Andrea J. Curry

Mrs Curry was not able to consider basic family law 403 factors in her position to the court and she fell short on being fair and impartial and ended up showing favoritism. Regardless of my direct questions about the concerns I had, she stated she had no formal knowledge or training to adequately be ...a deciding party in the case yet she remained appointed. The courts will always weigh an attorney in this position higher than the actual party in the case who has the real experience, and that is simply a dangerous position to be in with this attorney hired or appointed to your family case. If this attorney is appointed utilize the fact that she has no formal knowledge or training to handle anything other than basic family law, nor any knowledge of the psychology that goes along with it, nor the specific concerns related to parental issues to object to her appointment. Do not allow this attorney to have any active involvement in your case. If you have a complex family court case state that and request a CAA or psych evaluations instead of allowing this attorneys involvement. As the other reviews show this attorney will soak up the money and in the end provide the court with a position that simply alleviates any further burden on her for any kind of appeal. She will provide an opinion of another Judge's ruling or care provider to remove the her liability from her court provided position. Child interviews were not managed appropriately to remove the ability for one parent to coach child prior. This parental issue can skew the standing of the case because this attorney has no expertise in any family related psychology and will be easily swayed by a convincing but dishonest party.