$ 300-300 per hour
David practice primary concerns wills, trusts, and estates (including probate and trust administration), with a smaller portion of his practice dedicated to real estate transactions. David enjoys developing relationships with his clients and helping clients achieve their goals to best protect themselves, their family, and their intentions.
Prior to starting Faber Feinson PLLC, David worked with Landesa on international land tenure issues, Perkins Coie on a major merger and acquisitions case, and the Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel as an associate attorney.
David and his wife Laura grew up in Port Townsend. They returned to their hometown in February 2014 after spending most of the last decade in other communities around the Puget Sound. David and Laura both attended the Evergreen State College, after which David received his J.D. from Seattle University School of Law, and his LL.M. from the University of Washington School of Law. David now lives a short walking distance from his office, and you'll probably see him wandering around uptown with his dog Leila on any given afternoon.
4
Practice Areas
13 years
13 years
13 years
13 years
$ 300-300 per hour
Sometimes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Washington
Acquired: 2012
No misconduct found
800 Polk Street, Suite B, Port Townsend, WA, 98368
9 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | General Knowledge
Posted by Scott | April 29, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
Poor
This attorney said he could have my case quickly resolved with a summery judgment. After spending my retainer he changed his mind, saying it may not work. At that point he had no plan so he did nothing except charging me for taking calls. At some point the plaintiff gave up on the suit and my atto...
I am sorry that Scott feels this way. When I first met with Scott, I informed him that I thought he had a reasonably strong case and that it might be possible that we could win on summary judgment early in the process. While further investigating the case, a material issue of fact presented itself which would have made a summary judgment motion unlikely to prevail. I informed Scott of the weakness in our case and offered to pursue a more rigorous defense, but outside of sending interrogatories and requests for admission, he insisted that he wanted to leave the ball in the plaintiff's proverbial court. Accordingly, I took a defensive position, assisted the client in responding to discovery requests from the plaintiff, and otherwise stuck to a holding pattern, prepared to respond if the plaintiff ever decided to move their case forward. Ultimately, the defense I prepared for my client was successful at discouraging the plaintiff from attempting to move forward with the case, and we ended with the result my client said he wanted at the beginning: the plaintiff was frustrated and unable to successfully prosecute his case. Eventually, the plaintiff decided to voluntarily withdraw their claims under CR 41(B)(2), which was the plaintiff's prerogative. I informed Scott of the plaintiff's intention, attempted to explain--both by email and phone--precisely what options remained after a CR 41(B)(2) voluntary dismissal had been filed: filing for attorney fees and initiating a new suit against the neighbor. When I asked the client whether he wanted to seek payment of his attorney fees--which remains a viable option after a CR 41(B)(2) dismissal--he stated he "doesn't want money" and that he wanted to force his neighbor to apologize. I informed him that I was unable to force the neighbor to do so. I also informed Scott that I would be unable to represent him on further suit against the neighbor and instead offered to refer Scott to other attorneys who work on the Olympic Peninsula. That was where this matter ended. I am honestly surprised Scott is this upset. I followed my client's directions, gave him careful advice throughout, and ultimately we were successful in defending the case.
Posted by anonymous | July 16, 2014 | Criminal Defense
Petitioners charges dropped
The petitioner charged me with the notion I was stalking her. I was fortunate to have found David Faber to help me through the court process. David listened carefully to my story followed through several times with questions to clarify the history of my relationship with the lady. David also r...
Posted by J | April 01, 2014 | Lawsuits & Disputes
Professional and Knowledgeable
David is extremely professional and knowledgeable. He was enthusiastic about taking on a complex and sensitive case. He communicated through every step of the process, taking care to make sure I was satisfied. My legal issues were resolved in a thorough, but timely manner.
"I've known David ever since law school. He's diligent, intelligent, and most importantly for a lawyer, he has actual life experience that he brings to bear in helping his clients. I unequivocally endorse him."
"I endorse this Mr. Faber. Mr. Faber is a capable no nonsense lawyer. He has handled many divorces and other family matters with a capable and caring manner. If you feel you may need the services of a attorney then a consultation with Mr. Faber is the first step."
Personal injury lawyer
DUI and DWI lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
2013
Roy L. Prosterman Leadership Award, University of Washington School of Law
2014 - Present
Partner, Faber Feinson PLLC
2013 - 2014
Associate, Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel
2014 - Present
Jefferson County Bar AssociationAttorney Member
2012 - Present
Washington State Bar AssociationAttorney Member
2015 - 2015
Jefferson County Bar AssociationVice President
Concluded
Court Order in Favor of Client
2013
LL.M - Master of Laws
2012
JD - Juris Doctor
2014
Employment Law
English
Legal Answers