Patrick Duffy Richards

Patrick Duffy Richards

also known as Patrick Richards

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 25 years

Patent application Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Trademark Application, Intellectual Property, Copyright Application

233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL

About Patrick

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 400-500 per hour

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 25 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 2000

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Richards Patent Law

233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60606

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Patrick Duffy Richards's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (7) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 7 reviews | 5 stars

Posted by anonymous | March 31, 2015 | Intellectual Property

Patent and Trademarking Services

Patrick is one of the most responsive professionals we have ever worked with. His team works around the clock to meet deadlines and their profound knowledge of law greatly helps our team find direction and answers. Patrick was also kind enough to share recommendations of other attorneys in his netwo...rk when we required services outside of his expertise. We highly recommend reaching out to Richards Patent law for your legal needs.

Posted by anonymous | March 10, 2014 | Intellectual Property

Use Patrick Richards for all of your IP needs

I found Patrick after working with a few large, downtown law firms. When you engage a large firm as a small company on a budget, you usually receive junior advice but still at large firm rates. Patrick, on the other hand, provides senior/partner-level advice at very reasonable rates. But it goes way ...beyond the dollars. His willingness to help a small business is very apparent from the first time you speak with him. He takes a real interest in your business and project and spends time getting to know your needs and goals. Patrick will look at all angles of a project and always provides sound, practical advice...and always keeps the project's budget in mind. Patrick's accessibility and response time are great. I strongly recommend him for any business's IP needs. His methodical approach to the patent and trademark process, while always keeping budget in mind, are particularly appealing to entrepreneurial ventures and small businesses.

Posted by Gary | March 04, 2014 | Intellectual Property

I feel extremely fortunate to have come across Patrick as early as I did

I feel extremely fortunate to have come across Patrick as early as I did in my search for a patent attorney. From the initial meeting I received a sense that Patrick had a very personal approach to working with his clients and was not looking at simply obtaining another client from whom he could extr...act business. Given that style, in addition to his tremendous experience, I felt extremely comfortable listening to Patrick’s thoughts and recommendations w/ respect to my ideas, albeit not all of which I was happy to hear at first. In the end I truly believe his guidance helped me save a substantial amount of time, not to mention money, in helping to refine my overly broad concepts into those which are truly valuable and protectable. In addition, I have been able to lean on Patrick’s expertise in other business/legal areas to help negotiate a lucrative agreement not related to our business together. I will definitely continue to use Patrick for all of my IP related needs and will recommend others to consider him as well.

Posted by Allison | January 13, 2012 | Patent Application

Knowledgeable, trustworthy, reliable patent lawyer

Attempting to put into words the passion, integrity, commitment and knowledge demonstrated by Patrick does not do justice to the superb work and guidance that he has shown me and my partner throughout our journey, from the patent filing process to the steep learning curve of bringing a medical device... to market. Patrick is an unending source of support, resources and intellect coupled with a constant enthusiasm and drive to succeed. I feel honored to have Patrick as our patent lawyer and am ever-grateful of his dedication to our goals. From the onset, Patrick makes your journey his own and completes every milestone, both joyous and difficult, with you. His genuine persona fosters mutual trust and respect among all stakeholders, thus driving the success of any project. I would recommend Patrick’s services to any individual searching for a dedicated, resourceful and trustful patent lawyer. And I remain truly thankful that I can depend on Patrick for all of my IP needs.

Posted by Chris | January 08, 2012 | Intellectual Property

Excellent Patent Attorney

When I decided that it was time to file my patent, I chose to consult Patrick first because his website articulated the vision of what I wanted my ideal patent attorney to be. As an outsider to the world of intellectual property, I had no other basis on which to make that decision. To my delight, h...e was able to assimilate the complex mechanical and anatomic details of my medical device during our initial consultation. Now a year and a half later I can further say that Patrick's drive, integrity, and passion for his craft are evident in every interaction that I have had with him - without exception. I have had the opportunity to network with a number of Patrick's other clients since I filed with him, and whether they are newbie's like myself or seasoned businessmen, we all have the same admiration of Patrick's approach to our unique problems. What makes Patrick special is that he combines creativity and enthusiasm with a knowledge of the world of IP that is as detailed as it is vast. If this is your first time filing a patent, I can assure you that this journey will be both difficult and exhilarating, but Patrick will be there for you every step of the way. If this is your 50th patent, Patrick will suggest practical improvements to your IP strategy that will make you wish that you had hired him earlier. There is simply no better person to take your next big idea to.

See All Client Reviews

Patrick Duffy Richards's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Patrick
Jeffrey Moisan headshot
Jeffrey Moisan

Intellectual property lawyer | Oct 14

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

Natalie Ann Remien headshot
Natalie Remien

Patent application lawyer | Apr 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Patrick is an excellent lawyer. Detail-oriented, responsive and friendly, Patrick is the "go-to" resource for high quality patent work. Patrck's high integrity and knowledge and expertise in his field makes him an asset to the profession."

Stephen Thomas Scherrer headshot
Stephen Scherrer

Intellectual property lawyer | Aug 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I highly endorse Patrick's work. I worked with Patrick for almost ten years when we were both attorneys at McDermott Will & Emery. Patrick has a sharp mind for intellectual property law. He handled many patent application projects with superb technical ability. He is also very personable, and has a great ability to communicate effectively complex intellectual property law matters to clients."

Scott Alan Andresen headshot
Scott Andresen

Patent application lawyer | Jun 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Patrick is an attorney who "gets it." He is the rare combination of professional expertise and pedigree who also understands that "running the clock" on clients is to be avoided in favor of developing long-lasting relationships. When it comes to patent referrals, Patrick is my guy."

View All Endorsements
Natalie Ann Remien headshot
Natalie Remien

Intellectual property lawyer

Stephen Thomas Scherrer headshot
Stephen Scherrer

Patent application lawyer

Scott Alan Andresen headshot
Scott Andresen

Entertainment lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2016

Peer Rated AV Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Emerging Lawyer, Leading Lawyers Network

2015

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Peer Rated AV Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Rising Star, SuperLawyers

2014

Rising Star, SuperLawyers

2014

Peer Rated AV Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Peer Rated AV Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Rising Star, SuperLawyers

2012

Peer Review Rating AV Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Rising Star, SuperLawyers

2011

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

Client Rated 5.0 Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Adjunct Professor, Pritzker Northwestern School of Law

2013 - Present

Chief Strategy Officer, Resonance Medical, LLC

2009 - Present

Owner, Richards Patent Law

2000 - 2008

Partner, McDermott Will & Emery

Associations

2016 - Present

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

2015 - Present

Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago

Member

2011 - Present

Chicago Business Lawyers Network

Group Lead

Chicago Bar Association

Member

Illinois State Bar Association

Member

Chicago Bar Association

Intellectual Property Law Committee

Chicago Bar Association, Young Lawyers Section

Intellectual Property Committe

Chicago Bar Association

Solo/Small Firm Practitioners Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

LSI Industries, Inc. v. ImagePoint Inc.

Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Interlogix, Inc.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2000

University of Virginia School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2013

Northwestern University - McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science

IP Q&A Session

2013

Communication Law & Ethics at DePaul University

Intellectual Property in Communications

2013

CBA Media & Entertainment Committee Meeting

3D Printing and Intellectual Property

2013

1871

Ounces of Prevention: Opportunities to protect your early stage business and create a solid foundation for growth

2012

Notre Dame Law School

Patent Law after the AIA

2012

Northwestern University - McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science

IP Q&A Session

2012

Entrepreneurs Unplugged Startup Law Summit

IP Roundtable Discussion

2011

Notre Dame Law School

Patent Analysis for Industrial Designs

2011

Northwestern University - McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science

IP Q&A Session

2011

Columbia College Chicago

Sports Related Patents

2010

ITA Legal Advisory Roundtable Intellectual Property in New Product Development

2010

DePaul’s Kellstadt Graduate School of Business

Patent Law for Startups

2005

McDermott IP Presentation

Business Method Patents

2003

Univeristy of Illinois Chicago Engineering Society

Careers in Intellectual Property Law

2002

Saint Louis University School of Law

Life as a Patent Attorney

2001

Presentation to the Illinois Paralegal Association

What a Patent Attorney Needs from a Patent Paralegal

Publications

2010

Intellectual Property Rights Guide Newsletter What's the Value of Intellectual Property

2010

Richards Patent Law Website Patent Reform 2010

2009

Richards Patent Law Website Can I Patent My Invention?

2009

2009

Richards Patent Law Website What are the Stages of the Patent Process?

2009

Richards Patent Law Website How Much Does a Patent Cost?

2003

Mass High Tech: The Journal of New England Technology Make Protecting Your Inventions Globally a Priority

2001

2001 Biotech Law and Litigation Summit Legal Implications for Patent Genomics and Proteomics: A Closer Look at the Differences Between the United States and the United Kingdom

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution