|Award name||Grantor||Date granted|
|Recognized for significant appeallate work||California Employment Lawyers Association||2016|
|Finalist - San Diego's Best Lawyer||San Diego Union Tribune||2015|
|Best Lawyers in San Diego - nominee||Legal Force Media||2008|
|Convention honoree for case success||California Employment Lawyers Association||2008|
|Convention Honoree for Sucess during year||Califorrnia Employment Lawyers Association||2007|
|Association name||Position name||Duration|
|Consumer Attorneys of San Diego||N/A||2009 - Present|
|National Employment Lawyers Association||N/A||2000 - Present|
|California Employment Lawyers Association||Committee on Public Employment||2000 - Present|
|State Bar of California||N/A||1974 - Present|
|Avilez v Omnicare||$1,00,000+ settlement for after fees and costs awards of over $3,000 to long term employees|
|Olvera v Jack in the Box||$1,000,000.00 Settlement|
|Barcenas v Herb Tyme||$1,000,000+ Settlement|
|See all legal cases|
|Univ of San Diego SOL||N/A||law||1974|
Posted by PAUL
I WAS a client of Paul Jackson.
He did NOT defend me ZEALOUSLY.
When I told him the consulting doctor he sent me to was rude to me and DID NOT perform the necessary tests, he ignored me.
A GOOD lawyer is supposed to take care of you ZEALOUSLY.
He just bailed out and dropped me.
I had to go around and scrounge for another lawyer.
NOTE: He could've consulted with another doctor and asked: "Did he perform the necessary tests?"
Endorsements from fellow lawyers are an important consideration for many when selecting the right attorney. Be the first to endorse your colleague!