked had I turned in the school records yet... I had turned that in a 3rd time, 2 weeks prior to this meeting... he wasn't working on my case. I emailed Mr. Reed again 2 and 1 business days before court date inquiring about what he had prepared for court and to make sure he would bring up everything we requested, I never got a response back from Mr. Reed. The next time I spoke with him was outside the courtroom on court date... Court day, it was evident Mr. Reed wasn't prepared. His questions were too the wrong witnesses; he messed up specific events and he didn't bring up all key points we wanted; we got full-custody mainly because the defendant had no attorney and we were in a better financial position. When I received my final invoice from Mrs. Reed (a combination of all 4 invoices seeing for the first time) there were 7 or more charges I shouldn't have been charged for (2 were duplicates and an additional subpoena charge). Mrs. Reed removed 3 of the smaller charges but they refused to meet with me or have a phone conference to discuss the other charges. They sent my account to collections 18 days after I received final invoices eventhough I paid $250 on acct within 15 days and agreed to make a monthly payment until March when I would pay account balance off.. I was still receiving bills of services used for trial

Richard Reed

Replied last March 11, 2015

This exceedingly long and malicious review fails to highlight the following: 1. We delivered a complete victory in court, during which time, I was complemented by the Judge for my presentation. 2. The client previously fired at least one other attorney due primarily to his assertion that the attorney was "not working on [his] case". 3. In excess of 20 hours of attorney time were expended in preparation for this matter after the client retained us just six (6) weeks prior to trial. Twelve (12) pages of type written notes were prepared for the trial and an exhibit binder was prepared for submission to the court. The client asked for a copy of these materials via e-mail at 11:20 p.m. the night prior to trial. Not surprisingly, I did not reply immediately. 4. Seven (7) witnesses were prepared for trial via telephone and in person interview. Three (3) of the witnesses had to be interviewed on the day of court, due the client's refusal to provide their contact information. The witnesses were identified by the client five (5) days prior to trial. All work of the firm was halted while we made sure these witnesses were subpoenaed. 5. When the client verbally and in writing asserted that he did not have to pay his bill, after we expended great effort on a truncated time table, we not surprisingly, referred the matter to our collection firm. In short, the client felt that his warrantless assertion that we were unprepared for trial alleviated the need to pay for services rendered. He then posted this review in furtherance of that goal.

Posted by Judy | July 2, 2011

The Reed Law Firm Review

I would highly recommend Rich for your legal needs. He recently represented me for a minor traffic ticket and my case was dismissed by the court. Rich explained in detail what to expect from the court and all documentation I would need in advance to prepare for the hearing. The Reed Law Firm fees ...were fair and affordable for the service that was provided.

See All Client Reviews

Richard Martin Reed's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Richard

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.4 (Very Good)

Honors

2019

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2001

Outstanding Academic Achievement, Federal Bar Association

2001

Excellence in the field of Civil Proceedure, Cali Award

Work Experience

2005 - 2011

Associate, Semmes Bowen & Semmes

2004 - 2005

Associate, Franklin & Prokopik

2004 - 2004

Associate, Brault Palmer Grove White & Steinhilber

2002 - 2002

Law Clerk, The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

2001 - 2003

Notes Editor, The Dickinson Law Review

2001 - 2001

Intern, United States Dept. of Justice

Associations

2011 - Present

Prince William County Bar Association

Member

Education

2003

Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1999

George Mason University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2013

Litigating the Uninsured & Underinsured Motorist Claim Key Elements of UM/UIM Coverage

2013

Advanced Workers' Compensation CLE Selected Issues in Workers' Compensation Law

2008

Virginia Workers' Compensation Seminar

Preparing for the Pre-Hearing Conference

2007

Advanced Workers' Compensation

Medical Issues and Their Role in the Complex Workers' Compensation Claim

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution