Matthew Jason Gluck

Matthew Jason Gluck

also known as Matt Gluck

1.0
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 23 years

Lawsuits and disputes Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Lawsuits & Disputes, Real Estate, Business

220 Montgomery St Ste 1850, San Francisco, CA

About Matthew

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Lawsuits and Disputes 25%

I have handled many different types of litigation matters, including contract disputes, partnership matters, business torts, negligence, fraud, insurance coverage matters, construction defect matters, homeowners association disputes, charitable trusts, and more

24 years | 50 cases

25%
Litigation 25%

I have handled many different types of litigation matters, including contract disputes, partnership matters, business torts, negligence, fraud, insurance coverage matters, construction defect matters, homeowners association disputes, charitable trusts, and more

24 years | 50 cases

25%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 9999-9999 per hour

Contingency

1%-99%

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 23 years

State: California

Acquired: 2002

Active

No misconduct found

Location

The Law Office of Matthew J. Gluck

220 Montgomery St Ste 1850, San Francisco, CA, 94104-3531

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Matthew Jason Gluck's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (0)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by anonymous | August 9, 2023 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Take your case just for the money, not even a specialist in your legal issues.

Not litigator, refuse to act and spent $50,000 on just simple motions. Arrogant attitude probably upset the judge. 90% of attorneys don't want to go to court, but keep demanding more money constantly. Very tough to find lawyers, AI should bring down the legal extortion profession Legal sys...tem is a robbery and bring America production down. Parasites.

See All Client Reviews

Matthew Jason Gluck's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Matthew
Kevin Samuel Sullivan headshot
Kevin Sullivan

Litigation lawyer | Jun 16

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Mr. Gluck is a fine lawyer who intelligently represents his clients. We opposed each other in three lawsuits in one case and I always found him to be well prepared and thought out."

Lisa Stockholm headshot
Lisa Stockholm

Litigation lawyer | May 23

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Matt is one of the smartest people I have ever met. He possesses both brilliant legal reasoning skills, and excellent people skills. Matt's analytical skills allow him to tackle complex legal issues, and to devise the well-supported arguments that make Matt so successful in motion practice. Matt's communication skills enable him to be an effective negotiator who is often able to resolve disputes where the parties were previously at an impasse. In sum, Matt delivers tremendous value to clients by delivering top-notch legal services as efficiently as possible, and by developing creative solutions that often can help avoid unnecessary litigation."

Alicia Maria Gamez headshot
Alicia Gamez

Litigation lawyer | May 23

Relationship: Co-worker

"I have worked with Matt and hired him to work matters with me. He is dependable, responsive, and on point. A great lawyer."

Andrew Ryan Neilson headshot
Andrew Neilson

Litigation lawyer | Feb 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Honest and smart."

View All Endorsements
Susan G. Bluer headshot
Susan Bluer

Employment and labor lawyer

Alicia Maria Gamez headshot
Alicia Gamez

Litigation lawyer

Andrew Ryan Neilson headshot
Andrew Neilson

Litigation lawyer

Richard Fritz Munzinger headshot
Richard Munzinger

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Work Experience

2002 - 2012

Attorney, Shartsis Friese LLP

Associations

2013 - Present

Bar Association of San Francisco, Solo and Small Firm Section

Chair

2012 - 2014

UC Hastings College of the Law

Board of Governors

2011 - 2012

Bar Association of San Francisco, Barristers Club

Past President

2009 - 2011

Bar Association of San Francisco

Chair, Mock Trial Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

Drummond v. Francesca Association

Settlement

Creekside Partners v. Wentz Group

Settlement

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

UC Hastings COL

law

N/A

Cornell Univ

undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2014

UC Hastings Alumni Office

Going (and Thriving) Solo

2014

Bar Association of San Francisco

Hiring your first employee

Publications

2007

Association of Business Trial Lawyers Report The Revised Uniform Partnership Act: An Introduction

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution