Janice Ryan Mazur

PRO

Janice Ryan Mazur

4.7
Rating: 7.3

Licensed for 36 years

Appeals Lawyer at El Cajon, CA
Practice Areas: Appeals, Lawsuits & Disputes

13465 Camino Canada, 106-103, El Cajon, CA

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Janice

Biography

Over 30 Years Experience - Personalized Attention & Dedicated Representation.

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Appeals 90%

Appeals and writs to the California and Ninth Circuit courts of appeal.

35 years

90%
Lawsuits and Disputes 10%

Research and drafting of motions.

35 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Licenses

Licensed in California for 36 years

State: California

Acquired: 1989

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Mazur & Mazur, LLC

13465 Camino Canada, 106-103, El Cajon, CA, 92021

appealslawyercalifornia.com/

Janice Ryan Mazur's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

24 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (24) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 11 - 15 of 15 reviews | Case Results

Posted by Larry | December 13, 2010

GOOD RESULTS FOR A GOOD PRICE

Janice Mazur successfully appealed a judgment against us in regards to a trust matter at a very reasonable price. She was a great help throughout the whole process. We subsequently hired her for another matter which also ended very satisfactory for us. If we ever ran into another problem I would not ...hesitate to hire her again.

Posted by Naomi | December 13, 2010

The most helpful attorney I've ever met

I would absolutely recommend this attorney to anyone. Mrs. Mazur was an appointed attorney for my husband who is fighting for his life and she won his appeal, but the board continues to ignore the court order, instead of Mrs. Mazur saying I did my job and moving on, she continues to stay in constant ...contact with me, sending relevent information that will help his case, make any phone calls to anyone that might be able to able help. If it wasn't for her, I wouldn't know where to go, she truly cares about her clients and their wellbeing and it is so rare that you find an attorney that doesn't brush you off when you ask questions. If you ever want a dedicated, trustworthy and understanding attorney, she would be the best decision you had ever made.

Posted by Albert | December 13, 2010

Review of Janice Mazur appeals attorney

My name is Albert Balascio. Janice Mazur represented my wife and I in an appeal after an insurance company received a $94,000 judgement from a wrongful death suite involving our daughter Stacey's death in case we lost on the first go around. You see our daughter was killed by an illegally parked ...semi truck that broke several other laws that include both frederal and state regulation. Janice Mazur handled our case on appeal with the utmost care, knowledge and professionalism. She won our case even though everyone said that we had 1 chance in 10 of winning. That completely wiped out the $94,000 dollar Judgement the Insurance company had against us. Janice Mazur's fees were so reasonable that I don't remember what she charged us. Certainly much less than most other attorneys that charge us a lot more. I had no problems with her biling. I can't say enough good things about Janice Mazur. She is the best attorney I have had the pleasure of knowing and the most reasonable in her biling I have found. I can't say that for any other attorney I have ever hired and I have hired quite a few so I wouldn't have a problem recommending Janice Mazur to anyone.

Posted by Thomas | December 13, 2010

We are using Janice Mazur for the 2nd time now

While we were unable to prevail, we found Janice to be a very good appeals attorney. Her fees are reasonable, and in our last case she sent us a refund of the unused portion of fees without a request. We are currently using her again in another appeals matter that is pending at this time.

Posted by anonymous | September 10, 2024 | Hired Attorney

I do not recommend

There was important evidence missing from her documents that could have jeopardized my case. Fortunately the appeal judges did not miss anything and they affirmed. Working from a different state is not always helpful.

Janice Mazur

Replied last September 12, 2024

Although this client had never been involved in an appeal before, he demanded that I present his case in a way that was not helpful to his position, despite many communications in which I explained to him how the appellate process works and how the appellate judges would review his case. I presented all the necessary evidence to the court and ultimately, the court decided in my client’s favor on exactly the grounds and for the reasons I predicted it would. Despite the fact that I won his case, the client accused me of “conspiring” against him with his opponent, a contention which was not only false, it was completely illogical. After I won the case, the matter was sent back to the trial court where my client was potentially entitled to recover attorneys’ fees from his losing opponent. Because he had been abusive to me, I declined to represent him in these subsequent proceedings which were not within the scope of our Retainer Agreement. However, consistent with my ethical responsibilities, I did provide him with detailed information about what he had to submit and what his deadlines were. He hired another lawyer who blew the deadline to file the necessary papers. After that, despite having accused me of being unethical and dishonest, he begged me to represent him again against the new lawyer. I declined, and as a result, he has provided this negative review. Working out of state has no bearing on appellate practice, which involves electronic filings of documents and no evidentiary hearings.

See All Client Reviews

Janice Ryan Mazur's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Janice
Scott E. Shaffman headshot
Scott Shaffman

Appeals lawyer | Nov 18

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Janice has written five appeals for me over a 25 year period and we won all five. Great writer, very bright."

Michelle J. Cameron-Hunsaker headshot
Michelle Cameron-Hunsaker

Appeals lawyer | Jan 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"My Mazur is a very dedicated and competent attorney. She has been the appeals attorney for matters I have worked on and she has done an outstanding job. I recommend her highly."

Ronald Sheldon Marks headshot
Ronald Marks

Appeals lawyer | Dec 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Janice has handled appeals for me on several occasions has always done an excellent job."

View All Endorsements
Scott E. Shaffman headshot
Scott Shaffman

Insurance lawyer

Virgil Adam Iler headshot
Virgil Iler

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.3 (Very Good)

Honors

1989

Salutatorian, Western State University

1989

American Jurisprudence Awards (7 times), Western State University

1985

President's Scholarship, Western State University

Work Experience

1991 - Present

Attorney, Mazur & Mazur, Attorneys at Law

Education

1989

Western State University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution