Kurt M Rylander

Kurt M Rylander

5.0
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 31 years

Patent application Lawyer at Vancouver, WA
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Trademark Application, Litigation ... +2 more

406 W. 12th Street, Vancouver, WA

About Kurt

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Patent Application 30%

As a registered patent attorney, Mr. Rylander's patent practice includes drafting domestic and international patent applications and prosecution. He has prepared and prosecuted applications for patents in areas such as mechanical objects, software methods, electrical circuit boards, manufacturing methods, chemical objects and processes, chemical compositions, board games, electrical games and toys, explosive devices, motor vehicle apparatuses, and medical and dental instruments, among others.

27 years | 400 cases

30%
Copyright Infringement 20%

Mr. Rylander's copyright practice covers all aspects of copyright registration and enforcement. He aims at securing the greatest protection, regardless of the medium and form that it takes. Mr. Rylander has conducted suits for copyright infringement against numerous defendants, including the United States and private corporations, covering numerous areas of original expressions, such as paintings, software (structure, interactivity, and graphics), among others.

27 years | 20 cases

20%
Litigation 20%

He has tried numerous jury trials to verdict as lead trial attorney. He has represented plaintiffs and defendants in cases for patent infringement, trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and unfair competition, as well as government contract cases and general litigation in Federal courts. He has secured preliminary injunctions against infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and against hiring of key personnel pursuant to noncompetition and trade secret provisions.

32 years | 1,000 cases

20%
Trademark Application 20%

Mr. Rylander's trademark practice includes preparation, submission, and prosecution of applications for State and Federal trademark protection, as well as the conduct of appeals, and cancellation and opposition proceedings in Federal Courts and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

27 years | 260 cases

20%
Intellectual Property 10%

Mr. Rylander helps clients protect their intellectual property in whatever form it takes, whether invention, unique look, unique logo or name, confidential information, creative expression, industrial design. His representation includes patents, trademark and trade dress registrations, copyright registrations, contracts assigning work for hire ownership, protecting against unfair competition and protecting trade secrets, as well as contract due diligence and review for mergers and acquisitions.

27 years | 700 cases

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 27 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 30 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1995

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 31 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1994

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Rylander & Associates PC

406 W. 12th Street, Vancouver, WA, 98660-2801

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kurt M Rylander's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

5 star (4)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by anonymous | June 27, 2012

PATENT processing

Kurt is extremely sharp, prompt and to the point. He is also upfront and in my case was affordable compared to others.

Posted by John | October 15, 2008

Trademark registration and dispute

Kurt helped me get my trademarks registered at both the state and national level. When we had a dispute over who owned the trademark, Kurt pursued it very diligently. Eventually we won the battle. Later, when I sold the company, Kurt helped get all of the intellectual property rights moved acros...s properly

Posted by anonymous | October 15, 2008

CEO Oasis Diagnostics

Kurt has been very helpful in guiding my Company in the filing, upgrading, expansion and litigation of our intellectual property. Kurt is both enthusiatic about what he does and very knowledgeable about what he does. He is very protective of his clients' IP and I would have no hesitation in recomme...nding Kurt to cleints looking for a good Patent Counsel.

Posted by anonymous | October 15, 2008

Client Review

I've always been impressed with Kurt's professionalism and knowledge. I would gladly recommend his services.

See All Client Reviews

Kurt M Rylander's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kurt
Andrew William Wheeler headshot
Andrew Wheeler

Intellectual property lawyer | Nov 01

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I met Kurt when I served on the CCBA Board. I was impressed with his leadership, organization and the tenacious work that he undertook in the interests of the CCBA. It is clear that Kurt brings these same qualities to the representation of his clients. When it comes to intellectual property, patents, and trademark work in Clark County the only name on our firm referral list is Kurt Rylander."

Robert Charles Russell headshot
Robert Russell

Intellectual property lawyer | Feb 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

James D. Hamilton headshot
James Hamilton

Patent application lawyer | Dec 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Josephine C Townsend headshot
Josephine Townsend

Patent application lawyer | Jan 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Kurt is a very fine lawyer. Very intelligent and very friendly. He always has a smile and does not hesitate to answer questions. He is a frequent speaker at our CLE's and I enjoy his wit and humor. It is always nice, when the lawyer is also a nice guy and a friend."

Mark D. Walters headshot
Mark Walters

Intellectual property lawyer | Apr 14

Relationship: Co-worker

"Kurt is a lawyer's lawyer. He knows the law better than most attorneys, he considers all sides of the issues, and he offers objective and clear advise. His clients benefit greatly from working with one of the best lawyers I know who also happens to be a business owner, a great family man, and an aggressive trial attorney."

View All Endorsements
Josephine C Townsend headshot
Josephine Townsend

Administrative law lawyer

Mark Edward Beatty headshot
Mark Beatty

Intellectual property lawyer

Jon C Reali headshot
Jon Reali

Patent application lawyer

Mark D. Walters headshot
Mark Walters

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

2018

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

Appointed to Magistrate Review Panel, US District Court, Western District of Washington

2010

President, Clark County Bar Association

2009

Pro Bono Publico Service Commendation, Washington State Bar Association

2009

Trustee, Federal Bar Association, Western District of Washington

2009

Chair, Superior Court Bench Bar Committee, Clark County Bar Association

2009

Treasurer, Clark County Bar Association

2008

Trustee, Clark County Bar Association

2008

Special Appointment-Lawyer Representative to the Ninth Circuit, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington

2007

Chair, CLE Committee, Clark County Bar Association

2007

Chair, Superior Court Bench Bar Committee, Clark County Bar Association

2004

Lawyer Representative to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

2001

Mock Trial Judge, Oregon Fall Mock Trial Demonstration

1994

Juris Doctor, cum laude honors, Lewis & Clark Law School

1994

Am. Jur. Award for Excellence in Conflict of Laws, Lewis & Clark Law School

1993

Law Review Writing Contest Winner, Law Review of Lewis & Clark Law School

1993

Law Review Member, Lewis & Clark Law School

1992

Dean's Fellowship for Excellence in Academics, Lewis & Clark Law School

Work Experience

1999 - Present

Attorney, Rylander & Associates PC

1998 - 1999

Attorney, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP

1997 - 1999

Attorney, Martin & Rylander PC, Washington, DC

1994 - 1997

Associate, Riley & Artabane PC, Washington DC

Associations

2005 - Present

American Inns of Court

Barrister

2002 - Present

Washington State Patent Law Association

Member

2001 - Present

WSBA Section on Litigation

Member

2000 - Present

Canadian Intellectual Property Office

Registered Foreign Patent Attorney

2000 - Present

WSBA Section on Intellectual Property

Member

1999 - Present

Clark County Bar Association

Member

1998 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

1998 - Present

United States Patent & Trademark Office

Registered Patent Attorney

1995 - Present

District of Columbia Bar

Member

1995 - Present

Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States of America

Member

1994 - Present

Oregon State Bar

Member

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

2010 - 2011

Clark County Bar Association

President

2010 - 2011

Federal Bar Association

Nominating Committee Member

2009 - 2012

Federal Bar Association, Western District of Washington

Member

2007 - 2012

Rotary International

Member

2002 - 2008

Federal Circuit Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

iMerge Advisors v. TestudoData et al.

Representing the defendant, Kurt successfully got all claims against defendant dismissed and attorneys fees of over $150,000 awarded to his client

Perfect Company v. Adaptics, USDC. W.D. Wash.

After a Markman claim construction hearing, the Court adopted constructions proposed by Mr. Rylander

Custom Auto Interiors, Inc. v. Custom RV Interiors, Inc., Court of Appeals of Washington, Division II

Success. Reversed and vacated TRO

Proven Winners North America LLC v. Cascade Greenhouse et al., USDC W.D. Wash, C07-5361(BHS)

Success. Federal judge dismissed complaint for lack of standing

Campbell Pet Company v. Miale et al., _ F.3d _, 2008 WL 4249767 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2008)

Succeeeded in reversing lower court decision

See More Legal Cases

Education

1994

Lewis & Clark Law School

J.D. cum laude

1984

University of Washington -Seattle

B.A.

Speaking Engagements

2018

Washington State University, Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2018

iTech Preparatory Academy

Intellectual Property Law

2017

Washington State University, Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2016

Washington State University, Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2015

Washington State University, Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2014

Business Administration Class

IP Law for Business Majors

2013

IP Academy

IP Law

2013

CLE

Legal Ethics related to IP Trolling

2013

Capital Access Series

Protecting IP

2012

Graphic Design Class

Q&A with an IP Lawyer

2012

Clark County PubTalk

IP Update

2011

Washington State University, Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2010

Washington State University, Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2009

Washington State University Business Negotiation Class

Negotiation and the Law

2009

Lewis & Clark Law School Graduate Fellows Program

Business Development Basics

2009

Ethical Dilemmas for the Practicing Lawyer

Ethical Dilemmas-Litigation

2009

Continuing Legal Education

Litigation Bootcamp

2009

Continuing Legal Education

Lincoln on Professionalism

2009

CCBA Roast of Judge Robert Harris

Life and Times of Judge Robert Harris

2008

Washington State University Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2008

Continuing Legal Education

An Interview with U.S. District Court Judge Marsha J. Pechman

2008

Continuing Legal Education

A Selective Comparison fo State and Federal Civil Practice in Washington

2008

Continuing Legal Education

Ethical Dilemmas for the Practicing Lawyer-In House Counsel

2008

Camp Invention

Inventions and Patents

2007

Washington State University Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2007

Continuing Legal Education

Law Firm Practice Management

2007

Continuing Legal Education

Ethical Dilemmas for the Practicing Lawyer-Use of Experts

2006

Washington State University Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2006

Continuing Legal Education

Corporate Record Keeping for Fun and Profit

2005

Washington State University Business Department

Negotiation and the Law

2005

Continuing Legal Education

Overview of Intellectual Property

1995

U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Conference at the Capitol

Adarand and its Impact on Minority Owned Government Contractors

1995

Oneida Business Round Table

Adarand and the Impact on Minority Owned Government Contractors

Publications

2013

Vancouver Business Journal Inconceivable!

2013

Vancouver Business Journal A Rose By Any Other Name

2012

Vancouver Business Journal Common Product Development Mistakes

2012

Vancouver Business Journal Patents on a Purse String

2011

Vancouver Business Journal Innovation Financing Security

2008

Intellectual Property Today Stealth Expert

2000

WSTLA Trial News Inventors' Rights Act of 1999 Gives Inventors New Weapon

2000

Vancouver Bar Journal Protecting Your Invention,

1995

New York University School of Law Environmental Law Journal Saving a Disappearing Exemption to CERCLA Liability,

1995

The Federal Lawyer Is This The End Of Federal Minority Contracting?,

1995

American Environmental Laboratory A Review Of Federal Laboratory Credentials

1995

ABA Public Contract Law Journal Scanwell Plus: Challenging Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution