It was an absolute pleasure to talk with Mr Bluestone. He has been patient and very knowledgeable helping me with a very complex case. He has explained answers to my questions and has given me excellent advice on how to move forward. Mr Bluestone gave me advice that many other lawyers did not. I am impressed and honored to have spoken to him. I will recommend everyone contact Mr Bluestone first for any matter they have . Very glad I called Mr Bluestone
I consulted with Mr. Bluestone and found him to be quite knowledgeable and informative. He provided a solid pathway to resolution of a vexing legal matter. I recommend him highly.
Andrew Lavoott Bluestone is Board Certified in Legal Malpractice has been awarded diplomate status by the American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys. This Board is organized and recognized by the American Bar Association and has met the rigid tests imposed by them.
Andrew Lavoott Bluestone is an Adjunct Professor of Law at St. John's University College of Law.
According to the American Bar Association, "a lawyer who is a certified specialist has been recognized by an independent profefessional certifiying organization as having an enhanced level of skill and expertise, as well as a substantial involvement in an established legal sepciaity. These organizations require a lawyer to demonstrate special training, experience and knowledge to insure that the lawyer's recognition as a certified specialist is meaningful and reliable."
According to DR 2-105, and now the revised Rules of Professional Conduct , Rule 7.4 "certification is not a requirement for the practice of law in the State of New York and does not necessarily indicate greater competence than other attorneys experienced in this field of law. The American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys is a private organization and not affiliated with any governmental authority."
If your attorney has made a mistake with your case, we can help you. We have represented clients in legal malpractice litigation in New York since 1978. I am the author of the New York Attorney Malpractice Blog [], an Outside Counsel Columnist for the New York Law Journal, and lecture to attorneys on legal malpractice issues. If you have a question about how an attorney handled your case, please call my office for a free consultation.
This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.
| Consulted Attorney
Mr V
It was an absolute pleasure to talk with Mr Bluestone. He has been patient and very knowledgeable helping me with a very complex case. He has explained answers to my questions and has given me excellent advice on how to move forward. Mr Bluestone gave me advice that many other lawyers did not. I am impressed and honored to have spoken to him. I will recommend everyone contact Mr Bluestone first for any matter they have . Very glad I called Mr Bluestone
Read less
Posted by sean | October 2, 2019
This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.
| Consulted Attorney
sr smith
I consulted with Mr. Bluestone and found him to be quite knowledgeable and informative. He provided a solid pathway to resolution of a vexing legal matter. I recommend him highly.
Posted by anonymous | September 8, 2015
This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.
| Consulted Attorney
Andrew Bluestone : Intelligent and ethical
Since 2002, I have had the privilege to consult Andrew Bluestone on various New York legal matters for Florida resident clients seeking representation. In addition to his specialty of legal malpractice, these cases have included personal injury and insurance litigation, trust and estate litigation, real property issues and contract disputes. Without exception, clients have expressed their unqualified gratitude.
Throughout my personal contact with Andrew, I have found his grasp of complex case facts to be stunning. His incisive analysis of the facts applied to prevailing law is nothing short of surgical. He has both a sharp mind and a razor-tipped pen.
His notable expertise in legal malpractice litigation, which relies on a full understanding of the underlying case, accounts, in part, for the breadth of his legal knowledge. Andrew stays on top of his field. He is well-versed in new case law which is reflected in his carefully-crafted articles on a wide range of legal topics.
Lastly, I feel compelled to add: Andrew Bluestone is an honorable gentleman. He is not a lawyer whose mind-set is driven by the “billable hour.” He is refreshingly candid and will not hesitate to caution a prospective client that their proposed legal action has little chance of success. Andrew Bluestone’s professional pathway never strays from working in the best interests of his client. This is a lawyer with both intelligence and integrity. . . a rare species in today’s litigious environment.
Read less
Posted by Christopher | September 1, 2015
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
| Hired Attorney
Most professinal lawyer
I am happy to say upon meeting and working with Mr Bluestone on 3 very complicated cases over 18 months I could not be happier he has given me a totally different perspective of what a professional attorney is .His calming demeanor and total knowledge of the law is overwhelming and contagious .His approach to getting things done a managing time and cost is remarkable .This man is a true professional and I highly recommend him .
Read less
Posted by Art | June 24, 2015
A Most Favorable Rating for Andrew Bluestone
I am pleased to submit this characterization of the work done for me by New York attorney Andrew Bluestone. Mr. Bluestone was fastidious, aggressive, knowledgeable, well versed in the law and committed. My case took a number of years but he was on top of it every step of the way and the outcome was most positive. I recommend him highly.
Read less
Posted by anonymous | December 16, 2014
Outstanding Job!
Mr Bluestone represented me in a malpractice action. I was confident I was in good hands. It was a complicated matter. He had such an understanding of the situation and took command. He delivered the exact result he predicted he would at our first consultation. I would highly recommend him.
Posted by anonymous | April 30, 2013
Represented my interests as a strong and highly capable advocate.
I retained Mr. Bluestone to settle a complex dispute I had with another law firm. He was responsive, knowledgeable, balanced in his analysis and communicative. He achieved a favorable result as efficiently as could have been possible.
Posted by anonymous | March 10, 2023
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
| Hired Attorney
Motion for Summary Judgment
I am surprised to learn that 50% of his skill set is in litigation. He should therefore have been prepared with a knowledge of specific points to prevail at this Motion in his papers. His generalizations were inadequate and his Oral argument was not persuasive. Even though he was engaged for a year on this matter. The abundance of exhibits he never mentioned either in his papers or when he stood at the lectern. I believe he never made a serious effort given the effort made over the years to bring this case forward. During the Oral argument the 2 Justices were not impressed. This claim has been in the courts for 19 years. There was an abundance of evidence to draw on but any preparation appeared to be lacking. He showed little enthusiasm to use this opportunity for me the client. I am left with the impression that Bluestone is a predator. One attorney said, I know him and I won't sue him but your inquiry will remain confidential.
Read less
Response from Andrew BluestoneMarch 11, 2023
This was an appeal to the 3d Department from the grant of summary judgment against my client. I was hired only to do the appeal. The client was pro-se in Supreme Court. I filed the appeal, got the Record and Briefs accepted and filed, then filed the Reply Brief and argued the appeal in person to the 3d Department. Sadly I was unable to get them to reverse the grant of summary judgment to the attorneys.
She had sued her trial lawyers for not getting a high enough verdict in a land-use flooding case. They got her $ 100,000 but she felt it was not enough. So, she sued the attorneys, pro-se.
The attorneys successfully moved for summary judgment. The reason that summary judgment was granted to the attorneys is because the client defended it pro-se. She did not use an expert on the motion, she did not put in a statement of material facts and she did not put in a counter-statement of material facts even though they were required. Her opposition was ineffective, and because of those shortcomings, summary judgment was granted. The only avenue for appeal was to argue that the attorneys lacked prima facie entitlement to summary judgment and that it should have been denied even though the pro-se client did not offer an expert nor follow the rules of summary judgment motions.
The client mixes up the mistakes made by her in the Summary Judgment motion with what happens on appeal. Of course, all of the motion papers were reproduced and discussed. All of the exhibits were discussed in the 33 page Brief and in the Reply Brief. Client is really unhappy that the judges had many questions and were very suspicious of her failure to use an expert or to follow the rules.
I regret that I was unable to convince the 5 Judges that even though the attorneys made a proper summary judgment motion and my client (pro-se) did not put in proper opposition, that summary judgment should nevertheless have been denied. I understand her disappointment. The "abundance of evidence" she talks about was what won her $ 100,000. She wanted more, and I was unable to get the Judges to agree that the attorneys did not deserve summary judgment in their favor.
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.
What determines Avvo Rating?
Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, education
Legal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Legal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagements
Discipline
Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Judgment for Plaintiff after trial in the Southern District of New York, appeal to the Second Circuit, Certified Question to the New York Court of Appeals and second appeal to the Second Circuit
Litigation Attorney | Sep 17
Relationship: Worked together on matter
"I endorse this lawyer's work. I have been involved in a few matters with Andrew Bluestone and have found him to be a savvy, well-prepared litigator who is comfortable in both Federal and State court."
Ethics and professional responsibility Attorney | Jun 06
Relationship: Worked together on matter
"I endorse this lawyer's work. Andrew Bluestone is an exceptionally dedicated and hard-working attorney. He has demonstrated the highest ethical standards and I endorse him without hesitation."