Christopher Hans Knauf

Christopher Hans Knauf

3.0
Rating: 9.7

Licensed for 29 years

Litigation Lawyer Practice Areas: Litigation, Civil Rights, Consumer Protection ... +2 more

About Christopher

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Civil Rights 20%

Disability, gender, race, sexual orientation, and others.

29 years | 250 cases

20%
Consumer Protection 20%

Our cases focus on trade school or educational fraud, as well as mental health parity in health care.

29 years | 50 cases

20%
Discrimination 20%

Disability rights is our focus, but we are interested in any and all civil rights matters, including Title IX, gender, race, sexual orientation, and others.

29 years | 250 cases

20%
Education 20%

We focus on special education (K-12), as well as discrimination and failure to accommodate disabilities in postsecondary and professional/trade schools.

29 years | 200 cases

20%
Litigation 20%

Civil litigation in disability rights, special education, employment, fair housing, and consumer rights.

29 years | 500 cases

20%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 200-700 per hour

Contingency

30%-50%

Pro bono

10 %

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 29 years

State: California

Acquired: 1996

Active

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Christopher Hans Knauf's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.0 /5.0

6 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (6) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 6 reviews

Posted by anonymous | July 20, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Civil Rights

ADA Claim Defense

Mr. Knauf represented us in an ADA claim related to our website. We are a small legacy business and our website wasn't readable using specific software for potential vision-impaired website visitors. It was a plaintiff's attorney known for scouring small business websites with legacy software. He hel...ped us navigate the process of updating the website to become ADA compliant and handled the case smoothly and professionally. Would highly recommend!

Posted by Cristina | July 17, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Civil Rights

A lawyer the truly made me feel equal.

Hello Everyone, I really don't write reviews. But This lawyer deserves it. I am handicap and in a wheelchair. And I found out the hard way that not every where you go is going to be equal opportunity. To sum it up, there was issues I had with a school that was denying me the same opportunity beca...use of my disability. So, he took my case. I wasn't seeking compensation, I was seeking rights for others. I just didn't want what happened to me happen to someone else with disabilities. I realize not everyone is going to have the same experience. But, my expectations were met. It's a very busy firm but he took the time to fight for me. That is something that I will never forget. So, in closing, we all may not have the same experience. But I can honestly say, my experience was truly great. I would recommend 100%

Posted by Parvin | April 15, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Education

Disappointing Experience with Attorney Christopher Due to Poor Communication and Delays

I sought legal assistance from Attorney Christopher following an unexpected dismissal from my university. Initially, his prompt and engaging responses encouraged me to engage in his services. However, the quality of our interactions did not align with my initial expectations after securing his servic...es. Following my initial payment, I experienced a significant decline in communication. Responses to my emails became infrequent, and mostly, I received no replies at all. Despite repeated attempts to initiate contact, our first official consultation—typically complimentary with most attorneys—was delayed repeatedly for over three months, even though I had already made a payment. This lack of responsiveness was particularly challenging during a vulnerable period in my life, exacerbating my distress and ultimately necessitating medical treatment for depression. While experiences can vary between clients, it is crucial to share that the support and guidance I was promised were not delivered in my case. For those in search of legal representation, considering an attorney's reliability and consistency in communication may be crucial.

Posted by anonymous | November 02, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Discrimination

Regret going with this lawyer

I sought help from Chris Knauf after he being the only name recommended by an outside agency. (It turns out the lead attorney at the agency and Knauf knew each other and previously trialed cases together, which was fine.) I sent documents to Knauf for review, but he did not touch it at all. It was on...ly until I visited his office and put down the retainer fee, that Knauf started delegating the tasks to others, especially his one associate and paralegal. Prior the incident, I somewhat believed that Knauf would care about my case, he has many cases that have gone on to trials related to disability discrimination. However, I feel that he was not honest with me. He could have told me during the consultation that my issue was not something he would be handling. He never dealt with any, but I did not know. Most Americans outside the law field wouldn’t know the difference between someone who would litigate a big case vs. someone who would simply mediate or file tort claims on your behalf. Knauf only does litigation, and that is where his reputation is. After I had some phone calls with Knauf’s associate, discussing matters that, now I believe, he was simply trained to spot does facts probably because he was still a young associate fresh out of law school. Nevertheless, it consumed both of our times, my retainer, and was not legally significant. Eventually, Knauf became very unresponsive with emails. He often told me he was handling some very big cases at the moment, implying that he was busy and just was not the right time for me. After many requests for updates, he finally told me that he did not think he can do anything with my case. And suggested that I moved on with my life. He never wrote me the summary of his views, which he told me he would. He even said he used up all of my retainers before finally realizing that there was nothing he could do. Go with Knauf if you’re discriminated against based on a physical disability and would involve a somewhat high impact in the county or local district of some sort. It has to be somewhat big, such as the defendant would be willing to settle in the million dollars range. This way, Knauf would be a good person for you. If not, and he’s depending on your $5000 retainer fee, I suggest you be very cautious. He would use it all, and then tell you don’t have any claims. I was deceived likely because of Knauf being too busy with other case and perhaps knew that I could not fund him anymore. Other experts agree that he could have told me all this from the beginning, but likely did not because he wanted to keep the retainer. Also, I fortunately did not listen to Knauf (I proceeded with a federal agency, which Knauf persuaded me not to do so), and the case has been determined in my favor. Besides losing money to Knauf, I also almost dropped what I had a claim for, if I had followed his advice, which he was actually supposed to act in good faith. Please do more research before going to Knauf. Be cautious of the free consultation, which would be hard to turn back.

Christopher Knauf

Replied last October 07, 2015

I appreciate the criticisms in this review, and I only wish this client had communicated to me their frustration early on so we could have made things right. When we take a case, and the vast majority of cases are on contingency, we do our best to be up front with expectations, updated on progress, and perform excellent work. In the rare case when a client pays a retainer for a case analysis, it is made very clear that we cannot guarantee a favorable outcome. While we can always do better, I believe this client was unhappy with the result, which was an honest result after a thorough review of the facts and law.

Posted by anonymous | October 28, 2015 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Retainer fees are his source of income

I found Christopher Knauf to be more a salesman than an attorney. He will send you to his paralegals until he thinks you would likely become one of his targets. Once you meet up in person for the "free consultation," you would only find out that your case would actually take more time to go into, and... the retainer of $5,000 would be for that purpose. After an extremely long period of time, he will tell you he's too busy working on other matters, while delegating the work to one of his associates. Finally, he would come back to you saying there is nothing much he would do. Thus, your time is wasted and your retainer fee is gone. The message he will tell you at the end is nothing more than what he could have told you from the start. He just wants your retainer fees, and I wouldn't be surprised if this is his primary source of income. If you think that sounds awful, keep in mind, it's even worse to get his final message and you end up not pursuing what you thought had a strong case. It isn't about your case, it's about what is most beneficial to him given the time he wants to put in for you and the retainer fees he would get from you.

Christopher Knauf

Replied last October 07, 2015

While work for clients does sometimes take a long time, and we could improve our promptness, the remainder of this review is entirely untrue and mean-spirited. In the rare case when a client pays a retainer for a case analysis, it is made very clear that we cannot guarantee a favorable outcome. It is unfortunate that a client chooses to take out their frustration in an anonymous online review.

See All Client Reviews

Christopher Hans Knauf's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Christopher
David Ward German headshot
David German

Civil rights lawyer | Sep 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mr. Knauf is an excellent attorney who gets great results for his clients. I strongly endorse him."

Samuel A. Luton II headshot
Samuel Luton

Discrimination lawyer | Jul 28

Relationship: Friend

"Chris is a fantastic lawyer and a fantastic person. There is no one I know that gives more attention to details than Chris. I heartily endorse him."

Michael Evan Waterstone headshot
Michael Waterstone

Civil rights lawyer | Oct 08

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Chris is a top-notch lawyer - I endorse him without reservation!"

View All Endorsements
Samuel A. Luton II headshot
Samuel Luton

Criminal defense lawyer

Surisa Evelyn Rivers headshot
Surisa Rivers

Education lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.7 (Superb)

Honors

2026

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Rising Star Award, Super Lawyers Magazine

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2006

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2005

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2004

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

1996

Shattuck Award, USC Law School

Work Experience

2006 - Present

Attorney/Owner, Knauf Associates

2003 - 2006

Associate, Lozano Smith

1998 - 2003

Civil Rights Attorney, Disability Rights Legal Center

1996 - 1998

Law Fellow, Bet Tzedek Legal Services

Associations

2015 - Present

California Association of Parent and Children's Advocates

Member

2012 - Present

Westside Center for Independent Living

Board Vice President

2010 - Present

Disability Rights Bar Association

Member

2008 - Present

Santa Monica Bar Association

Member

2000 - 2015

Santa Monica Disabilities Commission

Co-Founder, Commissioner, Former Chair

Sample of Legal Cases

Cox v. Patel

Jury verdict for Plaintiff

Barrios v. CIF

Successful appeal; settled thereafter

See More Legal Cases

Education

1996

USC Law School

Juris Doctor

1991

Univ of California at Los Angeles

B.A.

Speaking Engagements

2014

So Cal Fair Housing Conference

Service Animals and the Fair Housing Act

Languages

Spanish

English

Farsi

American Sign Language

Korean

Tagalog

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution