Michael David Sargent

Michael David Sargent

5.0
Rating: 8.0

Licensed for 23 years

Litigation Lawyer at Riverside, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Personal Injury, Construction & Development

3610 Fourteenth Street, Riverside, CA

About Michael

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 23 years

State: California

Acquired: 2002

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Michael David Sargent

3610 Fourteenth Street, Riverside, CA, 92501

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael David Sargent's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 2
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | General Knowledge

Posted by Steve | December 29, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Business

Vice President Operations

Michael Sargent has represented our company for many years. He is very knowledgeable regarding the type of lawsuits he has represented for our company. Always has great advice, timely follow through and has been successful in getting our cases settled as quickly as possible.

See All Client Reviews

Michael David Sargent's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael
J. E. Holmes III headshot
J. Holmes

Litigation lawyer | Jul 07

Relationship: Co-worker

"Michael Sargent is a truly outstanding trial lawyer who has litigated numerous complex litigation matters in a exemplary manner. He is extremely effective in successfully representing his clients in their diverse litigation matters. He is aggressive in a civilized manner, trustworthy and is noted for his follow through with his clients. His legal abilities are of the highest level and his ethical standards are beyond reproach. I highly recommend Mr. Sargent."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Personal injury lawyer | May 30

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Michael. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Darren O'Leary Aitken headshot
Darren Aitken

Unknown lawyer | Jul 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Michael is a great advocate for his client. I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
J. E. Holmes III headshot
J. Holmes

Litigation lawyer

Darren O'Leary Aitken headshot
Darren Aitken

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.0 (Excellent)

Honors

2016

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

Southern California Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2010

Southern California Rising Star, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2003 - Present

Partner, Graves & King LLP

Associations

2014 - Present

Claims & Litigation Management Alliance

Member

2009 - Present

California Professional Association of Specialty Contractors

Member

2006 - Present

Association of Southern California Defense Counsel

Member

2000 - Present

Orange County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Prudent Energy Services v. Protectoplas Company; Case No. CV 12-9480 FMO (SHx)

Hung jury which later resulted in a favorable settlement for our client.

Lawerence Pasternack v. Vision West Investments, LLC; Case No. INC065760

Defense verdict on behalf of our client, Maco Equipment Rentals, Inc.

Michael T. Gutierrez et al. v. County of San Bernardino (2011) 198 Cal. App. 4th 831

The defense verdict was upheld by the Court of Appeal of the State of California - Fourth Appellate District Division Two as to our client, the County of San Bernardino. The California Supreme Court affirmed the verdict in favor of San Bernardino County.

Michael Gutierrez et. al v. County of San Bernardino; Case No. SCVSS131917

Defense verdict on behalf of our client, the County of San Bernardino.

Steven Nanko v. ETCO Development: Case No. 04CC02683

Net zero defense verdict in favor of our client, Preferred Framing, Inc.

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

University of La Verne College of Law

law

N/A

San Diego State Univ

undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2012

West Coast Casualty - Construction Defect Seminar

"Housing Boom & Bust - Is it the End of Construction Defect Litigation as We Know It?"

2009

West Coast Casualty - Construction Defect Seminar

Gaps in Insurance Coverage

2009

Avoiding the Claims Management Trap

Construction Defect Claim Handling, SB800 Claims & SIR Management

2008

West Coast Casualty - Construction Defect Seminar

Emerging Home Building Tecnologies

2007

West Coast Casualty - Construction Defect Seminar

The Power of Settlement Offsets

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution