Ralph D. Sherman

PRO

Ralph D. Sherman

also known as Ralph Doane Sherman

4.7
Rating: 6.8

Licensed for 34 years

Gun Law Lawyer at New Britain, CT
Practice Areas: Gun Law, Expungement, Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI

130 West Main Street, New Britain, CT

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Ralph

Biography

Firearms Law - I help more people with pistol-permit problems than any other attorney in this state.

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Gun Law 50%

Pistol permits (concealed-carry permits). Appeals from denial or revocation of permit.

34 years | 2,600 cases

50%
Expungement 35%

Pardons.

34 years | 700 cases

35%
Criminal Defense 10%

Especially firearms-related charges.

34 years | 1,000 cases

10%
DUI and DWI 5%

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 15 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Licenses

Licensed in Connecticut for 34 years

State: Connecticut

Acquired: 1991

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Atty. Ralph D. Sherman

130 West Main Street, New Britain, CT, 06052-1315

ralphdsherman.com/

Atty. Ralph D. Sherman

130 W Main St, New Britain, CT, 06052-1315

ralphdsherman.com/

Ralph D. Sherman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

105 Client Reviews

Showing 26 - 28 of 28 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Patricia | December 01, 2023 | Hired Attorney

Terrible Experience with Attorney Ralph Sherman

I had an incredibly disappointing experience with Attorney Ralph Sherman. Despite paying him 50% upfront, he refused to continue representing me and failed to refund my money. His lack of people skills was evident from the start – he was rude and impossible to communicate with. When I asked him a que...stion, he responded defensively, stating that I seemed to know more than he did, leading to him abruptly ending our professional relationship. I strongly advise against hiring him, as his behavior and unprofessionalism left me without the legal representation I paid for.

Ralph Sherman

Replied last December 04, 2023

Here’s the rest of the story: This review was written by the client’s mother. The client originally contacted me one day after his 21st birthday. He wanted to obtain a pistol permit. He had a problematic past because of an incident several years earlier that involved him, his mother, and her firearms. (She stored her firearms improperly, allowing him to do something improper with them.) This past incident would present a challenge for his permit application, but I believed the challenge would not be insurmountable. The client’s mother agreed to pay for legal representation and signed a fee agreement that stated that if the son got into any new trouble (e.g., an arrest), then that would terminate the permit case without a refund. Exactly nine days later, after I began work on the permit case, the son (client) engaged in conduct that resulted in his arrest in Connecticut on several charges. A few weeks later his mother disclosed that he also had pending charges in New York State. At that point the mother had made two payments on a payment plan. Under the fee agreement, I could have dropped the permit case because of the arrests. But instead of dropping the permit case, I agreed to delay it in the hope that the Connecticut and New York cases could be resolved without the client being convicted. We agreed that no further payments would be made until the Connecticut and New York cases were resolved. About one year later the mother contacted me to say that all the cases had been dropped and erased from the son’s record, so we could move forward on the permit. I advised that I must do a record check to make sure the cases were actually erased; this would take a few weeks. Mother said that the record check was unnecessary and insisted on moving forward with the permit immediately, without the record check. I told her that to skip the record check would be irresponsible and that I could not represent her son if they insisted that I handle the case improperly. I provided a full refund. This one-star review is proof that the reviews on this website are real.

Posted by anonymous | February 12, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

trust me, do not hire this guy!

do NOT hire this guy! I paid him $1,000 hard earned American dollars to sit next to me during a hearing to defend me, and guess what? he said not 1 word the whole time to defend me, literally sat there and twirled him thumbs. he obviously does not take his career path seriously and only wants to take... your money. complete and total waste of money and time. this guy should be ashamed of himself just taking money like that.

Posted by Brian | December 30, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Gun Law

He said "Good luck!"

At first he initially showed a willingness to support my pistol permit appeal hearing. I had e-mail communication with him detailing the circumstances that led to the denial. Then I get a request to see him for an appointment in his office, which I did. He handed me back my documentation supporting m...y case, and wrote a 50% refund check. He stated, without going into too many specifics, that (paraphrased) our personalities "would not work well" and that I have specific ideas about this "case that wouldn't work". His tone suggested that he really wanted to get rid of me, so I did not press any additional questions. Did I e-mail him too much? Did I say something that pissed him off? Was there some particular aspect about my case that he felt he couldn't get involved with? He never directly communicated with me any of these possible problems/issues BEFORE the last appointment, and at the last appointment he never really went into any details. He just seemed keen on parting ways. No use trying to keep a lawyer who has made up their mind to part ways. Did not even recommend possible other lawyers who specialized in pistol permit denial cases as alternatives, just said "you can go find another lawyer". He did at least give advice to alert the Board of Firearm Examiners if you plan to drop your case; the worst thing you can do is just not show up.

See All Client Reviews

Ralph D. Sherman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Ralph
Jerald M Lentini headshot
Jerald Lentini

Unknown lawyer | Nov 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Whenever a client has a firearms-related issue in their case, the first thing I ask myself is "What would Ralph think?" There is simply no attorney in the state whom I would trust more to advise me on issues involving the details of Connecticut's gun laws. His experience in court and before administrative boards, his in-depth knowledge of firearms law, and his openness to help his fellow attorneys navigate these constantly shifting waters are all reasons why I keep Ralph at the top of my referrals list."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.8 (Good)

Work Experience

1991 - 2022

Owner, Attorney Ralph D. Sherman

Associations

1999 - Present

Connecticut Bar, Firearms Law Committee

Chairman

1995 - Present

National Rifle Association of America

Lifetime Member

2000 - 2004

Connecticut State Police Firearms Advisory Council

Member

1995 - 1999

Connecticut Bar Association, Firearms Law Committee

Chairman

1995 - 1999

Connecticut Bar Association, Firearms Law Committee

Founding Member

Education

1991

University of Connecticut School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1983

Western Connecticut State University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution