Charles J. Harder

Charles J. Harder

1.0
Rating: 7.4

Licensed for 29 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Beverly Hills, CA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Business, Entertainment ... +2 more

132 S. Rodeo Drive, Suite 301, Beverly Hills, CA

About Charles

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 11 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2014

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 12 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2014

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 29 years

State: California

Acquired: 1996

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Harder Mirell & Abrams LLP

132 S. Rodeo Drive, Suite 301, Beverly Hills, CA, 90212

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Charles J. Harder's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Kelly | April 07, 2024

Does not return calls or emails

Claims to be taking new clients yet this attorney fails to return calls or emails.

See All Client Reviews

Charles J. Harder's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Charles

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.4 (Very Good)

Education

1996

Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University

JD - Juris Doctor

1996

University of California - Santa Cruz

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

Loyola Law School

Board Member: Entertainment & Digital Media Symposium

2015

CLE Presentation Hanson Jacobson law firm

Publicity and Privacy Law in 2015

2014

CLE Presentation Ziffren Brittenham law firm

Privacy Protection: A Master Class

2013

American Bar Association, International Law Section

What are the Limitations in a Modern Democratic Society on the Freedom of Expression?

2012

State Bar of California

IP and the Internet

2012

Los Angeles County Bar Association, Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Section

Co-Chair: Entertainment Law and Litigation Symposium

2011

CLE Presentation Jackoway Tyerman law firm

Identifying and Terminating Online Infringers, Imposters & Defamers

Publications

2005

Santa Clara Law Review Schwarzenegger vs. Bobbleheads: The Case for Schwarzenegger

1995

Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Is It Curtains for Joe Camel?…

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution