No Photo

David Harold Fuller

Licensed for 47 years

Child custody Lawyer at Santa Rosa, CA
Practice Areas: Child Custody

448 Sebastopol Ave, Santa Rosa, CA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About David

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 47 years

State: California

Acquired: 1978

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of David Harold Fuller

448 Sebastopol Ave, Santa Rosa, CA, 95401-8501

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

David Harold Fuller's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (3) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 3
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Responsiveness

Posted by SCROOGE | December 28, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Litigation

batting a 1,000 seems to be fiitting

the other 2 reviews are spot on, he was my dump truck for 10+ months. and all i can say is YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED......AND I MEAN WARNED.. SENDS ME DOCUMENTS TO REVISE AND CORRECT THE DAY AFTER"" THE COURT HEARING THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR.. NOT ONLY THAT BUT THERE UPSIDE DOWN AND BLURY....... I WOULD LOVE TO KEEP GOING BUT... WELL ILL JUST COPY AND PASTE MY COMPLAINT TO THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA........ *1 MR. FULLER KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY WITHHELD KEY DOCUMENTS THAT I PROVIDED HIM TO PRESENT TO THE COURTS ON MY BEHALF AS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THAT DISPROVED THE STATEMENTS AND ACCUSATIONS ABOUT MY CONDUCT THAT WERE MADE AND REPORTED UNDER OATH BY COUNTY EMPLOYEES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER COURT HEARINGS SPANNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE COURTS INVOLVEMENT. MR. FULLER ADMITTED TO ME VIA. EMAIL THAT HE DID NOT PROVIDE THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TO THE COURTS THAT I PROVIDED TO HIM TO SUBMIT ON MY BEHALF BECAUSE, DUE TO ALLEGATIONS ABOUT A MISTAKE I MADE TOWARDS THE END OF THE COURT PROCEEDINGS ( 9 MONTHS LATER ) THAT IT WAS NOT IMPORTANT TO DISPROVE ALLEGATIONS AND STATEMENTS THAT THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES MADE IN SWORN DECLARATIONS AS WELL AS STATEMENTS MADE UNDER OATH BEFORE THE COURTS.. OVER A 9 MONTH PROCEEDING... ULTIMATELY INVOKING A GRAVE NEGATIVE DISPOSITION AGAINST ME IN OVERALL... EVEN THOUGH THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRETY OF THE CASE MR. FULLER AGREED THAT WHAT THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES WERE DOING WAS NOT ONLY MORALLY WRONG BUT IT WAS ALSO LEGALLY WRONG. *2 FURTHERMORE, I HAD TO MAKE SEVERAL REQUESTS THAT SPANNED ALMOST 6 WEEKS FOR MR. FULLER TO PROVIDE ME WITH THE LEAGAL DOCUMENTS, REPORTS AND ARTICLES THAT PERTAINED TO MY CASE. WHICH I FINALLY RECEIVED VIA. U.S.P.S. PROVIDING DATED POSTMARKS. AT THAT POINT, THE COURTS HAD ALREADY PROCEEDED BEYOND SUCH MATTERS DISCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS, *3 ALSO ON THE COUPLE OCCASIONS MR. FULLER SENT ME ( VIA EMAIL ) THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS SURROUNDING MY UPCOMMING COURT HEARINGS, I.E. SUPLEMENTAL PETITIONS BEING FILED AGAINST ME AND OR "CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS" DECLARATIONS THAT WOULD BE SUBMITTED ON MY BEHALF, WERE SENT TO ME UPSIDE DOWN AND SO BLURRY I COULD NOT EVEN READ THEM. EVEN THOUGH I INFORMED HIM OF THIS EVERY TIME HE CONTINUED TO SEND THEM IN THIS MANNER. *4 ALSO, IN REGARDS TO A MORE RECENT COURT HEARING WE HAD WHICH WAS ON THE 10TH OF DECEMBER 2020, MR. FULLER DID NOT PROVIDE ME WITH THE THE DECLARATION OF CORRECTIONS DOCUMENT UNTIL DECEMBER 11TH 2020, REGARDING THE PREVIOUS HEARINGS PETITION THAT WAS FILED ON NOVEMBER 9TH 2020 ) THIS DECLERATION HAD TO BE SUBMITTED ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 9TH 2020 FOR THE COURTS TO GO OVER THEM FOR THE DECEMBER 10TH HEARING, MR FULLER THEN PROCEEDED TO ARGUE WITH ME ABOUT SENDING THEM "A FEW DAYS AGO" WHICH THERE IS NO SUCH DOCUMENT DATED PRE-DECEMBER 11TH 2020. HE AVOIDED FURTHER INGAGEMENT ABOUT THIS SHORTLY THERE AFTER. VOIDING MY ABILITY TO SUBMIT THE "ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS" PETITION DECLARATION TO THE COURTS. THEREFORE THE COURTS ACCEPTED THE STATEMENTS IN THE PETITION FILED AGAINST ME ON NOV, 9TH AS TRUE AND FACTUAL. THIS ALSO HAD A SEVERE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE PROGRESS OF MY CASE.

Posted by Keith | February 21, 2013 | Lawsuits & Disputes

This has to be the absolute worst attorney EVER! He was appointed to represent me in a custody matter. He has since refused to m

This guy doesn't call you back. Doesn't file anything you ask him to. Will not allow you to speak in court. Refuses to see you when you come to his office after call 10 times in 4 days. He's the worst attorney EVER! Do not use him. Find somebody else. A person with no law background could do a better... job

See All Client Reviews

David Harold Fuller's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse David

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

N/A

University of California, Hastings College of the Law

N/A

University of San Francisco School of Law

N/A

University of California - Davis

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution