No Photo

Arthur Steven Beeman

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review

Licensed for 42 years

Patent application Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Intellectual Property

201 Spear St Ste 1100, San Francisco, CA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Arthur

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 20 years

State: California

Acquired: 2005

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Kentucky for 29 years

State: Kentucky

Acquired: 1996

Former Member

No misconduct found

Licensed in Ohio for 42 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1983

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Beeman & Muchmore, LLP

201 Spear St Ste 1100, San Francisco, CA, 94105-6164

Beeman & Muchmore, LLP

201 Spear St Ste 1100, San Francisco, CA, 94105-6164

Law Offices of Arthur Steven Beeman

201 Spear St Ste 1100, San Francisco, CA, 94105-6164

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Arthur Steven Beeman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Arthur Steven Beeman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Arthur

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

N/A

Northwestern University School of Law

Publications

2007

Personal Information and the Lanham Act Personal Information and the Lanham Act

2006

IP Litigator, March/April 2006 Juries and Patent Cases: Effective Presentation of the Inventor's Case to the Jury

2005

Two Howard, Rice Partners Jump to DLA Two Howard, Rice Partners Jump to DLA

1001

INTERNET LAW - Jury Decision in CollegeNET, Inc. v. XAP Corporation Expands Application of the Lanham Act to Internet Companies INTERNET LAW - Jury Decision in CollegeNET, Inc. v. XAP Corporation Expands Application of the Lanham Act to Internet Companies
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution