Charles Marriott Kagay

Charles Marriott Kagay

4.5
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 49 years

Appeals Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Appeals

96 Jessie Street, San Francisco, CA

About Charles

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 49 years

State: California

Acquired: 1976

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Complex Appellate Litigation Group, LLP

96 Jessie Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Charles Marriott Kagay's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.5 /5.0

8 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (8) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Communication Style

Posted by anonymous | January 25, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Appeals

Poor Effort

He did an appellate review case without reviewing the entire file. He based his whole legal arguments on two legal arguments that were made in the Superior Court Case and skipped over the part where the court invited appellants to show why a jury would not believe the allegations/findings made. He fa...iled to exert enough effort to understand those issues so he could not make effective arguments. When I pointed this out to him, he did not even bother to reply, nor did he attempt to get a second appearance with the court after they made faulty conclusions that should have been rebutted.

See All Client Reviews

Charles Marriott Kagay's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Charles
Scott Anthony McMillan headshot
Scott McMillan

Antitrust and trade law lawyer | Jul 20

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Charles M. Kagay is a brilliant lawyer, and performs his work with equanimity despite the most desperate or fluid of circumstances. Charles Kagay's name is on some of the most important cases in California regarding Civil Procedure, including Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield, Cel-Tech, etc. "

View All Endorsements
Jonathan Ian Nirenberg headshot
Jonathan Nirenberg

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2018

Northern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Certified Specialist - Appellate Law, State Bar of California - Certified Specialist

2011

Certified Specialist - Appellate Law, State Bar of California - Certified Specialist

2006

Certified Specialist - Appellate Law, State Bar of California - Certified Specialist

2001

Certified Specialist - Appellate Law, State Bar of California - Certified Specialist

Work Experience

2023 - Present

Partner, Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP

1995 - Present

Special Deputy Attorney General - intermittent, California Department of Justice

2016 - 2023

Of Counsel, California Appellate Law Group

2012 - 2023

Principal, Spiegel Liao & Kagay, PC

2001 - 2006

Chief Appellate Counsel, Office of Independent Counsel in re Cisneros

1995 - 2002

Chief Appellate Counsel, Office of Independent Counsel in re Espy

1985 - 2012

Partner, Spiegel Liao & Kagay, LLP

1976 - 1985

Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice

Associations

2013 - 2018

International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms

Chairman, Board of Directors

2013 - 2018

International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms

President

Sample of Legal Cases

Young v. Tri-City Healthcare District, 210 Cal.App.4th 35 (2012)

Reversed; mandamus action reinstated.

Mileikowsky v. West Hills Hospital and Medical Center, 45 Cal.4th 1259 (2009)

Hearing officer's order overturned.

UAS Management, Inc., v. Mater Misericordiae Hospital, 169 Cal.App.4th 357 (2008)

Summary judgment reversed.

Yaqub v. Salinas Valley Memorial Healthcare System, 122 Cal. App.4th 474 (2004)

Writ of administrative mandamus granted

Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. L.A. Cellular Telephone Co., 20 Cal 4th 163 (1999)

Unfair competition claims reinstated.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1976

Harvard University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1976

Harvard University Kennedy School of Government

M.P.P.

1972

Harvard College

A.B.

Speaking Engagements

2017

California MCLE

"Appellate Tips for Real Property Trial Lawyers"

2006

Section Education Institute

“How Not to Lose Your Appeal in the Trial Court”

2005

Annual Bar Meeting

“Win the Appeal Before Trial: An Appellate Lawyer’s Guide to Perfecting Pretrial Appeals for Trial Lawyers”

2002

California CLE

“Litigating the Class Action Lawsuit in California”

Publications

2012

A Thomson Reuters offering on the WestlawNext legal research platform Practitioner Insights

2002

Competition Vol. 11, No. 1 “How ‘Federal’ Is California Summary Judgment Law after Aguilar?”
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution