Elizabeth S. Langford

Elizabeth S. Langford

also known as Liz Langford

4.3
Rating: 8.3

Licensed for 35 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Peoria, AZ
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Family, Alimony ... +2 more

9059 W. Lake Pleasant Parkway, 300, Peoria, AZ

About Elizabeth

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Family 20%

31 years

20%
Alimony 10%

31 years

10%
Child Custody 10%

31 years

10%
Child Support 10%

31 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 35 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 1990

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Office of Katherine Kraus, PLLC

9059 W. Lake Pleasant Parkway, 300, Peoria, AZ, 85382

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Elizabeth S. Langford's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.3 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Communication Style

Posted by Lou | November 08, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Child Support

Overrated

To whom it may concern, If you are looking to hire a lawyer, I'd watch out before hiring Elizabeth langford. I hired her for over 10 years, as we though that starting over with another lawyer would be way more costly to which i know now was a big mistake. Elizabeth was our lawyer for at least 3 prev...ious cases, she charged $20k+ for at least 2 of them and although we won the cases, it was not due to her due diligence, but my long hours working through documents to bullet point evey actions. We found that she does follow the law for the most part, but she will not build a case for you or really defend her client in court. When we had meets with her, she turns them into a gosip hour and provided no actual plan to defend her client. Her last case as my lawyer, she charged at least $27,000 a case, and I had to build the case for her walking through every little detail (often multiple times). She failed to either remember what was told to her or she just didnt really care to remember, not sure. She then will feel entitled to bill hours on reviewing case information that she doesnt actually know and showed up to court dazed and confused. She waited until the day of court to ask, should we present first or second? I said, they filed the cases first, we are the defendant, they were the plantiff, they should go first. She agreed, but then mins later, in court, when the judge asked who should go first, she said ok, we will go first. No fight, no objection. This put us in a bad position as it's always better to go last since you hear everything the other person is claiming and can defend your client better, but no. She completely forgot to tell the judge about the unpaid medical / covid claims and when asked for documents to support medical premiums were paid, she froze like a deer in headlight. Her representation in court was pathetic and the other lawyer was far more prepared. Making Elizabeth look like a complete fool scrambling around, not to mention her client (my wife) who she provided no support. She was discombobulated shifting through papers frantically, leaving my wife to try and figure out what to do. When my wife was on the stand, she didnt asking any relevant follow up questions that could defend my wife. They were trying to charge for an extra curricular sport expenses to which our previous court document stated all extra sports must be agreed to in writing. We had extra sports that the plantiff agreed to but never paid, and yet she couldn't remember to say that in court. I made sure in previous cases to outline this keep each side from just trying to force the other parent to pay costs they may not be able to afford. Well, Elizabeth must have been sleeping bc she was dead silent. No defense just let them walk all over my wife. She completely forgot to tell the judge about the unpaid medical / covid claims and when asked for documents to support medical preimuims were paid, she froze like a deer in headlight, then was discombobulated/bewildered shifting through papers frantically. My poor wife was left defenseless, up the creek without a paddle, yet Elizabeth just sat there mostly silent. In this case, I can say I did stand back and watched after i know she had all the docs to defend my wife as I wanted to see if she would fail so i had the proof I needed to fire her. I was 100% correct. She provided no real fight in court and this justified me firing her. Ive debated if i should write a review and i said i want to make sure others are warned about her bc her profile doesnt lead you to see, in my opinion, the truth of how she presents herself in court. Overall, my opinion of Elizabeth Langford is she is disorganized and really not a true fighter for her clients. Although our cases ended fine for us bc the ex was behind in child support, etc. her representation of a client is to say less-than-stellar.

See All Client Reviews

Elizabeth S. Langford's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Elizabeth
Thomas A Morton headshot
Thomas Morton

Family lawyer | Jan 15

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. I have had cases against Liz for nearly a decade. She is very knowledgeable and is a strong advocate for her clients."

Rebecca Marie Marquis headshot
Rebecca Marquis

Family lawyer | Nov 27

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Liz is very knowledgeable and incredibly easy to work with. At the same time, Liz is a zealous advocate and works hard to protect her client's interests."

Jared Sandler headshot
Jared Sandler

Family lawyer | Jan 30

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Elizabeth is an excellent attorney who is a strong advocate for her clients."

Joseph C McDaniel headshot
Joseph McDaniel

Chapter 7 bankruptcy lawyer | Jul 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I've known Elizabeth Langford for a lot of years, and I like her and know her to be smart, committed to doing a good job, and hard working. I have referred clients to her in the area of bankruptcy law when they were not a good fit for my practice, and I'm sure I will again."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.3 (Excellent)

Work Experience

2018 - Present

Attorney, The Sampair Group

2018 - Present

Judge Pro Tem, Maricopa County Superior Court

2016 - 2017

Judge Pro Tem, Maricopa Superior Court

1995 - 2018

Owner, Law Offices of Elizabeth S. Langford. P.C.

1990 - 1995

Public Defender, Maricopa County Public Defender Office

Associations

State Bar of Arizona, Family Law Section Association

Education

1990

University of Arizona College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

Arizona State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution