Find a Lawyer California Santa Fe Springs Workers Compensation
Paul Raymond Dixon

PRO

Paul Raymond Dixon

also known as Paul R. Dixon

3.8
3 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 6.9

Licensed for 47 years

Workers compensation Lawyer at Santa Fe Springs, CA
Practice Areas: Workers Compensation, Personal Injury, Construction & Development, Defective and Dangerous Products

Suite 210, 10330 Pioneer Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA

Call for a consultation (562) 478-7756

Send Message
Paul Raymond Dixon's Website
Overview Reviews Experience
Overview Reviews Experience
Call for a consultation (562) 478-7756

About Paul

Biography

Paul r. Dixon was born in Los Angeles and has been a Southern California resident his entire life. He attended Whittier College for undergraduate studies, majoring in Political Science and History. He ...

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Construction and Development 25%

25%
Defective and Dangerous Products 25%

25%
Personal Injury 25%

25%
Workers Compensation 25%

25%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Contact for Details

Awards

Distinguished Peer Review Rating

Distinguished Peer Review Rating

Distinguished Peer Review Rating

An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience.

This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Licenses

Licensed in California for 47 years

State: California

Acquired: 1978

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Dixon & Daley, LLP

(562) 946-3779

Fax

Suite 210, 10330 Pioneer Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA, 90670

dixondaleylaw.com/Attorneys/Paul-R-Dixon.shtml
Message Get Directions

Paul Raymond Dixon's Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 1
1 star 0
Practice Areas
Workers Compensation (2)
What Clients Mention
Practice Area Knowledge (1) Professionalism (1) Responsiveness (1)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Posted by Sally | March 12, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Workers Compensation

“Thank you Kaitlyn”

After having difficulty finding an attorney. I contacted Dixon & Daley and spoke with Kaitlin. After explaining my situation, without hesitation she agreed to help me. I am truly at a loss of words to express my gratitude and thankfulness for everything that Kaitlin did for me. As an attorney s...he was very knowledgeable in my Workmen’s Comp. situation. She helped me through every step of the way. It was really an effort less situation for me, because Kaitlin took care of everything for me. I simply needed to just focus on the injuries that I suffered and getting well. She was always there for every question that I had, she always responded to me in a very timely manner. She showed compassion towards me and of course professionalism.. I truly cannot thank Kaitlin enough for all that she did for me during this time. I would recommend Kaitlin 100% to anyone that needs a Workmen’s Comp. attorney. You will not be disappointed. I would also like to think her assistant Josie. Josie was such a wonderful help as well. Every time I spoke with her she was kind, compassionate, and very helpful. “I want to say thank you Josie as well for all your help and kindness.”

Posted by Andrew | April 04, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Workers Compensation

Not Recommended: This is a volume office, you'll be just a number.

I am definitely unsatisfied with the service I received as Paul Dixon's client in a workers' compensation case. Ultimately I became so unhappy with the level of service I was receiving that I elected to change attorneys, and had a dramatically better experience with another office. Some details ar...e below for those who want to read further. Bottom line: it was clear to me this is a volume office, and your case may well be left at the "bottom of the stack." I suggest you look elsewhere. Some Specifics: (1) There was a lack of follow-up in communication with other parties involved. This was a constant, and my case was repeatedly allowed to sit waiting longer than was necessary, sometimes by weeks on end. In these instances, it was only when I started calling myself to check status and request action that the process was moved forward. (2) Poor customer service. Several issues here: (a) When attempting to get advice over the phone, it was at times difficult to get contact directly with the attorney. Further, when I did have a conversation, it was rushed and the attorney was clearly trying to spend as little time as possible with me before moving on to his next issue. To be fair, this did not occur every time, but was a repeat issue. (b) I was not notified in advance that a different attorney at the office would be handling my deposition. I can understand the decision to have another attorney at the office handle that part of the process, however to walk into a situation like that unaware was unacceptable to me. This introduced questions in my mind immediately before a deposition about whether this other attorney was briefed on my case, who I was actually represented by, etc. Although the other attorney did the job well enough, being caught off guard with that scenario introduced more stress into an already unpleasant situation. This could have been avoided with a simple email notification in advance - something I'd expect in even basic business communications, let alone in a legal matter. (c) Inappropriate attitude on the part of some staff. The paralegal handling my case had a customer service attitude I'll describe gently as REALLY short of the mark for a professional office. As time wore on and it was necessary to follow up with this office repeatedly, her attitude worsened, eventually becoming outright rude. (3) A filing mistake made by this office immediately before I changed representation opened the door for opposition to string the case out even longer, which they of course did. This added another couple of months to an already drawn-out case. In other instances when I've had legal representation (including the office I changed to after leaving Dixon & Daley), that representation was professional & courteous, stayed on top of every deadline and process point, and made sure I was fully informed every step of the way. This was absolutely NOT the case with Dixon & Daley, and for my part I suggest you look elsewhere. -- Best of luck

See All Client Reviews

Paul Raymond Dixon's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Paul

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.9 (Good)

Honors

N/A

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1900 - Present

Partner, Dixon & Daley, LLP

Education

1978

California Western School of Law

JD

1975

Whittier College

BA

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution
Learn More About the Avvo Rating