Rosemary Dettling

PRO

Rosemary Dettling

also known as Federal Employee Legal Services Center (FELSC)

5.0
46 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 34 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Sexual Harassment, Civil Rights, Discrimination

1629 K Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Rosemary

Biography

Top 50 Labor & Employment Verdicts in California in 2024

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 70%

35 years

70%
Civil Rights 10%

35 years

10%
Discrimination 10%

35 years

10%
Sexual Harassment 10%

35 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2016 2012 2010
Silver Client Champion

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 4 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2022

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 32 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1994

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 34 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1992

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Federal Employee Legal Services Center (FELSC)

1629 K Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20006

felsc.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find Rosemary online.

Rosemary Dettling's Reviews

Showing 11 - 15 of 16 reviews | General Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | May 20, 2012 | Discrimination

Attorney and Dettling Client

Ms. Dettling represented me in a discrimination matter against the U.S. Department of Justice. That's right, just imagine taking on that agency. Yet through use of technology, she was able to protect my interests, despite the fact that I was not stationed in D.C. I am a lawyer who worked with lawy...ers for many years before passing the Bar. As such, I can confidently attest that Ms. Dettling can skillfully assist a client in employment distress by immediately focusing on critical issues. She does so, to the exclusion of issues that are irrelevant or not yet ripe for resolution. Ms. Dettling will respond to client communications. She was not daunted by the prospect of taking on USDOJ or by voluminous discovery materials. Though my matter is still pending, Ms. Dettling has already assisted in achieving a significant improvement in my situation. When the agency took inappropriate actions that warranted her immediate intervention, Ms. Dettling had my back. It is arguable that attorneys make bad clients (on the logic that "no one can do it like I can"). But when an attorney realizes that he is out of his area of expertise or truly in over his head, he may realize that it is high time to bring on an advocate. I am very grateful that Ms. Dettling did not refuse to take my case just because I was a lawyer. I recall that during my initial contact with her, I was worn out from the fight and frightened of the likely consequences of having been a whistleblower and of filing suit against my agency. Even the agency's internal complaint procedure turned into a very lengthy process and was a nightmare to navigate. From our first conversation, Ms. Dettling listened compassionately and recommended action that I am convinced was my ultimate salvation. Finally, for employees who -- like me -- did not get in it "for the money," but instead want justice and the right to get back to work without discriminatory hazing, a consultation with Ms. Dettling to be as welcome as an oasis in the desert.

Posted by Ginny | April 04, 2012 | Employment & Labor

EEO Case

Finding a lawyer in a small town that is willing to work with you against a large government agency is very difficult. Finding one on-line thousands of miles away is very scary. You send them thousands of dollars and hope it is a legimate web site. For those of you government employees in this sit...uation, you need to know that this lawyer is one you can trust. In the beginning I was very worried that I had done the wrong thing in hiring an attorney on-line in another state. However, Ms. Dettling proved to be exactly what I needed and was very patient with me through my initial fears and lack of legal knowledge. Ms. Dettling took a lot of grief from the judge and the opposing attorney to the point where it bordered on verbal abuse. She stood her ground in my defense and knew the law and defended it against a bias judge. If you have an EEO case against the federal government, try her. You won't be disappointed.

Posted by John | March 28, 2012 | Employment & Labor

Best Lawyer in DC for protecting your rights as a government employee

³I have engaged Ms. Dettling on several job-related appeals to the MSPB and the EEOC. She is an outstanding lawyer and she will stick with you through "thick and thin" to win your case(s). I have never witnessed another lawyer with her inherent abilities to prepare credible, well-written, and log...ical briefs. She is easy to communicate with and she will take your calls. What distinguishes Ms. Dettling from other lawyers is that she combines compassion and intellect with excellent legal representation. You cannot do better than her if you are fighting unfair and unfounded actions initiated by the federal government. She truly takes your interests to heart. She is tenacious when it comes to fighting for your rights and your job. >

Posted by Renee | November 03, 2009 | Government

Professional and intelligent

Rosemary took my case in May of this year. When I thought about going up against a Federal Government agency, I was nervous, Rosemary was not! I was so impressed with her professional attitude, positive demeanor and strong knowledge of my rights. She worked had to force the defendants attorneys to... turn over necessary documentation. She fought hard to ensure all evidence and witnessed were admitted. She was always going the extra mile to get things done. She cared about my case and fought hard for me. My case was settled out of court with a positive outcome on my behalf. I could not have done it without Rosemary and I will be forever grateful.

Posted by anonymous | May 06, 2009 | Government

Great attorney!

I have worked for the federal government for 20 years. My case was a very complicated one that covered a period of four years. Rosemary was a Godsend to me. I was worried that someone who didn't live through it all would never understand it. Rosemary cut right through voluminous information to ge...t right to the heart of everything. She gives me hope that sometimes the little guys really win against the giants!

See All Client Reviews

Rosemary Dettling's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Rosemary
Joanne Dekker Donohue headshot
Joanne Donohue

Employment and labor lawyer | Dec 03

Relationship: Co-worker

"Rosemary is a highly professional and experienced attorney. She is committed to her clients and to resolving their issues expeditiously and efficiciently. It is a pleasure working with her."

View All Endorsements
Sara Lynne Bloom headshot
Sara Bloom

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Top Employment Lawyer, Washingtonian Magazine

2025

Client Champion Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2025

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2024

Top 50 Labor & Employment Verdicts in California in 2024, TopVerdict

2023

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2022

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2021

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2020

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2019

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2018

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2016

Client's Choice, Avvo

2012

Client's Choice, Avvo

2010

Client's Choice, Avvo

Work Experience

2007 - Present

Owner/Attorney, Federal Employee Legal Services Center (www.felsc.com)

2002 - 2006

Attorney, U.S. Department of Transportation

2000 - 2001

Attorney, U.S. Department of Commerce

1991 - 2000

Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division

Associations

2022 - Present

New York Bar

Member

2021 - Present

U.S. Court of Appeals - DC Circuit

Member

2007 - Present

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association (“MWELA”)

Member

2007 - Present

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Member

1994 - Present

District of Columbia Bar

Member

1994 - Present

Superior Court of the District of Columbia

Member

Pro Hac Vice Admission (Alaska, Maryland, and California)

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

DAMWYK v. KENDALL, III (AIR FORCE), Case No. 2:22-cv-04424-HDV-SK

Successful

GUESS v. EPA

Successful

BARTRON v. DOD

Successful

DAVIS v. FAA

Successful

FIVECOAT V. US AIR FORCE

Successful

JACKSON v. US AIR FORCE

Successful

CLIFFORD v. USPS

Successful

LAMPKINS V. USPS

Successful

AMES v. DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: VA failed to accommodate disabled employee.

Successful

JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Judge orders FBI to reverse termination and reinstate client.

Successful

Damwyk v. Kendall III

More case summaries:

Successful

Additional case summaries:

Successful

SIMON v. U.S. POSTAL: Postal Service found guilty of race discrimination.

Successful

KELLY v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: Postal Service discriminated against client based on perceived disability.

Successful

BATSON-RILEY v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS: VA culpable for retaliating against employee.

Successful

ARTHUR v. COMMERCE: Attorney fees awarded in the middle of the hearing, as a sanction against the Commerce.

BENSON V. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE: Granted request to void settlement agreement.

Successful

LANE-PORTER v. U.S. ARMY: Client awarded $80,000 plus four years backpay.

Successful

WELLARD v. DOJ: $70,000 awarded in compensatory damages; DOJ liable for disability discrimination and reprisal.

Successful

RODROCK v. U.S. ARMY: Awarded $110,000, reinstatement to her job, and years of backpay.

Successful

PIERRE v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: $35,000 awarded in compensatory damages; disability discrimination and retaliation.

Successful

CARR v. NASA: $100,000 awarded for disability discrimination.

Successful

RIOS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE: Dep’t. of Commerce guilty of whistleblower retaliation.

Successful

GROGANS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION: Client awarded $125,000.00 in compensatory damages and backpay.

Successful

FLORY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: VA found liable in a mixed-motive termination case.

Successful

WHITFILED v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: VA liable for same sex harassment.

Successful

GARRATY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Client awarded $35,000.00 in compensatory damages

Successful

CAROS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Judge ordered DHS to reverse termination; client wins three years backpay.

Successful

DOHERTY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Client awarded $110,000 in Compensatory Damages.

Successful

THORNSBERRY v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: Postal Service found guilty of sex discrimination.

Successful

SCOGGINS v. U.S. ARMY: Judge ordered Army to reverse termination; client wins three years backpay.

Successful

LEWIS v. U.S. ARMY: Army found guilty of retaliatory harassment.

Successful

COMPLAINANT v. U.S. ARMY: Army ordered to reverse termination; client wins $65,000 and five years backpay.

Successful

MOORE v. AIR FORCE: Air Force guilty of sexual harassment, retaliatory harassment, and constructive discharge.

Successful

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

American University

MA - Master of Arts in Literature

1991

Notre Dame Law School

JD -Juris Doctor

1987

University of San Diego

BA - Bachelor of Arts in International Relations

Publications

2026

Federal Employee Legal Services Center Case Results

2026

Federal Employee Legal Services Center Testimonials

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution