Dane OBrien

Dane OBrien

4.8
Rating: 7.4

Licensed for 11 years

General practice Lawyer at San Antonio, TX
Practice Areas: General Practice, Landlord & Tenant, Business ... +3 more

1319 pecan station, San Antonio, TX

About Dane

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 350-350 per hour

Contingency

25%-50%

Pro bono

10 %


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 11 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2014

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

Beyer/OBrien

1319 pecan station, San Antonio, TX, 78258

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Dane OBrien's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.8 /5.0

32 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Contracts & Agreements

Posted by Cathik | September 07, 2024 | Contracts & Agreements

Very helpful and analytical

Dane took my call on a weekend for a consult regarding an employment agreement. He is really passionate about law and explained all legal possibilities very clearly and articulates arguments from all sides. Although, I have a long road ahead for this matter but I feel much better informed and really ...appreciate the opinion shared. I will highly recommend him.

Posted by anonymous | June 14, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Contracts & Agreements

He's great! Until you hire him! Then he took my money and ran!

Prior to retaining Dane, he was fairly helpful and very easy to reach. However, that change once I retained Mr O'Brien on a flat-rate fee arrangement. He rushed me through our meeting when we met to sign the agreement (blamed it on a court appearance he had to rush off to despite the fact that he h...ad previously claimed to be available all afternoon to meet). He also promised to send me a copy of the agreement not later than the following day and to reach out to opposing counsel not later than the following Monday. 4 Days later and I still don't have a copy of the contract and can't get a hold of Dane to save my life! I decided at this point to terminate the relationship since nothing has been done, my check has not been deposited and the contract was not executed (to my knowledge). No harm, no foul! Let's part ways and move on! Well...that would be fine and all but I was then told by Dane that the fee was "non-refundable" and that if I cancel the payment it that it would likely "increase the cost to me" in the end. Since when is it ok for someone to get paid for not doing anything that was promised? Not a single thing that was promised to be done has been accomplished. It's very sad that an attorney has to sink this low.

Dane OBrien

Replied last June 14, 2017

This comment is WHOLLY inaccurate... We will address the issues as they are raised. We had spoken to and advised this person at length prior to the decision to retain our services. In arranging to meet this person to execute the agreement and accept payment they wanted to proceed immediately so I explained that I could meet that day around lunch time or in the afternoon because I had court beginning at 130pm. They agreed to meet near the courthouse at 12pm but didn't show up until 1230pm. I explained that I now had less time before court and we went over the agreement. I explained it all to include the idea of a flat fee. I explained it as the amount that is charged regardless of how much or how little work is ultimately required to accomplish what was agreed. I asked if she understood it all or had any questions, to which she went out of her way to tell me how good her background in these areas were and that it was all ok and she signed (or executed) the contract. At 9pm on that same Friday night we receive a text telling me they had been able to recover the contested property and to wait to do anything until we hear back from them, we agreed and did do not do anything further, including emailing the contract over the weekend. We receive an email from our clients at 0430am on Monday morning indicating that we should now move forward and under what terms. We were able to review this email in the office first thing at 8am, It asks us to contact her if we have questions, we did not. That morning I am in court with my phone off and apparently during that time at 1030am I missed a text asking if I had made contact and at 1pm We received a call and voicemail from the clients mother berating us for being out of contact and threatening to stop payment on the check (it was from her). We were finally able to turn our phone on and receive both the text and voicemail after which we immediately reached out to our clients (who now refuse to answer the phone or call back). Later that evening we receive an email from our clients basically outlining the same as they have here. We responded similarly to how we have here and pointed out that stopping payment and forcing collection efforts could make it more expensive in the end. As for whether work was done or not.... First the agreement was regardless how much or little work was required, Second, there was preliminary work done for these clients...we consulted multiple times, office meeting 1hr, built the client file, attempted contact with opposing counsel. Lastly, how much work was the client expecting to have been accomplished? Signed the agreement at 1230pm Friday and had indicated I had court all afternoon and likely would not be able to reach out to opposing counsel until Monday (they don't work over the weekend). We were told that night at 9pm to stop work. We were told to again start work on Monday at 430am and no longer taking calls by 130pm...... So really, what should have been accomplished by then?? The reality of this issue is that very shortly after entering into an agreement with our firm the facts of our clients situation changed slightly, likely giving them the belief that they no longer needed legal services to accomplish their goal, but rather than contact our firm to discuss this, they have instead made these wild statements in an effort to force the issue and harm our business.

See All Client Reviews

Dane OBrien's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Dane
Charles Christopher Adkins headshot
Charles Adkins

General practice lawyer | Nov 04

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Dane O’Brien provides clear, practical, and well-reasoned answers across a wide range of legal topics in Avvo’s Q&A forum. His responses demonstrate broad knowledge, professionalism, and a genuine commitment to helping people understand their rights and options. Based in San Antonio, Texas, he offers thoughtful, accessible guidance that reflects both legal skill and real concern for clients. I’m pleased to endorse Mr. O’Brien as a knowledgeable and dependable Texas general practice attorney."

Stephen Niermann headshot
Stephen Niermann

Business lawyer | Sep 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Michael Charles Doland headshot
Michael Doland

Business lawyer | Feb 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"The answers of Mr. OBrien are consistently accurate, full of analysis and customized to the needs of the Avvo askers. These are exactly the qualities that every client would look for when hiring an attorney."

John V. DiAna headshot
John DiAna

Landlord or tenant lawyer | Aug 08

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"If you are a landlord or tenant in Texas, I endorse Mr. OBrien. He consistently gives clear and concise legal advice on landlord tenant law as well as in general practice."

David Lawrence Traylor headshot
David Traylor

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

William W Housley headshot
William Housley

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Tough, talented and thorough litigator."

Robert Werner von Dohlen headshot
Robert von Dohlen

General practice lawyer | Sep 23

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

David Conrad Beyer headshot
David Beyer

General practice lawyer | Aug 26

Relationship: Co-worker

"Mr. OBrien is an incredible attorney. He brings dedication and a level of care to each individual case that every attorney should strive for. I endorse this attorney."

View All Endorsements
John V. DiAna headshot
John DiAna

Residential real estate lawyer

David Conrad Beyer headshot
David Beyer

Landlord or tenant lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.4 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Partner, Beyer/OBrien Attorneys At Law

Associations

2013 - Present

Champion Springs HOA

President-Elect

American Bar Association

Member

State Bar of Texas

Member

Education

2013

St. Marys University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2001

University of Maryland, College Park

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution