Peter Justin Viteznik

Peter Justin Viteznik

4.1
Rating: 7.6

Licensed for 31 years

Construction and development Lawyer at Portland, OR
Practice Areas: Construction & Development, Commercial, General Practice, Real Estate

2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 780, Portland, OR

About Peter

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 30 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1995

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 31 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1994

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Peter Justin Viteznik

2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 780, Portland, OR, 97210

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Peter Justin Viteznik's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.1 /5.0

14 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (14) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Ashleigh | January 27, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Car Accidents

10 out of 10 for Peter & team

I was involved in a car accident where I was not at fault so I at contacted and hired Peter to help me with a car insurance claim because I felt the insurance company was not being fair. I couldn’t recommend Peter enough because He and his team were so responsive, organized and they won my case! This... was my first time going through the legal process so I was nervous and not sure what to expect. But Peter and team constantly communicated with me and took so much stress off my plate. My only regret was not reaching out to Peter sooner. They earned my trust and I would tell anyone to reach out to Peter.

Posted by Brad | February 14, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Construction & Development

Highly Recommend Pete and his team!

We received a recommendation to hire Pete Viteznik about 15 years ago to handle a complicated construction defect case. This was unfamiliar territory for our company and Pete proved to be the right person for the job. It was evident from the very beginning that Pete and his team possess the knowled...ge, expertise and professionalism required to navigate a complicated situation. He clearly defined what he needed from us and then plainly outlined his plan to help us succeed. His communication through the entire process was excellent. We would have regular in person meetings to review each milestone in the case, but in addition, he would call as soon as new information came to light that he felt we would like to know. Pete has always proven to be personal, reliable and accessible. I have called him on numerous occasions for the simplest of questions and he has always been delighted to help in any way. We have worked with Pete and his team ever since that first case and can strongly recommend him to anyone else.

Posted by Geoff | February 11, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Fantastic service and attention

We were the plaintiff against a window installer. We were listened to, the entire firm worked quickly, and was very responsive. Peter and Lee did a fantastic job taking the time to explain and talk through everything. We settled for a sufficient amount, and Peter was able to get us the settlement... for minimal effort and cost on their end. Though I hope not to have to hire them again, they'll be our first call if we need another attorney.

Posted by anonymous | October 26, 2018 | Residential

Avoid This Lawyer

Peter Viteznik represented me in a residential real Estate and HOA dispute. Throughout almost a 2- year ordeal and close to $18000 in expenses, I was sorely disappointed with his communication with me, attendance to details, and the lack of legal knowledge. The only reason I could not get out e...arlier was that I had already invested quite a bit in his representation. A huge and expensive mistake, especially when I had to start paying the opposition's lawyers too.

Posted by John | October 26, 2018 | Construction & Development

Good Case Lost at Summary Judgment - My Terrible and Expensive Experience with Peter J Viteznik

Pete handled a construction defect case on my behalf. A recently purchased home required nearly $400,000 in repairs. I hired Viteznik to recoup my repair costs from the builder and seller of the home. The builder/seller knew, and chose not to disclose, the known construction deficiencies that led ...to multiple water penetration issues. In my opinion, Peter J Viteznik's overconfidence, lack of preparation, and personal life distractions resulted in my case being dismissed on summary judgment. Viteznik didn't even bother to tell me that there was a summary judgment hearing. To make matters worse, I learned later, at a hearing for the motion for reconsideration, that because of a "personal conflict" Viteznik didn't even show up for the MSJ hearing and instead sent a junior associate, with little to no knowledge or expertise relating to my case, to the MSJ hearing. Court records confirm Viteznik's absence at the MSJ hearing. After the case was lost, I asked Viteznik, his current firm of Kilmer, Voorhees & Laurick, P.C., and his formal firm of Bullivant, Houser, and Bailey, PC to fund my appeal and they declined. It is one thing to make a mistake in life and quite another to deny it. Thankfully, I found two lawyers in Seattle that took the case to the appellate court and received a full reversal on ALL FIVE ARGUMENTS. In the end, the value of my valid claim was eroded because of the large amount of time that had elapsed between the original filing, appellate reversal, and settlement conference. Viteznik made money on my good case and I lost close to $600,000 (including legal fees).

See All Client Reviews

Peter Justin Viteznik's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Peter

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.6 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2008 - Present

Partner and Shareholder, Kilmer, Voorhees & Laurick, P.C.

1996 - 2008

Partner and Shareholder, Bullivant Houser Bailey

1994 - 1996

Associate, Stewart Sokol and Grey

Associations

2007 - 2008

Oregon State Bar, Construction Law Section

Past President

Education

1994

Willamette University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

Oregon State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2020

LEAP Seminar

LEAP Negotiation Best Practices

2014

Legal and Professional Education

Use & Abuse of the Complex Construction Case Program

2012

Oregon Law Institute

Deconstructing the Construction Litigation Case

2011

2011 Oregon and Washington Construction Law: Comparison and Contrast

Construction Defect Claims and Pre-Claim Notice Requirements

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution