Howard LaMar Huntington

Howard LaMar Huntington

also known as Tad Huntington

5.0
Rating: 9.5

Licensed for 27 years

Litigation Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Litigation, Business, Insurance

500 West Madison Street, Suite 3900, Chicago, IL

About Howard

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Litigation 70%

Defending insureds in personal injury matters including construction, vehicular and products liability matters.

12 years

70%
Business 20%

Representing corporations, banks, entrepreneurs, and family owned businesses in business disputes including breach of contract, Uniform Commercial Code, and business torts. Additionally, representing construction companies, subcontractors and municipalities in breach of construction contracts and mechanics liens.

12 years

20%
Insurance 10%

12 years

10%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Indiana for 25 years

State: Indiana

Acquired: 2000

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois for 27 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1998

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Franco Moroney Buenik LLC

500 West Madison Street, Suite 3900, Chicago, IL, 60661

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Howard LaMar Huntington's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (1)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Agnieszka | April 19, 2012

Howard the Great

Howard has been and still is very responsible and reliable legal advisor. I have known him for over 2 years and I strongly recommend his services.

See All Client Reviews

Howard LaMar Huntington's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Howard

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Deborah Dencer Lollis headshot
Deborah Lollis

Divorce and separation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.5 (Superb)

Honors

2019

Illinois Super Lawyers, Illinois Super Lawyers

2018

Illinois Super Lawyers, Illinois Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Illinois Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Illinois Super Lawyers

2015

Chicago's Top Rated Lawyers of 2015, The National Law Journal

2014

Chicago's Top Rated Lawyers of 2014, The National Law Journal

2013

Chicago's Legal Leaders Top Rated Lawyers, The National Law Journal

2012

One of the "40 Illinois Attorneys Under 40 to Watch"., Chicago Daily Law Bulletin

2011

"AV Preeminent" peer review rated - highest rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

Harrison Legal Writing Award (2nd Place Recipient), Indiana State Bar Association

Work Experience

2021 - Present

Partner, Franco Moroney Buenik LLC

2019 - 2021

Partner, Harrison & Held, LLP

2014 - 2019

Partner, Bullaro & Carton, P.C.

2012 - 2014

Attorney, Mahoney, Silverman & Cross, LLC

2005 - 2012

Partner, Williams Montgomery & John Ltd.

2003 - 2005

Associate, Bullaro & Carton, P.C.

2001 - 2003

Associate, Knight Hoppe Kurnik & Knight LLC

1998 - 2001

Associate, James B. Carroll & Associates

Associations

2014 - Present

Claims & Litigation Management Alliance

Member

Illinois State Bar Association

Member

Indiana State Bar Association

Member

NESA Chicago, the Chicago Chapter of the National Eagle Scout Association

Chairman

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Cooper v. Briggs-Rosalind Development, LLC

Achieved $5,000 settlement defending local public entity in construction injury matter involving 2 fusion low-back surgeries and 3 elbow surgeries with $300K in specials.

Hobbs v. John

Local counsel - Complete dismissal of all claims on motion to dismiss. Affirmed by United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Brown v. Seals

Dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction

Native American Arts, Inc. v. Contract Specialties, Inc.

Won motion for dismissal of case against jewelry manufacturer client for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Sim v. Worstell Construction

Achieved nuisance value arbitration decision of $1,000

Shelt-Seymore v. City of Elkhart

Won partial summary judgment

Sergott v. Canteen Corp.

Secured favorable settlement on behalf of defendant in face of pending motion for summary judgment.

Janco Composites, Inc. v. Acra Electric Corp.

Case settled in face of pending motion for summary judgment.

Dal Pozzo v. Basic Machinery Company, Inc.

Seventh Circuit affirmed trial court's award of costs and attorneys' fees against opposing third-party defendant as sanction for post-settlement obstructionism requiring motion to enforce settlement agreement.

Salazar v. Technistone USA, Inc.

Achieved favorable confidential settlement.

Jensen v. City of Wilmington, et al.

Court of Appeals affirmed judgment of dismissal.

Mildred v. Mayson

Won motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in action for wrongful death arising from fatal collision in Indiana. Motion granted despite allegations that defendant acquired the vehicle involved in Illinois and owed debts in Illinois.

Hall v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.

Achieved favorable and confidential settlement on behalf of defendant hotel in premises liability action for wrongful death of successful English attorney.

Baldridge v. Dallas & Mavis Specialized Carrier Co.

Case confidentially resolved.

Acorn Metal Services, Inc. v. Universal Industries

Won judgment on behalf of plaintiff against customer that refused to pay for specially manufactured sheet metal.

Neddef v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District, et al.

Court granted summary judgment for defendants.

Irving v. City of Elkhart, et al.

The court entered summary judgment for the defendant finding no adverse job action.

Reipsa v. Trump Indiana, Inc., et al.

Court granted motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.

National Insurance Crime Bureau, et al v. Daniels, et al.

Court granted preliminary injunction.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois

JD - Juris Doctor

1995

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2014

"WAVE 2" business class

The Legal Profession

2013

WJOL 1340 AM - Radio Interview Copyright Litigation

2012

Indiana State Bar Association's Why Lincoln Was a Lawyer Why Lincoln Was a Lawyer

2012

German American Chamber of Commerce of the Midwest Primer on American Product Liability Insurance and Law

Publications

2017

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel - 2016 Survey of Law Survey of Tort Law, co-author

2016

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel's IDC Quarterly Beyond HIPAA: Solving the Puzzle of Properly Acquiring Mental Health Records in Litigation

2016

2016

2014

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel - IDC Quarterly The IDC Monograph: Tort Immunity Act

2014

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel's 2013 Survey of Law Pedestrian Crossing Intersection Lacking Crosswalk not an Intended User of Village Street

2013

Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel - 2012 Survey of Law County Forest Preserve District DId Not 'Knowingly Permit' Stray Dogs in Woods, Despite Prior Incidents

2012

IDC Defense Update - Local Government Law Committee of the Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel "Volunteered" Web Design Services Are Not a "Contribution" Or "Electioneering" Under Election Code

2010

In-House Defense Quarterly (DRI, Defense Research Institute) Dangerous Territory: How the Indian Arts and Crafts Act Can Ruin Your Business

2010

Res Gestae (Indiana State Bar Association) Expanding While Contracting: The Dynamic State of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Indiana
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution