|Award name||Grantor||Date granted|
|Association name||Position name||Duration|
|State Bar of California||Member||N/A|
|Bar Association of San Francisco, Family Law Section||Member||N/A|
|University of California, Hastings College of the Law||Law||JD - Juris Doctor||1986|
|San Francisco State University||N/A||N/A||N/A|
Posted by anonymous
I had an awful experience with Rubin & Levavi. Their "defense" of me in Family Court consisted of admitting guilt and contrition for what wasn't a crime, but rather an unchallenged perception. I became responsible for what a school staff person privately said to a student (characterizing me & describing the nature of an otherwise ambiguous "incident"). It mattered what the student thought, yet not where the prejudicial information came from, the unmonitored staff-to-student communication violating school procedures and qualifying as psychological child abuse. The attorney work-product gets high marks for effusive deference to robe-wearing authority.
Lawyers should spot missing witness testimony (the number of actors different than the number of written statements). A friend of mine did (free), though too late. I like Nancy, and her daughter, but legally would only use them to establish an alibi.
Endorsements from fellow lawyers are an important consideration for many when selecting the right attorney. Be the first to endorse your colleague!
Claiming your profile is free and easy.
Highlight your practice areas, experience, and contact information.
Showcase your speaking engagements, awards, case histories, and more.