This lawyer cannot be reviewed
Deanna Lyn Istik

Deanna Lyn Istik

also known as Deanna Liptak

4.6
Rating: 7.0

Licensed for 15 years

Family Lawyer at Cranberry Township, PA
Practice Areas: Family, Child Custody, Divorce & Separation ... +4 more

8050 Rowan Road, Suite 403, Cranberry Township, PA

About Deanna

Practice Areas

7

Practice Areas

Family 20%

15 years

20%
Child Custody 15%

15 years

15%
Litigation 15%

15 years

15%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 300-350 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 15 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 2011

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Sinatra & Istik Law Office, PLLC

8050 Rowan Road, Suite 403, Cranberry Township, PA, 16066

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Deanna Lyn Istik's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.6 /5.0

22 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Domestic Violence

Posted by RACHEL | June 15, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Avoid at all costs if you're a survivor. She will dismiss your experience until you have no choice.

Attorney Istik failed to act as an effective advocate in a case where the client was a domestic violence survivor facing a documented pattern of coercive control. She pressured the client into a civil consent order that did not address ongoing financial abuse or secure the promised therapy for the ch...ild, despite an active CPS investigation against the opposing parent. Key Points of the Review: · Failed to Secure Therapy: Attorney Istik promised that the civil consent order would allow the child to receive critical therapy for trauma related to the stillbirth of a sibling and the father's physical abuse. The therapy never started, and there was no enforcement mechanism to hold the other parent accountable . · Ineffective Representation Against Coercive Control: She did not recognize or respond to the pattern of coercive control, including the threat of a 302 mental health commitment, which was used as a weapon in the divorce filing. · Ignored CPS Investigation: Despite the opposing party having an active CPS investigation for harming the child, she did not build a case around this critical evidence, leaving the child in an unsafe situation. · Pressure to Accept Unfair Agreement: She pressured the client to accept an order that required a psych evaluation for the client but not for the abusive father, ignoring the evidence provided by multiple psychiatrists. · Inadequate Financial Protection: The agreement did not prevent the opposing party from letting joint accounts go negative, refusing to pay for medical expenses, or attempting to refinance the family home multiple times. Final Verdict: Attorney Istik failed to protect her client's interests or the child's safety in a clear domestic violence case. Her approach left the client more vulnerable and forced her to seek new counsel. This experience reflects a failure to understand or properly handle a case involving coercive control and parental alienation. And the 7500 retainer that I paid was absolutely worthless. I had no protection, no options and no help. I was currently waiting to be filing with disability for PTSD. She allowed him to take advantage of my condition knowingly.

See All Client Reviews

Deanna Lyn Istik's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Deanna
Jill Dominique Sinatra headshot
Jill Sinatra

General practice lawyer | Jun 08

Relationship: Co-worker

"Deanna brings a wealth of experience and knowledge to the table. She works tirelessly on behalf of her clients and has an impressive track record of successful and vigorous advocacy. I'm proud to work with Deanna and pleased to endorse her as a very talented attorney."

Erin Kelly Rudert headshot
Erin Rudert

Personal injury lawyer | Mar 15

Relationship: Co-worker

"Deanna is a very caring attorney and an aggressive advocate for her clients. She is a fearless litigator, but can also relate well to people and provides excellent personal service to every individuals she represents."

Daniel Joseph Sammel headshot
Daniel Sammel

Personal injury lawyer | Mar 15

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. Deanna has taken her prior experience as a criminal defense attorney and has applied it to her burgeoning personal injury career. She simply will not be bullied by insurance companies. If you're looking for a competitive attorney to represent you, look no further."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.0 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2023 - Present

Partner, Sinatra & Istik Law Office, PLLC

2023 - 2023

Partner, Gilliland Vanasdale Sinatra Istik Law Office, LLC

2022 - 2023

Associate Attorney, Gilliland Vanasdale Law Office, LLC

2018 - 2022

Associate Attorney, SutterWilliams, LLC

2016 - 2017

Associate Attorney, Ainsman Levine, LLC

2011 - 2012

Public Defender, Fayette County Public Defender

2011 - 2016

Associate Attorney, Davis & Davis

Associations

2018 - Present

Pennsylvania Worker's Compensation Section

Member; Director

2016 - Present

Allegheny Bar Association

Member

2011 - Present

Fayette County Bar Association

Member

2011 - Present

Pennsylvania Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Robert Baker d/b/a Baker Construction v. Bernard Liptak and Pranay Amin

Superior Court Order in Favor of Mr. Liptak and Mr. Amin

See More Legal Cases

Education

2011

Western Michigan University

JD - Juris Doctor

2010

West Virginia University

MA - Masters

2006

University of Pittsburgh, Greensburg

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution