Matthew A. Mensik

Matthew A. Mensik

also known as Matt Mensik

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 14 years

Class action Lawyer at Spokane, WA
Practice Areas: Class Action, Litigation, Employment & Labor

422 W. Riverside Ave, Suite 1100, Spokane, WA

About Matthew

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Class Action 40%

Class Action Defense

40%
Litigation 35%

Commercial Litigation

35%
Employment and Labor 25%

Employment Defense

25%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 14 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2011

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Witherspoon Kelley

422 W. Riverside Ave, Suite 1100, Spokane, WA, 99201

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Matthew A. Mensik's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (1)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Matt Crotty | November 26, 2019 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Non-Matter Lawyer

Matt Mensik is an attorney with whom I have co-counseled and consulted with for the past eight years. His advice and attention to detail has proved invaluable in preparing me and my clients for success in at least two federal jury trials. If me or my family was in need of legal representation I would..., without a doubt, hire him.

See All Client Reviews

Matthew A. Mensik's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Matthew
Sawyer Robert Margett headshot
Sawyer Margett

Litigation lawyer | Feb 21

Relationship: Co-worker

"I’ve worked with Matt Mensik on several cases, both at the trial and appellate level. Matt is a hard-working detail oriented attorney whose enthusiasm for his practice is matched only by his willingness to put in as much work as it takes to achieve a good result."

Matthew Zachary Crotty headshot
Matthew Crotty

Litigation lawyer | Nov 27

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Matt is an excellent attorney. He has provided me invaluable help in preparing multiple complex cases for trial. More importantly, he's a very detailed and long term planner which, in turn, greatly assists in not only preparing matters for trial but successfully litigating those cases in court. I routinely refer business organizations to Matt for legal representation and if me, my business, or my family were in need of legal help I would, without a doubt, ask Matt for assistance."

Casey Morgan Bruner headshot
Casey Bruner

Litigation lawyer | Nov 26

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse Matthew Mensik. He is a smart, strategic attorney who works tirelessly to further his clients' interests."

Thomas G Jarrard headshot
Thomas Jarrard

Employment and labor lawyer | Nov 01

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Mathew Mensik is adept at any task. This arises from the fact that he is a Marine (a grunt) a combat veteran, and it shows in his stellar legal work--- focused, detailed and high caliber. In other words, he will get the job done, done well and with little, if any direction."

View All Endorsements
Michael Bradley Love headshot
Michael Love

Litigation lawyer

Sawyer Robert Margett headshot
Sawyer Margett

Litigation lawyer

Casey Morgan Bruner headshot
Casey Bruner

Litigation lawyer

Matthew Zachary Crotty headshot
Matthew Crotty

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2020

Rising Star, Thomas Reuters

2019

Rising Star, Thomas Reuters

2018

Rising Star, Thomas Reuters

2017

Rising Star, Thomas Reuters

2011

Member of the Order of the Barristers, Order of the Barristers

2011

Outstanding Advocate, TYLA Regional Competition 2011, Texas Young Lawyers Association

2010

Best Speaker, 3rd Place Overall, UW Mock Trial Competition, University of Washington School of Law, Moot Court Honor Board

2009

Best Speaker, 2nd Place Overall, UW Mock Trial Competition, University of Washington School of Law, Moot Court Honor Board

2008

Best Speaker, 2nd Place Overall, UW Mock Trial Competition, University of Washington School of Law, Moot Court Honor Board

2005

Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal, Navy and Marine Corps

Work Experience

2012 - Present

Principal, Witherspoon Kelley

2010 - 2010

Summer Associate, Witherspoon Kelly

2009 - 2009

Judicial Extern to Magistrate Judge James P. Hutton, United States Federal Court, Eastern District of Washington

2001 - 2005

Non-Commissioned Officer, United States Marine Corps

Associations

2012 - Present

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington

Member

2012 - Present

Spokane County Bar Association

Member

Federal Bar Association (Eastern District of Washington chapter)

Member

Federal Bar Association (Western District of Washington chapter)

Member

2014 - 2016

Spokane County Bar Association, Young Lawyers Division

Trustee

2010 - 2012

The William L. Dwyer American Inn of Court

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

In re: Matter of Recall Petition Pend Oreille County Fire District #2 Commissioners, Superior Court, Case No. 17-2-00150-0

The recall petition was denied.

Tamosaitis v. URS Energy & Construction, Inc., URS Corporation, CV-11-5157 (E.D. Wash 2011)

Trial judgment for client in the amount of $1,857,890 CAD; on appeal, 701 Fed.Appx. 565, No. 15-35198 (9th Cir. 2017) (affirming trial judgment)

Ford v. URS Energy & Construction, Inc, ALJ No. 2015 ERA-00010

Trial held, the Administrative Law Judge left employment with the Department of Labor without decision); plaintiff opted out of the Department of Labor, Ford v. AECOM, 18-CV-05101 (E.D. Wash 2018)

Ford v. AECOM, 18-CV-05101 (E.D. Wash 2018)

Brown v. BWSR, LLC, ARB No. 2019-0060, ALJ No. 2019-ERA-00003 (February 19, 2020)

Summary dismissal granted; upheld on appeal (February 19, 2010)

Kriegman, Chapter 11 Trustee v. 1127477 Alberta Ltd. and Keith Alexander, 2015 WL 328918, No. 2:12-CV-423 (E.D. Wash 2015)

Trial judgment for client in the amount of $1,857,890 CAD; on appeal, 701 Fed.Appx. 565, No. 15-35198 (9th Cir. 2017) (affirming trial judgment).

Kriegman, Chapter 11 Trustee v. 1140966 Alberta Ltd. and Marvin Toews, 2014 WL 3842979, No. 2:12-CV-68 (E.D. Wash 2014)

Trial judgment for client in the amount of $4,408,282.90

Contineo Technologies, Inc. v. Intrinium, Inc., Spokane County Superior Court, Case No. 16-2-04280-0

Trial held; no award to either party; client prevailed on fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims.

Brendt v. Spokane Washington Hospital Company LLC dba (Deaconess), Spokane County Superior Court, Case No. 15-2-01498-1

Trial held; full defense verdict for client.

Page v. Roberts, Spokane County District Court, Case No. 13145380

Trial held; judgment in favor of clients.

Lindell v. Bocook, 196 Wn. App. 1023 (2016)

Affirming district court decision to grant anti-harassment protection order in favor of client.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2011

University of Washington School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2008

Eastern Washington University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2020

Desert Bar CLE - January 2020

The Energy Reorganization Act's "Kick-Out Provision" - The Ultimate Forum Shopping Tool?

2016

Spokane Courts New Admittee CLE

Ethics Lessons for Young Lawyers - Ethics Panel

2011

William L. Dwyer American Inn of Court

“Voir Googling” - With guest speaker, Brian Grow, Senior Writer for law, Reuters Legal, author of “As Jurors Go Online, Trials Go Off Track.”

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution