p. v. NT
Apr 25, 1911OUTCOME: .14 dismiss endangerment no jail and n loss license
refusal ,14 ba dui and several counts child endangerment
John Joseph VanDervoort's Legal Cases (46)
Chico, CA
DUI and DWI Lawyer at Chico, CA
Practice Areas: DUI & DWI, Criminal Defense ... +2 more
People v R.C.
N/AOUTCOME: drunk driving reduced to DRY reckless
D was arrested by park and recreation cop for speeding and weaving over yellow etc. I showe park and Rec cop really a wanna-bee chp dui cop and that he stakes out casinos.We won the DMV APS hearing. ... We had expert showing rising ba case and investigator who interviewed numerous witnesses and cops re park and rec cop wanting to be "real" CHP cop. D was a cool client.
People v. S.C.
N/AOUTCOME: Refusal to wet on terrible facts
D ran stop sign and was exhibiting speed. His refusal was digitally recorded. My investigator found witnesses who showed cops facts totally wrong and or exaggerated. Multi motions and pictures and ... investigator showed cop could not have seen what he swore to at DMV hearing..The refusal itself was terrible and no denial of it, but cop was a jerk and he showed his colors when properly cross-examined. Client followed instructions well. This case could have been and looked like a disaster at first
People v. D.A.
N/AOUTCOME: .10 with marijuana and bad admissions reduced
D had .10 breath and bad driving and brake light out. Pitchess and investigator indicated cop staked out bar and wanted to "encounter' this blonde...a pitchess motion with 30 other clients filed re ar ... resting cop and his partner showed a propensity to systematically deny choice of tests an in my opinion gendere bias. case redued to wet reckless no jail 12 hour school..Had investigator, expert and Pitchess motion among other motions. D a bartender....good for business!
People v M.W.
N/AOUTCOME: dui reduced to wet reckless
client had .11 BA but it was one of the two bad cops in Chico mentioned in the other cases above and pitchess motion and other discovery motions and motions to compel and motions to supress were done a ... nd we had an investigator and expert toxicologist from Sacramento. We REALLY had evidence the two cops were both dirty in this one. They had pulled over client other times on numerous occassions when he was not even drinking, once when he had a relative of cop in his car!!
People v L.B.
N/AOUTCOME: Drugs& dui ..no jail no loss license
This case involved H&S section 11550 and dui....got client into rehab...no jail and H&S code and drving under influence of drugs dismissed..very important because of job sensitivity......
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
