I help folks with criminal defense, juvenile law, landlord/tenant disputes, and a variety of other legal issues. Whatever the case may be, you can count on me to provide you with honest, straightforward advice.
When you meet with me, we’ll discuss the facts of your case, review the law, talk about your options, and we’ll come up with a plan. After we’ve met, you'll have a good understanding of your case, and your stomach should start feeling better.
Sometimes, folks call me with an issue that I'm not able to help them with, and that’s OK. If I can’t be of service, I’ll try to connect you with someone who can help.
If you’re in the York area, and you have a legal concern, don’t hesitate to reach out to us. We have a great team of lawyers, and you can visit our website at www.ghhrlaw.com.
|Attorney||Griest, Himes, Herrold, Reynosa LLP||2012 - Present|
|Attorney||Lineberry, Semke & McPate, LLC||2008 - 2012|
|Assistant Public Defender||York County Office of the Public Defender||2003 - 2008|
|Association name||Position name||Duration|
|York County Bar Association||Member||2007 - Present|
|Pennsylvania Bar Association||Member||2003 - Present|
|Pennsylvania Bar Association Administrative Law Journal||Hoenisch v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 567 Pa. 89, 785 A.2d 969 (2001)||2002|
|Widener University School of Law||J.D. - Juris Doctor||2003|
|Millersville University||B.S.Ed. - Bachelor of Science in Education||1994|
|In re I.U., No. 136 MDA 2018, 2018 WL 6060570 (Pa. Super. Nov. 20, 2018)||The Superior Court reversed the trial court's order, and remanded the case for reinstatement of reunification services for Father.|
|In re A.W., 162 A.3d 1117 (Pa. Super. 2017)||The Superior Court held that the trial court abused its discretion in changing the child's placement goal to adoption and remanded this matter to establish reunification with Father as child's placement goal.|
|Commonwealth v. Anderson (CP-67-CR-2115-2012)||Following a jury trial, Client was found not guilty on all charges, including attempted homicide.|
|In re M.J.H., 988 A.2d 694 (Pa. Super. 2010)||The Superior Court held that the evidence was insufficient to support the charges of Burglary and Theft.|
|In re K.J.V., 939 A.2d 426 (Pa. Super. 2007)||The Superior Court held that the evidence was insufficient to support the charges of Simple Assault and Criminal Mischief.|
Posted by anonymous
Wed Jun 20 2018
Posted by Heather
Wed Sep 02 2015
Posted by Bill H
Wed Aug 26 2015
Posted by FQ
Tue Aug 25 2015
Posted by anonymous
Tue Sep 01 2015