Riverside, CA
Litigation Lawyer at Riverside, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Personal Injury, Construction & Development
OUTCOME: Hung jury which later resulted in a favorable settlement for our client.
This was a Federal Central District of California jury trial. The claims alleged were breach of contract and warranty concerning six large 12,500 gallon plastic tanks that were alleged to have allowed ... acid to escape from them due to deficient work of our client.
OUTCOME: Defense verdict on behalf of our client, Maco Equipment Rentals, Inc.
This was a Riverside County Superior Court jury trial involving alleged real estate fraud, breach of contract and construction defects involving a single custom built home in the prestigious Bighorn De ... velopment in Palm Desert, California. We attained a defense verdict for the client.
OUTCOME: The defense verdict was upheld by the Court of Appeal of the State of California - Fourth Appellate District Division Two as to our client, the County of San Bernardino. The California Supreme Court affirmed the verdict in favor of San Bernardino County.
Claimed inverse condemnation, dangerous condition of public property, negligence and nuisance by homeowners in Devore, California following a brush fire / flash flood sequence. The plaintiffs' were se ... eking approximately $5,000,000.00 in damages. A roadway in the County of San Bernardino was alleged to have been a de facto flood control channel following a brush fire and later flash flood. Six homes adjacent to the roadway were moderately-to-severely damaged in the flash flood.
OUTCOME: Defense verdict on behalf of our client, the County of San Bernardino.
San Bernardino County Superior Court trial where the plaintiffs claimed inverse condemnation, dangerous condition of public property, negligence and nuisance. The homeowners in Devore, California, fol ... lowing a brush fire / flash flood sequence, were seeking approximately $5,000,000.00 in damages. A roadway in the County of San Bernardino was alleged to have been a de facto flood control channel following a brush fire and later flash flood. Six homes adjacent to the roadway were moderately-to-severely damaged in the flash flood.
OUTCOME: Net zero defense verdict in favor of our client, Preferred Framing, Inc.
Orange County Superior Court jury trial in which plaintiff, Steven Nanko, alleged various construction defects against the developer and trade contractors that constructed his house. We were among thr ... ee trade contractors that went to trial with the plaintiff. The plaintiff was seeking in excess of $300,000.00 from our client. Following a lengthy trial, the plaintiff was not awarded any compensation for any alleged damages to his property.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
