Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
PRO
Jeffrey Fredrich Sklan
Free Consultation
About Jeffrey
Practice Areas
3
Practice Areas
Criminal Defense
50%
47 years | 5,000 cases
Divorce and Separation
40%
47 years | 1,000 cases
Domestic Violence
10%
47 years | 500 cases
Fees and Rates
Cost
Payment Methods
- Cash
- Check
- Credit Card
Awards
2025 2024 2023
...
+
10
Licenses
Licensed in California for 46 years
State: California
Acquired: 1979
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 1998
Location
Law Offices of Jeffrey Sklan
8484 Wilshire Blvd Suite 660, Beverly Hills, CA, 90211
jeffreysklan.com/Jeffrey Fredrich Sklan's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
187 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (187)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Lawsuits & Disputes (47)
Criminal Defense (37)
Family (31)
Child Custody (19)
Divorce & Separation (14)
Domestic Violence (10)
DUI & DWI (6)
Child Support (5)
Landlord & Tenant (5)
Business (4)
Litigation (4)
Real Estate (4)
Bankruptcy & Debt (3)
Immigration (3)
Speeding & Traffic Ticket (3)
Contracts & Agreements (2)
Debt Collection (2)
Debt Settlement (2)
Adoption (1)
Animal Law (1)
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy (1)
Consumer Protection (1)
Expungement (1)
Identity Theft (1)
Insurance (1)
LGBT+ Law (1)
Limited Liability Company (LLC) (1)
Violent Crime (1)
What Clients Mention
Case Results (89)
Advocacy (76)
Recommendation (73)
Responsiveness (60)
Professionalism (58)
Communication Style (43)
Practice Area Knowledge (40)
Character & Conduct (34)
Compassion (33)
General Knowledge (30)
Trustworthiness (26)
Cost of Services (21)
Staff & Support (15)
Punctuality (5)
Free Consultations (2)
Payment Plans (1)
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Consumer Protection
Posted by ClaudiaAlvarado | August 15, 2013 | Consumer Protection
Wonderful experience ❤ from the attorney to the paralegals Jeffrey Sklan is awesome.
My experience with Jeffrey Sklan has been up to this day GREAT!!! He is very profesional, respectful And his paralegals are awesome. I was having the worse time of my life with a fraudulent realtor and a very unprofessional unethical admint who was the assistant to another attorney. I felt all my har...
Jeffrey Fredrich Sklan's Lawyer Endorsements
"I have known Jeffrey for over four years, and have worked with him both as opposing counsel and collaboratively. Jeffrey is a creative, smart, and effective lawyer who knows how to get results. A strong advocate for his clients, and a generous resource and wealth of knowledge for his colleagues, I would highly recommend Jeffrey for anyone seeking an experienced, personable, and well-respected lawyer in California."
"A true lifesaver. I couldn't be more thankful. I wholeheartedly endorse this attorney."
"I endorse this lawyer. Jeff is a great lawyer. He is very thorough and fights for his clients. In the matter that he and I worked on, we obtained great results for our client"
"I endorse Jeffrey for his amazing capacity to get the best possible results while remaining calm under pressure. Jeffrey fuses common sense with impressive knowledge of law and procedure that has earned him great respect among his clients and colleagues."
Experience
Professional misconduct
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 1998.
Private reproval, public disclosure issued in CA, 1998
updated on 02/06/2010Private reproval, public disclosure means the attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar warns the lawyer in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.
Public reproval with/duties issued in CA, 1997
updated on 06/17/2015A censure or reprimand issued by the Supreme Court or the State Bar Court that is not a matter of public record unless imposed after the initiation of formal disciplinary proceedings. No period of suspension is imposed. The reproval may be imposed with duties or conditions.
Jeffrey’s comment:
“The State Bar release stated that, during the course of a civil case wherein I WAS THE CLIENT, suing another lawyer on a breach of contract claim, a $250 discovery sanction had not been paid. In fact, it had but the recipient (an office employee of the opposing side) kept the cash, and did not turn it over to his employer. FURTHER: there were NO CLIENT money or liberties involved, the public was not affected, and the case amicably settled. The employee died of a heart attack soon thereafter.”
Honors
2025
Client's Choice, Avvo
2024
Client's Choice, Avvo
2023
Client's Choice, Avvo
2022
Client's Choice, Avvo
2021
Client's Choice, Avvo
2020
Client's Choice, Avvo
Work Experience
1979 - Present
Founder and Trial Attorney, Law Offices of Jeffrey Sklan
Sample of Legal Cases
People V Villanueva
NOT GUILTY
People v Selmanovic
NOT GUILTY verdict after trial
People V Rangel
Case dismissed during TRIAL.
People v Graves
NOT GUILTY at jury trial
Education
1979
Santa Clara University School of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
1977
Santa Clara University Business School
Masters Business Administration
1975
Univ of California at Los Angeles
Bachelor of Arts
Speaking Engagements
2016
Photo LA
Photographer's Rights
2013
Lecture to Families
Services for incarcerated family members
Languages
Korean
English
Spanish
Activity
Legal Answers
Legal Answers
Q&A
I am paying a mortgage in California. Both names are on the title. Will my wife get the house while there is no will ?
26 Jan 2020
Q&A
Is it required to complete a domestic violence course/BIP for a family law restraining order?
07 Sep 2018
Q&A
Can the landlord forbids me to use electricity in my assigned garage?
08 Sep 2018