Daryl Manhart

PRO

Daryl Manhart

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 47 years

Appeals Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Appeals, Business, Corporate & Incorporation ... +5 more

702 East Osborn Road Suite 200, Phoenix, AZ

About Daryl

Biography

Practice Areas

8

Practice Areas

Appeals 14%

14%
Business 14%

14%
Commercial Real Estate 14%

14%
Corporate and Incorporation 14%

14%
Lawsuits and Disputes 14%

14%
Litigation 14%

14%
Real Estate 14%

14%
Other 2%

2%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 47 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 1978

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

702 East Osborn Road Suite 200, Phoenix, AZ, 85014

Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

1850 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1700, Phoenix, AZ, 85004

Daryl Manhart's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Daryl Manhart's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Daryl

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

N/A

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1900 - Present

Shareholder, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

1995 - 2004

Adjunct Professor, Grand Canyon University

Associations

State Bar of Arizona

Member

Maricopa County Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association

Member

American Chemical Society

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Lund v. Myers, 2013 WL 3583944 (2013), vacating Lund v. Myers, 286 P.3d 789 (2012)

The procedure the trial judge was to follow was addressed

Mendota v. Gallegos, 302 P.3d 651 (2013)

Appellate court affirmed judgment that facts sufficient to find multiple households and application of policy.

Walsh v. Walsh, 286 P.3d 1095 (2012)

Reversed to require trial court to re-evaluate husband's law practice and his obligation for child support

Lund v. Donahoe, 261 P.3d 456 (2011)

trial court held to have exceeded discretion as to sanction and procedure

Canyon del Rio. v. City of Flagstaff, 258 P.3d 154 (2011)

Dismissal reversed as to principal claims and remanded for case to proceed in trial court

Dooley v. O'Brien, 244 P.3d 586 (2010)

Dismissal affirmed as to fiduciary duty fraudulent conveyance claims, but remanded as to accounting

In re Estate of Zilles, 200 P.3d 1024 (2008)

charitable organization succeeded to residual estate

Haab v. Maricopa County, 191 P.3d 1025 (2008)

upheld dismissal, claim statute non-compliance

Dept. of Econ. Sec. v. Hayden, 115 P.3d 116 (2005)

successfully defeated claim for back payments

Saucedo v. Salvation Army, 24 P.3d 1274 (2001)

adverse ruling reversed in our client's favor

See More Legal Cases

Education

1978

Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1975

Arizona State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

1974

Arizona State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

1977

1977 Arizona State Law Journal 835 "Property and Liberty Limitations on the Dismissal of Arizona Public Employees"

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution