No Photo

Brody J Valerga

1.0
Rating: 7.3

Licensed for 18 years

Litigation Lawyer at Springville, UT
Practice Areas: Litigation, Family, Real Estate ... +2 more

624 E 200 N, Brody Valerga, Springville, UT

About Brody

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Utah for 18 years

State: Utah

Acquired: 2007

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Valerga, PLLC

624 E 200 N, Brody Valerga, Springville, UT, 84663-1516

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Brody J Valerga's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 2
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Mediation

Posted by Vanessa | June 30, 2026 | Hired Attorney

I would not recommend Brody under any circumstances based on my experience.

would not recommend Brody under any circumstances based on my experience. After several years of being represented by him, I can honestly say this was one of the most frustrating and disappointing professional experiences I’ve ever had. Communication throughout my case was extremely poor. Emai...ls routinely went unanswered, phone calls were rarely returned, and I often had to repeatedly call or email just to get updates on my own case. I constantly felt like I had to chase my own attorney for information. Very early in my case, I brought approximately 700 pages of medical records, notes, and supporting documents to his office. I specifically asked that nothing be produced until we had reviewed everything together and determined what was actually relevant. When I returned for our next meeting, I discovered he had already produced the entire file without going through it with me. When I questioned why he had done that after I had specifically asked him not to, he immediately became defensive instead of discussing my concerns. Rather than addressing why the documents had been sent, the conversation shifted to whether he should continue representing me. I left feeling like I couldn’t ask reasonable questions without risking my representation. Unfortunately, that wasn’t an isolated incident. There were multiple occasions throughout my representation where, after asking questions or expressing concerns, I was told he would withdraw from my case. Instead of feeling comfortable communicating with my own attorney, I often felt intimidated into staying quiet. I also felt that I did much of the work myself. I spent countless hours gathering medical records, organizing documentation, preparing timelines, researching issues, and providing supporting information that helped move the case toward mediation. I expected much more involvement, preparation, communication, and strategic guidance from my attorney than I ultimately received. The mediation was conducted over Zoom and was by far the most disappointing part of the entire case. This was the most important day in years of litigation, and I expected my attorney to be focused on my case. Instead, while the mediator and defense were meeting in separate breakout rooms, I was frequently left sitting alone while Brody muted himself, turned off his audio, and worked on other matters. He repeatedly mentioned other meetings and other cases and often seemed rushed, saying he had to leave soon. There was very little communication with me during those periods, and I was left waiting without updates or guidance. I never felt like my case had his full attention during one of the most critical moments of the litigation. Perhaps what disappointed me most was the complete change in how my case was described. This case was accepted on a contingency fee basis, and for years I was told I had a strong case. Then, during mediation, I was told it had never been a very good case and that other attorneys likely would not have taken it. Those two positions were difficult to reconcile. After years of relying on that advice and investing so much time and effort, hearing the exact opposite at the end made me question whether I was being given an objective assessment or simply being encouraged to accept the settlement and move the case to a conclusion. After my experience, I later read another review describing many of the same concerns I had regarding communication and professionalism. It was disappointing to realize that the issues I experienced did not appear to be isolated. No attorney can guarantee an outcome, and that is not my criticism. My criticism is the lack of communication, preparation, professionalism, responsiveness, and client advocacy throughout my case. I never felt that my case was given the attention it deserved. Based on my firsthand experience, I would not hire Brody again, and I cannot recommend him to anyone seeking legal representation.

See All Client Reviews

Brody J Valerga's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Brody

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

James Janghoon Lee headshot
James Lee

Criminal defense lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.3 (Very Good)

Education

2006

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution