Teddy Kite Joe

Teddy Kite Joe

also known as Ted K. Joe

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.1

Licensed for 19 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410, San Francisco, CA

About Teddy

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Intellectual Property 100%

I am a registered Patent Attorney and a member of the California State Bar. My focus includes protecting and enforcing U.S. and foreign patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, as well as managing intellectual property portfolios and advising on intellectual property strategy.

21 years

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 265-265 per hour


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 19 years

State: California

Acquired: 2006

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Dergosits & Noah LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410, San Francisco, CA, 94111

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Teddy Kite Joe's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Teddy Kite Joe's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Teddy

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.1 (Very Good)

Honors

2004

John L. Brennan Award for Creativity and Innovation in Advocacy, University of San Francisco School of Law Intensive Advocacy Program

Work Experience

2006 - Present

Associate, Dergosits & Noah LLP

Associations

Asian American Bar Association

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

San Francisco Intellectual Property Law Association

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Sample of Legal Cases

U.S. Patent No. 7,601,655 (issued Oct. 13, 2009)

Issued utility patent

Robolaw Corporation v. Matrix Learning Systems, Inc.

Dismissed - Settled

U.S. Patent No. D599,113 (issued Sept. 1, 2009)

Issued design patent

U.S. Patent No. D597,380 (issued Aug. 4, 2009)

Issued design patent

Ours Technology, Inc. v. Data Drive Thru, Inc.

Judgment - Motion Before Trial

Newegg, Inc. v. Telecommunication Systems, Inc.

Transfer/Remand - Transfer to Another District

Advanced Biological Laboratories S.A. v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University et al.

Dismissed - Voluntarily

Next Innovation, LLC v. Visteon Corporation

Statistical Closing

U.S. Patent No. D593,368 (issued June 2, 2009)

Issued design patent

Teknowledge Corporation v. Cellco Partnership

Judgment - Other

U.S. Patent No. D583,505 (issued Dec. 23, 2008)

Issued design patent

Yieldboost Tech Inc. v. Photon Dynamics Inc.

Dismissed - Voluntarily

U.S. Patent No. D583,100 (issued Dec. 16, 2008)

Issued design patent

U.S. Patent No. D582,099 (issued Dec. 2, 2008)

Issued design patent

U.S. Patent No. D582,100 (issued Dec. 2, 2008)

Issued design patent

Slide, Inc. v. Paid Post, Inc. et al.

Dismissed - Voluntarily

U.S. Patent No. 7,433,883 (issued Oct. 7, 2008)

Issued utility patent

U.S. Patent No. D577,302 (issued Sept. 23, 2008)

Issued design patent

U.S. Patent No. D572,538 (issued July 8, 2008)

Issued design patent

Tan v. Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc. et al.

Dismissed - Settled

U.S. Patent No. D568,110 (issued May 6, 2008)

Issued design patent

U.S. Patent No. D568,111 (issued May 6, 2008)

Issued design patent

U.S. Patent No. D568,112 (issued May 6, 2008)

Issued design patent

U.S. Patent No. D567,077 (issued Apr. 22, 2008)

Issued design patent

Arete Power, Inc. v. Beacon Power Corporation

Transfer/Remand - Transfer to Another District

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. et al v. Bhandari et al.

Judgment - Judgment on Consent

CIBA Specialty Chemicals v. CMC Magnetics Corporation et al.

Dismissed - Voluntarily

Robolaw Corporation v. DeVry, Inc.

Dismissed - Settled

U.S. Patent No. D549,393 (issued Aug. 21, 2007)

Issued design patent

Next Innovation, LLC v. Onstar Corporation et al.

Dismissed - Voluntarily

FusionArc, Inc. v. Solidus Networks, Inc.

Stayed - Defendant bankrupt

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080249994

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080086485

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080093398

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080196575

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080228479

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080235218

U.S. Patent No. 7,730,146 (issued June 1, 2010)

Issued utility patent

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080150255

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20100100959

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20100100963

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20100100591

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20100100939

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20070294166

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20070287630

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080268930

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080306820

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080313236

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20080313385

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20090089344

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20090089395

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20090089522

U.S. Patent Publication No. 20090089862

Textscape, LLC v. Google, Inc.

Yieldboost Technologies, Inc. v. Photon Dynamics, Inc. et al.

Spectros Corp. v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

Genesis Medical Interventional, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical Inc.

Textscape LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated

Exergetic Systems, LLC v. Energy Future Holding Corp et al.

Vinovation, Inc. et al. v. VA Filtration USA LLC

See More Legal Cases

Education

2005

University of San Francisco School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

University of Texas System, Austin

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

Languages

English

Mandarin

Cantonese

German

Spanish

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution