Walker Green Harman

Mr. Harman originally was hired because I trusted his representation and the things he said. I should have known better. Him and his entire legal team were incompetent. They sent all the right forms but once it came time to negotiate, follow up, and abide by court dates they completely dropped the ba...ll. Another lawyer had to be hired to represent me in a different state because walker was not prepared. Ultimately I found new representation and reached a favorable outcome. Walker and his legal team wasted my time, energy, and resources while being unprofessional. I believe when it comes to matters of importance DO NOT HIRE THEM!!! There are so many better lawyers in DFW, you should read this and do you research, consider yourself warned. DO NOT TRUST!!!!!

1. Walker Harman sent me letter quitting my case. He sent letter regular snail mail so that by time I received his 'Quit Letter' I had less than (10) days to find new legal counsel & for new legal counsel to prepare and file a reply to court on time, i.e., effectively forfeiting my. case. (photo and ...hard copies of Quit Letter, Initial Contract, both signed by Walker Harman are available, as is the envelope post marked, i.e., showing how few days his Quitting My Case left me, thus forcing me to forfeit) 2. A few weeks after receiving Quit Letter from Walker Harman himself, I was informed that Harman's most senior legal assistant assigned to my case and who I most interacted with, Lucas, was given mid year admittance to the academic institution/opposing party Harman was representing me against. 3. When I told Harman that a 60 Centre Street judge might be sitting on case and have an undisclosed relationship with the academic institute/opposing party in the complaint, Harman berated me saying I was "paranoid" "stupid"; A few months later the 60 Centre Street Judge himself then disclosed in a letter to court and that's available in NY Court Database (free of charge and accessible to anyone with wifi and email) that he - after, at that point 8 years - ought to disclose that he maybe ought to recuse himself because of his relationship to the academic institution that Walker Harman was representing me against, the conflict of interest relationship beginning same month and year he/the judge was 1st assigned my case, i.e., the judge's wife took a job paying a spot over $100k + benefits beginning same year and month he was 1st assigned my case in the same dept of large academic institution Harman was representing me against. 4. Harman now disputes I was a client of his firm when I have paperwork with his signature on it AND that he himself filed with courts, AND when it was he himself that I initially met with to discuss terms of his service who I signed client contract with.