901-527-0511
Avvo Rating |
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Areas |
|
||||||
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Contingent (20%-33%)
|
||||||
Contact Information |
|
||||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||||
About MePhotos (0)Videos (0) |
Chris is a member of Gilreath Associates, one of the leading plaintiff-exclusive firms in Tennessee. Chris handles serious personal injury cases in the Mid-... more |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingFormer client? Write a review
“OUTSTANDING ATTORNEY”Posted by: Art, 8 months ago.
Client Review:
Outstanding Lawyer! I have non Mr. Gilreath for 3 years and always offers outstanding advice. I have not had the opportunity to use him personally...
more
Flag
“One GREAT Lawyer!!”Posted by: Wendi, 9 months ago.
Client Review:
I had a case that took some time. We had to deal with many road blocks from the work comp insurance company and Chris and his staff were wonderful....
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
I endorse this lawyer. I have known Chris for several years through his work in ATLA and AAJ. He is a committed and throrough advocate. Endorsement from lawyer: John Wiley , St. Louis (MO), 24 days agoChris has been fighting for the civil justice since the day he was born. We are lucky to have trial lawyers like Chris out their supporting our... more Endorsement from lawyer: Sach Oliver , Bentonville (AR), About 1 month ago |
License |
15 years since Christopher Gilreath was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 11
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Twitter feed |
|||||||||||||||||||
Recently Posted |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cases |
Outcome: Jury Verdict for $5,000,000
Outcome: State maximum verdict of $300,000 per person upheld
|