Gagan W. Khan

Gagan W. Khan

4.5
Rating: 7.7

Licensed for 12 years

Real estate Lawyer at Houston, TX
Practice Areas: Real Estate, Business

701 N. Post Oak Road, Suite 612, Houston, TX

About Gagan

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 12 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2014

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 11 years

State: California

Acquired: 2015

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Vestige Law

701 N. Post Oak Road, Suite 612, Houston, TX, 77024

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Gagan W. Khan's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.5 /5.0

15 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 15 reviews

Posted by Hisham | October 22, 2026 | Hired Attorney

EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTING EXPERIENCE WITH GAGAN KHAN AND VESTIGE LAW, PLLC — $10,000 PAID AND COMPLETE LOSS OF TRUST

I strongly regret hiring attorney Gagan Khan and Vestige Law, PLLC. Prospective clients deserve to know what happened. I paid this law firm $10,000 to represent me in a Texas family-law matter. Instead of competent, attentive representation, I experienced repeated disagreements over fundamental fa...cts, serious concerns about legal strategy, escalating fee demands, and communications I considered insulting and unprofessional. 1. FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND BASIC FACTS ABOUT MY RESIDENCE Despite my repeated explanations that I have been residing in Egypt for approximately two years, my attorney continued to make statements about my Texas residency that I strongly disputed. My physical location and residency are central to my jurisdictional defense. How can an attorney properly represent a client while repeatedly disputing such a fundamental fact? 2. SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 120a I repeatedly emphasized the importance of preserving my Special Appearance and challenging personal jurisdiction under Rule 120a. I disputed my attorney’s interpretation of how procedural filings could affect that jurisdictional objection. I requested a clear explanation supported by controlling legal authority but did not receive an explanation that resolved my concerns. 3. MY INSTRUCTIONS AND PREFERRED LEGAL STRATEGY I wanted a cost-conscious approach that prioritized jurisdictional issues and explored mediation. Instead, I was concerned that the representation was moving toward an expensive litigation strategy that I had not authorized or agreed to fund. 4. OUTRAGEOUS ESCALATION OF PROPOSED LEGAL FEES After paying $10,000, I was confronted with a proposed legal budget exceeding $102,000, with a request for an additional $15,000 retainer. I had already disclosed that my monthly income was $300. The proposed $102,000 represents more than 28 years of my entire income. I found this financially unrealistic and troubling. 5. SERIOUS LOSS OF CONFIDENCE IN MY ATTORNEY’S INDEPENDENCE I became concerned that my attorney appeared to accept disputed representations associated with the opposing party while rejecting my repeated explanations and evidence. This damaged my trust and made me question whether my interests were being independently and adequately protected. I am not presenting an allegation of bribery as an established fact. I am describing my serious concerns and loss of confidence. 6. UNPROFESSIONAL AND INSULTING COMMUNICATIONS After I demanded accountability and a refund, I received an email from Gagan Khan stating: “You can grieve all you want but the contract with the firm dictates the terms. You have an extensive criminal record in the United States. These AI generated emails will not work.” I found this extraordinarily offensive. Rather than addressing my concerns about fees, representation, and legal strategy, my former attorney chose to reference my alleged criminal history and dismiss my written complaints by claiming that I used AI. 7. TERMINATION AND DEMAND FOR A FULL $10,000 REFUND I formally terminated the firm’s representation and requested a complete refund of my $10,000 payment. I dispute the value and appropriateness of the services charged and demand a detailed accounting and full reimbursement. I am prepared to pursue appropriate formal grievance and fee-dispute procedures. MY FINAL ASSESSMENT Hiring Gagan Khan and Vestige Law, PLLC was an extremely expensive and distressing mistake. I lost confidence in the firm’s judgment, communication, understanding of my circumstances, and willingness to follow my instructions. I WOULD NOT HIRE THIS ATTORNEY AGAIN, AND I CANNOT RECOMMEND THIS FIRM BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE. Anyone considering retaining this firm should carefully examine the engagement agreement, projected litigation costs, refund provisions, and the attorney’s proposed strategy before paying a substantial retainer.

Posted by anonymous | January 31, 2024

Exercise caution before you hire her.

My recent engagement with the consultation process has left me feeling quite uneasy, and I feel compelled to share my experience with you. Initially, I was taken aback by the seemingly low consultation fee quoted, leading me to believe I would be attending an in-person office consultation. However..., on the day of the meeting, there was an unexpected shift to a phone meeting facilitated by an assistant. This assistant consistently sought advice from Gagan for every question, creating a palpable air of uncertainty and raising concerns about the professionalism of the consultation. Expressing my preference for an in-person meeting before making any decisions, I agreed to a $500 per hour consultation fee. Much to my surprise, a subsequent call from the office clerk revealed a rather unconventional requirement – the need to retain services for a minimum of 7 hours before scheduling an initial meeting. This request struck me as unusual and impractical, as it seemed counterintuitive to retain services before the crucial initial consultation. This entire process has left me feeling hesitant and wary about moving forward. The request to retain services before the initial meeting appears unconventional and, frankly, concerning. I believe it's essential for others to exercise caution when dealing with this individual in the consultation process.

Posted by Michael | September 03, 2018 | Hired Attorney

Excelent service

Ms. Khan was exceptional, organized and detail oriented. She understood the situation and set up plans to sustain my rights. With her exceptional service, I was able to restore my money and with compensation too without having to wait long for the court to rule out. I would certainly recommend her. ...

Posted by anonymous | July 27, 2018 | Hired Attorney

Delivered a Well-Crafted and Airtight Contract Document

As an early stage oil and gas tech start-up we hired Ms. Khan to draft a shareholder agreement that co-founders and early employers can sign. Ms. Khan exceeded our expectation with a well-crafted and airtight document that addresses even potential shareholder problems that may arise any time in a l...ife of a start-up. For example, she has put in place articles that do not allow unrestricted transfer of shares to spouses of shareholder (which is a real problem in the case of a divorce). The fact that she managed to see and take care of items what we did not know impressed us. It also shows her skills to assess the clients’ needs and the dedication to the clients cause. We look forward to continuing our business with Ms. Khan.

Posted by anonymous | July 25, 2018 | Hired Attorney

She got a six digit judgement dismissed!

Ms. Khan represented me after I got a 6 digit judgement against me in federal court with a different attorney. I went to Ms. Khan and asked for possible solutions. She quickly strategized to get the judgement dismissed and proceeded with the case getting me excellent results at the end! No judgement ...against me in a tough federal court case! I would recommend her to anyone looking for a tough litigator.

See All Client Reviews

Gagan W. Khan's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Gagan
Paul Neil Youngblood headshot
Paul Youngblood

Divorce and separation lawyer | Oct 16

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. It's rare to meet a lawyer more compassionate and thoughtful than Gagan."

Rahul Aggarwal headshot
Rahul Aggarwal

Unknown lawyer | Mar 13

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"An excellent lawyer who treats clients with patience, care, understanding, and utmost professionalism - an even better person and I wholeheartedly recommend for future services."

Michael Glynn Busby Jr. headshot
Michael Busby

Family lawyer | Jun 14

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Good lawyer. Fights for her clients. Does not back down."

View All Endorsements
Annie Laverne Scott headshot
Annie Scott

Divorce and separation lawyer

Jason Castaneda headshot
Jason Castaneda

Family lawyer

Gary Dean Wingfield headshot
Gary Wingfield

Real estate lawyer

William F. Harmeyer headshot
William Harmeyer

Real estate lawyer

Jarrie D. Mccarty headshot
Jarrie Mccarty

Child custody lawyer

Andrew David Brink headshot
Andrew Brink

Tax lawyer

Michael Glynn Busby Jr. headshot
Michael Busby

Family lawyer

Tej Rashmi-Deep Paranjpe headshot
Tej Paranjpe

Personal injury lawyer

Rajesh Mahadass headshot
Rajesh Mahadass

Personal injury lawyer

Kristen Marie Miller headshot
Kristen Miller

Family lawyer

Siri Gurmukh Singh Khalsa headshot
Siri Khalsa

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.7 (Very Good)

Honors

2019

Top Lawyer 2019, Houstonia Magazine - Houston, Texas

2017

Most Outstanding New Member, Houston Bar Association

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Managing Partner, G.K. Law PLLC

2019 - 2019

Special Commissioner, Harris County Court at Law No. 3 - By the Honorable Judge LaShawn Williams

2019 - 2019

Special Commissioner, Harris County Court at Law No. 4 - By the Honorable Judge Leslie Briones

2017 - 2019

Special Commissioner, Harris County Court at Law No. 1 - By the Honorable Judge George Barnstone

2013 - 2013

Law Clerk, US District Court, CA

Associations

2016 - Present

United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Member

2014 - Present

State Bar of Texas

Member

2013 - Present

State Bar of California - Inactive

Member

2010 - 2013

Tax Law Society

Member

2006 - 2007

Phi Kappa Phi - Honor Society

Member

Education

2013

Southwestern University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2009

University of Houston, main campus

Certificate of Accountancy Program -CPA Eligible

2007

University of Houston, main campus

BA - Bachelor of Arts in Finance

Speaking Engagements

2019

University of Houston Law Center

Real Estate and Business Law

2018

University of Houston Law Center

Business Law

2017

University of Houston Law Center

Consumer Law Clinic

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution