Kenneth G. Eade

PRO

Kenneth G. Eade

5.0
Rating: 6.7

Licensed for 45 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Beverly Hills, CA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Internet, Arbitration

9350 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 203, Beverly Hills, CA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2001
See Details

Free Consultation

About Kenneth

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property 50%

AMZ Sellers Attorney® protects e-commerce brands through trademark, copyright, and patent registration, enforcement, and litigation. The firm handles Brand Registry strategy, infringement and counterfeit removal, hijacker disputes, TTAB proceedings,

28 years | 700 cases

50%
Arbitration 25%

AMZ Sellers Attorney® represents businesses in arbitration and complex digital commerce disputes across Amazon, Walmart, eBay, PayPal, and other platforms. The firm handles frozen funds, contract and marketplace disputes, and prosecutes and defends E

700 cases

25%
Internet 25%

AMZ Sellers Attorney® advises sellers, brands, and startups across the full e-commerce lifecycle, from business and marketplace setup to global operations and disputes. The firm handles compliance structuring, account creation, Brand Registry.

13 years | 1,995 cases

25%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 500-500 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Credit Card

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2020 2019 2018
...
+ 1

Licenses

Licensed in California for 45 years

State: California

Acquired: 1980

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2001

Location

AMZ Sellers Attorney

9350 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 203, Beverly Hills, CA, 90212

amazonsellers.attorney/about-us.html

Online Presence

Other places you can find Kenneth online.

Kenneth G. Eade's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

86 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (86) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 85
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1

Showing 1 - 5 of 86 reviews

Posted by Kevin | April 08, 2022 | Hired Attorney

Twitter Reinstatement

Fast legal help. Excellent Staff. Affordable. From the on-set, courteous and available throughout the entire time.

Posted by anonymous | May 07, 2020 | Hired Attorney

Great communication and Quick turnaround

Reinstated our account in a quick manner. Has a lot of experience in the field and knew exactly what to do.

Posted by anonymous | May 02, 2020 | Hired Attorney

Good advice and timely responses

Being a first time seller on Amazon, I mistakenly unprofitably sold a patented product. I was in the process of having Amazon destroy the remaining inventory when I received word from Amazon, they were removing the listing. I wasn't really concerned because I was already in the process not selling th...e product but Amazon held the payments of the sales of my second product I was in the process of selling. Initially, I thought Amazon was holding payments because I never had a good selling product and they needed to know it wouldn't be returned in large quantities. After 30 days, my payments were still on hold. I finally spoke with a competent seller central rep and they told me the payments will NOT be released until a settlement is made with the patent holder. TOTALLY UNFAIR and I can go on for days about Amazon's power to freeze unrelated payments but there's too much to say about that topic. The fortunate thing I can say is Amazon didn't deactivate my account, they only froze all payments. Also, I tried to message Amazon about their right to hold payments unrelated to the patented product and never received a response. Another call to seller central support revealed that basically Amazon will only reverse their restriction when the patent holder sends them confirmation of a settlement. I googled attorneys for Amazon sellers. I actually found Mr. Eade when reading a review about another attorney's services and in one of the bad reviews, the person mentioned they had to get a second attorney (Mr. Eade) so that's how I learned about his services. Before I paid for his services, I asked alot of questions which he answered before I made a payment to him. I wanted to know how cases like mine pan out and his answers never guaranteed a result. His answers stated possible results and also what action could be taken if the desired result wasn't achieved. I appreciated the honesty in his replies. Also, he responded quickly to all my questions. Result - (As per the agreement I signed to resolve the issues, I cannot reveal exact details of the settlement) but when I emailed the patent holder's attorney before obtaining Mr. Eade's services, they only reduced their settlement offer by a half. With Mr Eade's help, the final settlement was a quarter of the original settlement amount. The one thing I would like to reveal to allow anyone reading this review, I did NOT sell many of the patented product. The argument to the patent holder was I sold 120 sets and if those sales produced $10 profit (which they didn't for me - all sales were unprofitable due to high PPC spend), those sales in theory took $1200 from the patent holder's pocket. If you add court fees to that amount, I don't believe the settlement amount should be more than $2000. The result was more which I wasn't pleased about and I don't know how courts would rule on cases like these and I don't blame the patent holder because if I had a patent and someone sold my product, I would hope to have recourse but I do NOT agree that Amazon should have the right to hold profits from another product and hold your account "hostage" until you settle with the patent holder. I agree that Amazon should have the right to remove a listing and not allow you to continue sales and I agree if your account gets multiple strikes for selling patented products, your account should be suspended but to hold your payments "hostage" is NOT ethical. I mistakenly sold a patented product. It was my first attempt to sell a product on Amazon and it was a valuable and costly mistake. One last point about Amazon - when a patent holder presents a patent to Amazon, they should have the ability to immediately shut listings down. This product is still being sold by knowing and unknowing sellers. Amazon could stop this but they don't. They allow the sellers to sell the product then wait for the patent holder to get a temporary restraining order against the sellers and then hold all their payments which includes any proceeds

Posted by Michael | April 17, 2020 | Hired Attorney

Highly recommended.Excellent firm and very supportive

Thank you so much for all you guys did.I thought it was a hopeless case since the first company that helped me was not able to succeed but what you guys did was magic!Kudos to Sir Keith and you,Leito for such an excellent firm.You guys were always responsive and timely.And what I like about it is... that the one time fee includes unlimited revisions and letters to Amazon unlike other firm that will charge you with every single revisions. I would not hesitate recommending your firm to anyone selling in Amazon.You guys are an awesome team!!!

Posted by Banu | April 11, 2020 | Hired Attorney

Patent issue resolved!

Ken is experienced and very easy to work with. I highly recommend this lawyer if you want your Amazon IP issues resolved in a timely manner. Ken's assistant was also super helpful in getting the last details sorted.

See All Client Reviews

Kenneth G. Eade's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kenneth

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.7 (Good)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2001.

Discipline, Probation; no Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2001

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney had a suspension placed on hold (and ultimately removed) by complying with certain requirements.

Discipline, Probation; no Actual Suspension issued in CA, 1995

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney had a suspension placed on hold (and ultimately removed) by complying with certain requirements.

Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 1992

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Honors

2018

Client's Choice, Avvo

Associations

2017 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

Education

1980

Southwestern University School of Law

JD

N/A

California State University, Northridge

Publications

Languages

English

French

Russian

Spanish

Turkish

Arabic

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2001
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution