Rosemary Dettling

PRO

Rosemary Dettling

also known as Federal Employee Legal Services Center (FELSC)

5.0
46 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 34 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Sexual Harassment, Civil Rights, Discrimination

1629 K Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Rosemary

Biography

Top 50 Labor & Employment Verdicts in California in 2024

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 70%

35 years

70%
Civil Rights 10%

35 years

10%
Discrimination 10%

35 years

10%
Sexual Harassment 10%

35 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2016 2012 2010
Silver Client Champion

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 4 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2022

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 32 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1994

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 34 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1992

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Federal Employee Legal Services Center (FELSC)

1629 K Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20006

felsc.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find Rosemary online.

Rosemary Dettling's Reviews

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by anonymous | September 23, 2014 | Employment & Labor

Lifesaver!

I relied completely on Ms. Dettling's knowledge and expertise to help me through the most frightening and disturbing events of my professional career. Her calm guidance and experience were reassuring to me and her professional manner and communication projected serious intent to others. Her involveme...nt in and handling my case made a huge positive difference that I could not have brought about without her. For situations involving employment disputes with the Federal government, I highly recommend Ms. Dettling and her team!

Posted by Jim | November 19, 2009 | Employment & Labor

Great Attorney!

Within the first few minutes of our telephone conversation, I knew that Ms. Dettling understood what was happening to me. Ms. Dettling was able to weed out irrelevant issues and bring the focus of EEO misconduct forward, to the Administrative Judge. My case was complex at times, and I felt somewhat... overwhelmed by the system and its legal terms. Ms. Dettling reassured me about the developments of my case and was always straight-forward and patient when answering my questions. I am not assigned to the Washington DC area and I could only speak with Ms. Dettling via telephone. The distance was irrelevant to my case, as Ms. Dettling was able to complete all needed documents via email and fax, in a most timely fashion. After eighteen months of involvement with my case, Ms. Dettling’s additional strengths were shown when she arrived for the EEOC Hearing. The agency never took my complaint seriously, instead making up issues about me, where there were none. After Ms. Dettling’s cross-examination, it is to their regret, I’m most certain. I am very grateful to have met Ms. Dettling.

Posted by Jim | November 19, 2009 | Employment & Labor

Great Attorney

Within the first few minutes of our telephone conversation, I knew that Ms. Dettling understood what was happening to me. Ms. Dettling was able to weed out irrelevant issues and bring the focus of EEO misconduct forward, to the Administrative Judge. My case was complex at times, and I felt somewhat... overwhelmed by the system and its legal terms. Ms. Dettling reassured me about the developments of my case and was always straight-forward and patient when answering my questions. I am not assigned to the Washington DC area and I could only speak with Ms. Dettling via telephone. The distance was irrelevant to my case, as Ms. Dettling was able to complete all needed documents via email and fax, in a most timely fashion. After eighteen months of involvement with my case, Ms. Dettling’s additional strengths were shown when she arrived for the EEOC Hearing. The agency never took my complaint seriously, instead making up issues about me, where there were none. After Ms. Dettling’s cross-examination, it is to their regret, I’m most certain. I am very grateful to have met Ms. Dettling.

See All Client Reviews

Rosemary Dettling's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Rosemary
Joanne Dekker Donohue headshot
Joanne Donohue

Employment and labor lawyer | Dec 03

Relationship: Co-worker

"Rosemary is a highly professional and experienced attorney. She is committed to her clients and to resolving their issues expeditiously and efficiciently. It is a pleasure working with her."

View All Endorsements
Sara Lynne Bloom headshot
Sara Bloom

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Top Employment Lawyer, Washingtonian Magazine

2025

Client Champion Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2025

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2024

Top 50 Labor & Employment Verdicts in California in 2024, TopVerdict

2023

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2022

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2021

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2020

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2019

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2018

America's Most Honored Lawyer, American Registry

2016

Client's Choice, Avvo

2012

Client's Choice, Avvo

2010

Client's Choice, Avvo

Work Experience

2007 - Present

Owner/Attorney, Federal Employee Legal Services Center (www.felsc.com)

2002 - 2006

Attorney, U.S. Department of Transportation

2000 - 2001

Attorney, U.S. Department of Commerce

1991 - 2000

Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division

Associations

2022 - Present

New York Bar

Member

2021 - Present

U.S. Court of Appeals - DC Circuit

Member

2007 - Present

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association (“MWELA”)

Member

2007 - Present

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Member

1994 - Present

District of Columbia Bar

Member

1994 - Present

Superior Court of the District of Columbia

Member

Pro Hac Vice Admission (Alaska, Maryland, and California)

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

DAMWYK v. KENDALL, III (AIR FORCE), Case No. 2:22-cv-04424-HDV-SK

Successful

GUESS v. EPA

Successful

BARTRON v. DOD

Successful

DAVIS v. FAA

Successful

FIVECOAT V. US AIR FORCE

Successful

JACKSON v. US AIR FORCE

Successful

CLIFFORD v. USPS

Successful

LAMPKINS V. USPS

Successful

AMES v. DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: VA failed to accommodate disabled employee.

Successful

JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Judge orders FBI to reverse termination and reinstate client.

Successful

Damwyk v. Kendall III

More case summaries:

Successful

Additional case summaries:

Successful

SIMON v. U.S. POSTAL: Postal Service found guilty of race discrimination.

Successful

KELLY v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: Postal Service discriminated against client based on perceived disability.

Successful

BATSON-RILEY v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS: VA culpable for retaliating against employee.

Successful

ARTHUR v. COMMERCE: Attorney fees awarded in the middle of the hearing, as a sanction against the Commerce.

BENSON V. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE: Granted request to void settlement agreement.

Successful

LANE-PORTER v. U.S. ARMY: Client awarded $80,000 plus four years backpay.

Successful

WELLARD v. DOJ: $70,000 awarded in compensatory damages; DOJ liable for disability discrimination and reprisal.

Successful

RODROCK v. U.S. ARMY: Awarded $110,000, reinstatement to her job, and years of backpay.

Successful

PIERRE v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: $35,000 awarded in compensatory damages; disability discrimination and retaliation.

Successful

CARR v. NASA: $100,000 awarded for disability discrimination.

Successful

RIOS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE: Dep’t. of Commerce guilty of whistleblower retaliation.

Successful

GROGANS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION: Client awarded $125,000.00 in compensatory damages and backpay.

Successful

FLORY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: VA found liable in a mixed-motive termination case.

Successful

WHITFILED v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: VA liable for same sex harassment.

Successful

GARRATY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Client awarded $35,000.00 in compensatory damages

Successful

CAROS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Judge ordered DHS to reverse termination; client wins three years backpay.

Successful

DOHERTY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: Client awarded $110,000 in Compensatory Damages.

Successful

THORNSBERRY v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: Postal Service found guilty of sex discrimination.

Successful

SCOGGINS v. U.S. ARMY: Judge ordered Army to reverse termination; client wins three years backpay.

Successful

LEWIS v. U.S. ARMY: Army found guilty of retaliatory harassment.

Successful

COMPLAINANT v. U.S. ARMY: Army ordered to reverse termination; client wins $65,000 and five years backpay.

Successful

MOORE v. AIR FORCE: Air Force guilty of sexual harassment, retaliatory harassment, and constructive discharge.

Successful

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

American University

MA - Master of Arts in Literature

1991

Notre Dame Law School

JD -Juris Doctor

1987

University of San Diego

BA - Bachelor of Arts in International Relations

Publications

2026

Federal Employee Legal Services Center Case Results

2026

Federal Employee Legal Services Center Testimonials

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution