Philip Arl Haas

Philip Arl Haas

4.6
Rating: 8.5

Licensed for 14 years

Litigation Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Business, Family

Smith Tower, 506 Second Avenue, Suite 1400, Seattle, WA

About Philip

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Litigation 34%

16 years

34%
Business 33%

16 years

33%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 12 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2013

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 14 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 2011

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 10 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2016

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

HAAS LAW, P.S.

Smith Tower, 506 Second Avenue, Suite 1400, Seattle, WA, 98104

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Philip Arl Haas's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.6 /5.0

16 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Bjorn | July 20, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Insurance

Bad experience!

Lots of great reviews but honestly i think they were there just for the money or just hugely NOT competent at all. I had an issues with an insurance claim, them denying my claim even though they couldn’t prove they weren’t liable. I was very clear from the start that my moving company made the in...surance with the insurance company and that I did not have any documentation regarding the Pick-Up but only regarding my Drop-Off. 1. Phone consultation with Maureen, of course she can’t predict the outcome but the consultation was quite specific as to know if there was a strong case, which she said there was, she also said the proof of being liable or not, was on the insurance company side that’s why they have investigators. 2. Philip Haas calls, I find out that Maureen is not my lawyer but he will be, never spoke to him before and with a non-disclosed speech impediment that makes communication hugely hard (first bad sign, she should have contacted me telling me and asking if that was ok before taking a non refundable deposit). 3. You would think that if you change your clients lawyer without consulting with the client you’d provide every bit of information that very client provided you; NO, not the case, Philip Haas started doing his own without even consulting first and knowing half of the case; I got mad and made him aware of it and he apologized saying Maureen didn’t send him the info (hugely unprofessional and once again a very bad sign); because I did send details by email there were no way you could dispute it so he wrote off what he charged me so far with whatever he did without consulting me first and then made out a strategy plan with me starting from zero (that was well appreciated but not encouraging). 4. If you know the case and set up a strategy but then a month later forget about details regarding that case...VERY BAD SIGN. Philip Haas blamed it on the fact they just had a new born and thanked me for reminding him the details of my case and because of that now he would re-contact the insurance company (he should have done that immediately as soon as he got another “claim denied”). 5. Out of the blue turns out that the burden of proof that the insurance company is liable or not, is on me and not on the insurance company so even though the insurance company can’t prove they aren’t liable, I have to prove they are by providing documents of the truck and driver that did my pick-up... SURPRISE! So my lawyer knowing from the start I did not have any documents alike as I specified from the beginning with Maureen, at the very end let’s me know I have the burden of proof which, not having documents is clear that there is no case at all then, that’s just common sense right? ... can you prove in a very specific way who the driver and truck type is? NO, you don’t have a case, so why on earth would you take a case knowing there is no case? Because you mislead and was there for the money OR just were hugely incompetent not knowing what you were doing. Philip Haas insists they didn’t mislead, which can be true but that just means they were hugely incompetent then, which one is it? A. The insurance company have to prove they are not liable and if they can’t the burden for compensation is on them at least partially. (Maureen) -“ knowing I didn’t have documentation to prove specifics regarding the pick-up driver and truck type. Or B. You have to prove the insurance company is liable (even though you were insured) in order for them to compensate you by providing documents of who the driver and truck type was (Philip) Both are contradicting each other and therefore misleading or simply pure incompetence in the matter. Federal court? That was an option it would just have been hugely costly and time consuming and no guarantee of anythings pf course. Bad experience and a huge waste of money!

Posted by David | October 24, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Libel & Slander

Defamation case

Philip handed my defamation case in a profession manner and I was awarded a settlement.

Posted by J & S | May 04, 2015 | Child Custody

Beyond excited

After having my last 2 lawyers disappoint me to no end inside and outside of the court room, then quit my case for their own personal reasons and finding out that no work had been done in preparation for the Parenting plan modification with only 30 days to the court date. I called Haas Law Office an...d spoke with Mauree, she was very concerned for me and our situation with my son, she asked all the right questions listened to my story and helped me understand what could possibly be done in our situation and then set up an appointment to meet with Philip for the same day! We met with Philip at a Starbucks on my way home from work, in desperate need of help. Philip amazed both of us!! He listened to everything we both had to say (and it was a lot) he looked over ever document we gave him and he asked the questions that kept us on track. After our meeting we offered to help carry the two huge boxes of court papers, I brought with me, out to his car. Philip replied “No thank you, I am going to get started right now” OMG!! We are so happy and thankful to have this team working with us, so happy we cried tears of joy and relief on the way home :O)

Posted by Ruth Rhodes | May 07, 2014 | Business

Highly recommended!

I am an attorney in Melbourne, Florida, and Mr. Haas and his wife Maureen provided me with valuable legal assistance with some commercial litigation cases I was handling. They were both very responsive and professional, and they provided high quality legal work. I highly recommend Mr. Haas.

See All Client Reviews

Philip Arl Haas's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Philip
Dustin Michael Smith headshot
Dustin Smith

Appeals lawyer | Jun 22

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Philip Duston Bartlett III headshot
Philip Bartlett III

Litigation lawyer | May 14

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Haas was an associate at my law firm for about one year. During his time at the firm he handled numerous cases to successful completion and was able to maintain excellent relationships with our clients."

Rachel Maria Kulhavy headshot
Rachel Kulhavy

Family lawyer | May 04

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer for his professionalism."

Michael S. Welch headshot
Michael Welch

Litigation lawyer | Apr 15

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer."

Joseph J. Kenneff headshot
Joseph Kenneff

Unknown lawyer | Jan 06

Relationship: Friend

"I endorse this lawyer."

Eric Corey Abramson headshot
Eric Abramson

Unknown lawyer | Oct 17

Relationship: Friend

"Philip Haas is an outstanding attorney who is more-than-willing to put in the extra work in order to obtain satisfactory results for his clients."

Maureen Elizabeth Haas headshot
Maureen Haas

Unknown lawyer | Sep 25

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Robert L Rutt headshot
Robert Rutt

Unknown lawyer | Aug 14

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Having worked with Mr. Haas in the past, I have first hand knowledge of his dedication to providing his clients with the best representation possible. Mr. Haas is very knowledgeable in family law and will fight for his clients' rights in every case. Whenever I had a question regarding a family law issue, Mr. Haas was more than willing to help provide me with an answer. Mr. Haas is an excellent young attorney who is a true professional and I learned a lot working with him."

View All Endorsements
Joseph Michael Costyn headshot
Joseph Costyn

Business lawyer

Kevin Matthew Welch headshot
Kevin Welch

Intellectual property lawyer

David Lutz headshot
David Lutz

Family lawyer

Mathew Michael Purcell headshot
Mathew Purcell

Family lawyer

Jules R Butler headshot
Jules Butler

Family lawyer

Dustin Michael Smith headshot
Dustin Smith

Criminal defense lawyer

Brian Hughes Howley headshot
Brian Howley

Appeals lawyer

Ruth Celia Rhodes headshot
Ruth Rhodes

Litigation lawyer

Rachel Maria Kulhavy headshot
Rachel Kulhavy

Patent infringement lawyer

Michael S. Welch headshot
Michael Welch

Workers compensation lawyer

Philip Duston Bartlett III headshot
Philip Bartlett III

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer

Richard Martin Nazareth II headshot
Richard Nazareth

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer

Eric Corey Abramson headshot
Eric Abramson

Criminal defense lawyer

Robert Kobina Winful headshot
Robert Winful

General practice lawyer

Joseph J. Kenneff headshot
Joseph Kenneff

Criminal defense lawyer

Maureen Elizabeth Haas headshot
Maureen Haas

Family lawyer

Christopher Charles Pennington headshot
Christopher Pennington

General practice lawyer

Robert L Rutt headshot
Robert Rutt

General practice lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.5 (Excellent)

Honors

2009

Commercial Law Book Award, Barry University School of Law

Work Experience

2013 - 2013

Assistant Regional Counsel / Contract Attorney, Office Of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel (5th District)

2011 - 2012

Attorney, The Bartlett Law Firm

2011 - 2012

Freelance Legal Writer, Nolo

Associations

2017 - Present

Oregon State Bar, Intellectual Property Section

Member

2016 - Present

Washington State Bar Association, Solo and Small Practice Section

Member

2016 - Present

Oregon State Bar, Sole and Small Firm Practitioners Section

Member

2014 - Present

King County Bar Association

Member

2014 - Present

Washington State Bar Association, Family Law Section

Member

2017 - 2017

Oregon State Bar, Business Law Section

Member

2012 - 2015

Brevard County Bar Association

Member

2012 - 2013

Indian River County Bar Association

Member

2011 - 2013

Orange County Bar Association

Member

2011 - 2013

Brevard County Legal Aid, Inc.

Volunteer Attorney

Sample of Legal Cases

Larson v. Burnett

Successful Defense of Personal Injury Claims

See More Legal Cases

Education

2011

Barry University Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2011

Seton Hall University School of Law

2010

Texas A&M University

2009

College of William and Mary, Marshall-Wythe School of Law

Publications

2010

Nolo Multiple Personal Injury Articles (30-40)

Languages

German

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution