Michael A Henderson

Michael A Henderson

also known as Mike

5.0
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 28 years

Appeals Lawyer at Sioux Falls, SD
Practice Areas: Appeals, Litigation, Contracts & Agreements ... +2 more

2121 W 63rd Place, Suite 200, Sioux Falls, SD

About Michael

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in South Dakota for 28 years

State: South Dakota

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Michael A Henderson

2121 W 63rd Place, Suite 200, Sioux Falls, SD, 57108

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael A Henderson's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (1)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Sara | February 19, 2019 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

Very thorough lawyer and upfront

I really liked talking with Mike. He is down-to-earth and personable but very knowledgeable and experienced also. He took his time to analyze the information presented to give me his opinion. He was very frank about the positive and negatives and actually listened to my thoughts. I cannot recommend M...ike more - if you need to appeal something, call Mike!

See All Client Reviews

Michael A Henderson's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael
Amanda Work headshot
Amanda Work

Litigation lawyer | Feb 16

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mike is an exceptional attorney with years of experience that allows him to represent his clients best interests and explain the legal premises to his clients so they understand. He mentors other attorneys and has a calm demeanor and presence. Mike is definitely someone to call if you need help."

Taylor Hayes headshot
Taylor Hayes

Litigation lawyer | Feb 16

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mike's years of experience make him well qualified for any litigation or contract issue. He is well-spoken, highly skilled, and works very hard for his clients."

Brooke Swier Schloss headshot
Brooke Swier Schloss

Appeals lawyer | Feb 16

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"Mike Henderson is both personable and highly competent. He is able to analyze the facts of the legal issue while applying current legal rulings to help his client achieve the best results possible."

Jacob B Fischer headshot
Jacob Fischer

Litigation lawyer | Dec 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mike is a great litigator. He understands how to make the most compelling case on an issue. He is thorough in his research and eloquent in his argument."

Ashley Anson headshot
Ashley Anson

Appeals lawyer | Dec 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mike is extremely thorough in his review of contracts and agreements. He is an excellent writer and takes his Appellate work seriously. A friendly and down-to-earth guy who understands appellate procedure in depth. Mike makes it his sole legal focus to help you appeal decisions and enforce the checks and balances of the legal system to his client's benefits and best interests."

Lindsay M. Harris headshot
Lindsay Harris

Appeals lawyer | Dec 19

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mike is one the foremost appellate attorneys in the state of South Dakota. His expertise and past experience make him a fierce opponent and a staunch advocate for his clients. You will not find a more dedicated and knowledgable attorney in his field."

Scott R. Swier headshot
Scott Swier

Appeals lawyer | Mar 11

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mike Henderson has a keen analytic mind and an excellent understanding of appellate law. Mike is one of the foremost appellate attorneys in South Dakota."

View All Endorsements
Colleen E Scrocca headshot
Colleen Scrocca

Business lawyer

Scott R. Swier headshot
Scott Swier

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer

Brooke Swier Schloss headshot
Brooke Swier Schloss

Estate planning lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

1997

Thomas Sterling Honor Graduate, University of South Dakota School of Law

1997

Dean's List, University of South Dakota School of Law

1996

Lead Articles Editor, South Dakota Law Review

1996

Published Comment Writer, South Dakota Law Review

1996

Dean's List, University of South Dakota School of Law

1995

Dean's List, University of South Dakota School of law

1995

Corpus Juris Secundum Award, University of South Dakota School of Law

1995

Dean's Certificate for Outstanding Performance in Criminal Law, University of South Dakota School of Law

1995

West Publishing Award for Outstanding Performance, West Publishing

1995

Alan Bogue Excellence in Writing Scholarship, University of South Dakota School of Law

1994

Michael F. Pieplow Memorial Scholarship, University of South Dakota School of Law

1994

Law School Foundation Scholarship, University of South Dakota School of Law

1994

McCusick Law Scholarship, University of South Dakota School of Law

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Attorney, Swier Law Firm, Prof. LLC

2012 - 2015

Attorney, Freelance Legal Writing and Research

1998 - 2012

Attorney, Cadwell Sanford Deibert & Garry LLP

1997 - 1998

Law Clerk, United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Associations

1998 - Present

South Dakota State Bar

Member

1998 - Present

United States District Court for the District of South Dakota

Member

1997 - Present

Eighth Circuit Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Stanga v. Husman, 694 N.W.2d 716 (S.D. 2005)

Summary judgment affirmed

Tiede v. Cortrust Bank, 748 N.W.2d 748 (S.D. 2008)

Judgment on the pleadings for defendant reversed

McDowell v. Citicorp, 734 N.W.2d 14 (S.D. 2007)

Summary judgment for defendant affirmed

O’Neill v. O’Neill, 876 N.W.2d 486 (S.D. 2016)

Award of punitive damages vacated

American Family Mut. Ins. Group v. Kostaneski, 688 N.W.2d 410 (S.D. 2004)

Summary judgment in favor of insurer affirmed

First Dakota Nat. Bank v. Performance Eng. & Mfg., Inc., 676 N.W.2d 395 (S.D. 2004)

Summary judgment in favor of secured creditor affirmed

Hanig v. City of Winner, 692 N.W.2d 202 (S.D. 2005)

Summary judgment in favor of City reversed

Read v. McKennan Hospital, 610 N.W.2d 782 (S.D. 2000)

Grant of summary judgment in favor of radiologist affirmed

Fryer v. Kranz, 616 N.W.2d 102 (S.D. 2000)

Denial of summary judgment in favor of insurer reversed

Hanig v. City of Winner, 527 F.3d 674 (8th Cir. 2008)

Summary judgment affirmed

In re Northwestern Corp. Securities Litigation, 329 F.Supp.2d 1105 (D.S.D. 2004)

Court ordered appointment of lead plaintiff

Van Duysen v. Van Duysen, 871 N.W.2d 613 (S.D. 2015)

Determination of primary custody affirmed

VanGorp v. Sieff, 624 N.W.2d 712 (S.D. 2001)

Summary judgment affirmed

Hollander v. Douglas County, 620 N.W.2d 181 (S.D. 2000)

Decision of board of county commissioners affirmed

Richland State Bank v. Household Credit Serv., 340 F.Supp.2d 1051 (D.S.D. 2004)

Summary judgment granted in part and denied in part

E.E.O.C. v. Merchants State Bank, 554 F.Supp.2d 959 (D.S.D. 2008)

Order allowing employee to intervene affirmed

Fuller v. Croston, 725 N.W.2d 600 (S.D. 2006)

Summary judgment in favor of seller reversed

Setliff v. Akins, 616 N.W.2d 878 (S.D. 2000)

Grant of summary judgment in favor of departing physician reversed in part and affirmed in part

Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern R.R. v. Schieffer, 744 F.Supp.2d 987 (D.S.D. 2010)

Dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiciton

Novotny v. Tripp County, 664 F.3d 1173 (8th Cir. 2011)

Summary judgment for Defendant affirmed

Daily v. City of Sioux Falls, 802 N.W.2d 905 (S.D. 2011)

Judgment for Plaintiff affirmed

Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern R.R. v. Schieffer, 648 F.3d 935 (8th Cir. 2011)

Lack of ERISA plan affirmed, remanded on other grounds for further proceedings

Nine v. City of Brookings, 797 N.W.2d 73 (S.D. 2011)

Judgment for Plaintiff affirmed

State v. Gutnik, 790 N.W.2d 495 (S.D. 2010)

Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction reversed

Lykken v. Brady, 622 F.3d 925 (8th Cir. 2010)

Summary Judgment for defendant affirmed

Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern R.R. v. Schieffer, 742 F.Supp.2d 1055 (D.S.D. 2010)

Motion for injunction denied

Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern R.R. v. Schieffer, 857 F.Supp.2d 886 (D.S.D. 2012)

Dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiciton following remand

Ronan v. Sanford Health, 809 N.W.2d 834 (S.D. 2012)

Jury verdict for Defendants affirmed

Pinnacle Pizza Co. v. Little Caesar Enterprises, 598 F.3d 970 (8th Cir. 2010)

Summary judgment for defendant affirmed

Neve v. Davis, 775 N.W.2d 80 (S.D. 2009)

Judgment notwithstanding the verdict reversed

Armstrong v. Turner County, 772 N.W.2d 643 (S.D. 2009)

Denial of writ of certiorari reversed

Ehresmann v. Muth, 757 N.W.2d 402 (S.D. 2008)

Summary judgment for defendant reversed

Fin-Ag v. Watertown Livestock, 754 N.W.2d 23 (S.D. 2008)

Summary Judgment for plaintiff reversed

McDowell v. Citicorp, 752 N.W.2d 209 (S.D. 2008)

Denial of motion to amend complaint affirmed

Pinncale Pizza v. Little Caesar Enterprises, 560 F.Supp.2d 786 (D.S.D. 2008)

Summary judgment for defendant

See More Legal Cases

Education

1997

University of South Dakota School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1994

University of South Dakota

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Publications

1996

South Dakota Law Review Today's Symbolic Speech Dilemma: Flag Desecration and the Proposed Constituional Amendment

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution