We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
also known as Lee
As a criminal defense lawyer, Lee has dedicated her skills to protecting the constitutional rights and liberties of her clients. Before re-locating to New Mexico in 2001, Lee practiced in South Dakota. While serving on various committees and boards, Lee has been a tireless advocate for the rights of accused and convicted persons. Her service on the South Dakota Elections Board resulted in significant changes in South Dakota law concerning the voting rights of convicted felons. As the Chair of the South Dakota Criminal Law Committee she recommended many needed changes in the law and procedure in South Dakota.
Lee’s special legal interests include medical, DNA and psychological evidence.
Lee is a wife, mom, step-mom and grandma and step-grandma. She has a dog and 2 cats. Her hobbies include downhill skiing, politics, reading and cooking.
1
Practice Area
36 years | 3,000 cases
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: New Mexico
Acquired: 2005
No misconduct found
State: South Dakota
Acquired: 1990
No misconduct found
State: Texas
Acquired: 2005
No misconduct found
505 Marquette Ave NW, Albuquerque, NM, 87102
3 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Posted by Jim | April 04, 2012
Great Lawyer!!
Great Lawyer, very patient and great listener, Lelia's expertise in law helped me and my family threw a very tough time. I will always recommend her to anyone going threw a legal issue. Thank you Lelia for your professional and courteous help!!
Posted by Gigi | December 18, 2011 | Criminal Defense
Great Lawyer
Ms. Hood is a very caring, determined, hark working attorney. She wants justice for her clients and works hard to get them justice. She kept in touch, was very knowledgeable, and trustworthy. Ms. Hood was able to get an innocent man acquitted and home.
Posted by anonymous | April 06, 2011 | Family
Top notch
Ms. Hood helped my son with a family matter. She was very patient, knowledgeable, and professional.
"I endorse this lawyer. She is a brilliant mind and the premier legal research and appellate attorney in the state!"
"Lelia is a tireless advocate for her clients. She leaves no stone unturned. I have had the opportunity to witness first-hand the zeal and dedication with which she approaches every case. Her knowledge, experience, and professionalism set her apart from others in her field."
"I endorse this lawyer. She worked hard to get her innocent client off of death row and back home. Need I say more?"
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
2014
Board Member, New Mexico Justice
2012
Regional Director, New Mexico Criminal Defense Lawyers Association
2010
Committee Member, DNA Identification Oversight Committe
2007
Criminal Uniform Jury Instructions Committee, New Mexico Supreme Court
2004 - Present
Lawyer, New Mexico Public Defender, Capital Crimes
1997 - 2002
Owner, Hood Law Office
1993 - 1996
Managing Partner, Wurm & Hood, Prof.L.L.C.
1991 - 1992
Lawyer, Pennington County Public Defender
1990 - 1991
Managing Attorney, Dakota Plains Legal Services
2010 - Present
New Mexico DNA Identification Oversight CommitteeBoard Member
2007 - Present
UJI Committee, New Mexico Supreme CourtMember
2005 - Present
New Mexico Criminal Defense Lawyers AssociationMember
2005 - Present
National Legal Aid and Defender AssociationMember
1992 - Present
American Bar AssociationMember
1991 - Present
National Association of Criminal Defense AttorneysMember
2000 - 2002
State of South Dakota Board of ElectionsBoard Member
1998 - 2001
South Dakota State Bar Criminal Law CommiteeChairperson
Pathologist could base her expert testimony on inadmissible evidence within limits.
Client was found not guilty.
The judge denied the state's request to instruct the jury under the old law.
The trial court ruled that the DNA evidence was not scientifically acceptable for use at trial.
The death penalty was not allowed.
Client got a new sentencing hearing.
The client got a new trial.
The South Dakota Supreme Court found that the trial court's rulings operated to deprive Blackwell of a protected property interest in his dog.
The Court granted Defendant’s Motion to reduce sentence pursuant to USSG § 5K2.12, Coercion and Duress.
Not guilty by reason of insanity.
Not guilty and dismissed.
The Court of Appeals reversed the District Court.
The Federal District Court refused to revoke the client's bond.
Remanded for re-determination of alimony and attorney fees.
The Court concluded that it did have jurisdiction
South Dakota Supreme Court granted the Writ of Prohibition.
1989
JD - Juris Doctor
1987
Bachelor of Science, cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa
2013
Overcoming Child Abuse Allegations
2013
2012
Expect Resistance:The Mental Health Defenses of Insanity and Negation of Specific Intent
2012
2011
Client Comptency
2011
2010
Drafting Jury Instructions With an Eye Toward Appeal,”
2010
How to Unpack a DNA Case
2010
Evidence for Trial Lawyers
2008
Mitigation and Jury Selection in Capital Cases
2014
2011
2007
Legal Answers