Michael Joseph Haskell

Michael Joseph Haskell

also known as Mike Haskell

4.7
Rating: 8.9

Licensed for 22 years

Family Lawyer at Grand Rapids, MI
Practice Areas: Family, Divorce & Separation, Litigation, Mediation

2812 East Beltline Lane, Suite B, Grand Rapids, MI

About Michael

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 16 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 2010

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Louisiana for 21 years

State: Louisiana

Acquired: 2004

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 22 years

State: California

Acquired: 2003

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Haskell Law, PC

2812 East Beltline Lane, Suite B, Grand Rapids, MI, 49525

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael Joseph Haskell's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

15 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 7 reviews | Character & Conduct

Posted by anonymous | August 26, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Above and beyond

Mike was amazing and I exceeded my expectations for a respectable and organized attorney. He was smart, dependable and didn’t let anything slip through the cracks. He took the burden off of me and made me feel at ease in the entire process. Due to his organization, quick thinking, and experience we ...were able to meet my desired outcome for my case. I can’t thank him enough for what he has done for me! Thanks again mike! Nicole Bergman

Posted by anonymous | August 22, 2014 | Child Custody

Very Disappointed

I retained Mike for 5K. He promptly let his paralegal go and never hired another. When contacted, Mike was often out of state, in CA, or working on other cases. I believe Mike was overwhelmed with handling all the duties normally done by a paralegal, in addition to his regular work. Mike filed ...no documents with the court on my behalf. Not one. All I needed was for him to file a contempt motion against the mother of my child, and then represent me in court. Mike neglected to file a change of attorney form, though I asked him to do so. I believe this was intentional. Mike assured me that 5K would be sufficient to file a motion, and appear on my behalf. It took Mike over a month to review the documents with which I supplied him. I have documentation that proves this.. I communicated with Mike for 5 months about relevant developments pertaining to my case. After 5 months without any motions filed, I finally asked how much of my retainer was left. Mike replied with an email showing that the initial 5K retainer was spent, and I now owed over $4000 for "all the communication", in addition to the retainer amount. Mike explained that he was charging me a total of over $9,000 for "reading emails", reading other "documents pertaining to my case", 'talking to 'experts'', and "doing research" over 5 months of time. In order for him to file a motion and appear, I was told by Mike he would need another $5,000. In total, Mike was requiring close to $15,000 to do what he assured me he would accomplish for $5,000 in our initial meeting. I attempted to reason with him saying "if he had acted on my behalf sooner, there would not have been an opportunity for all the communication for which I was charged". Mike became very defensive and adversarial in his communication when I imparted this to him. I spent significant time directing Mike to documents at his request. These documents had already been given to him in the form of a thumb drive, and in the form of a binder complete with a table of contents, so any document could be easily found. Nevertheless, I was charged for Mike to make these requests, and charged for my responses to these requests, though Mike should have been able to find any of the requested document easily, as he had them in both digital and paper form. I wasted a few weeks contacting experts, under Mike's direction, that Mike seemed to be unfamiliar with, as they could not do the type of evaluations Mike insisted that I needed. I was charged for corresponding with Mike when following up with him to tell him the experts I was directed to, by him, could not do what Mike was asking. I felt that during the few telephone conversations we had, Mike kept me on the phone longer than was necessary, regardless of my attempts to shorten the conversation, in order to run the clock. When I finally begged Mike to file a motion and appear in court on my behalf, he insisted that I allow him to put a lien on my house and implied he would do nothing for me if I did not. He then quickly became adversarial in his correspondence when I refused to put a lien on my house. I finally severed the attorney client relationship, secured another attorney, and had a court date within a month. I paid under 7K for TWO appearances with another attorney, rather than 15K, with Mike, for one appearance.

Michael Haskell

Replied last August 22, 2014

Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to respond to this story because 1) the person does not identify him or herself, and 2) regardless of who the author is, the statements are all false. Furthermore, I still have an obligation to protect my former clients, even if it is from him or herself, which I believe is the case in this situation. Even if I knew with certainty who the author was, I would avoid discussing why each allegation is false, because I believe it would severely prejudice him/her in his/her current legal dispute. Therefore, I will not address the allegations in this story with specificity, even at cost to my professional reputation. I would simply caution the author regarding two things a) libel is an actionable offense, and b) it appears to me that, if you were indeed a client, you have waived attorney/client privilege on all the topics you specifically list here, regardless of whether your text is fact or fiction. In other words, should your opponent read this, and send discovery to me, I do not believe our conversations would be protected. Consequently, I would encourage the author to contact my offices to see if something can be worked out regarding any dispute, as I believe it may be in his or her best interest.

Posted by Stephanie | July 06, 2014

High Integrity, Solution-Oriented & Professional - Highly Recommended

Not only have I sought legal counsel from Mr. Haskell, I have referred him to friends and colleagues as well. If I'm going to offer a referral, it is a reflection of my own personal standards thus they are very hard earned with me. Over several years, Mr. Haskell has continually exceeded my high ...expectations. He is prompt in responding to me even outside of traditional office hours, is thorough in his questioning as to be clear on the depth of an issue, has always been expeditious in delivering updates, and is very honest - even when he has had to tell me what I don't want to hear. Mr. Haskell is explicitly clear in his communication and offers exceptional insight on case law as to encourage my own knowledge building. Most of all, he is fair, ethical, and reasonable. When working with Mike, I have never experienced a feeling doubt, something I have found to be common amongst other lawyers. It's encouraging to know that I am in good hands when working with him. Just as importantly, I am thrilled to share that everyone I have referred Mr. Haskell is equally satisfied. Outcomes regularly exceed expectations. I intend to continue referring Mr. Haskell to those in need of superb legal services and will undoubtedly maintain his services as needed. He's truly exceptional and highly recommended.

Posted by Tom | March 10, 2014 | Divorce & Separation

MASTERFULL!!!!

In May of 2013 Mike Haskell was recommended to me through a friend. I previously had a consultation with another attorney regarding my decision to file for Divorce and Custody of my son. Let me say that from my first conversation with Mike I knew he was different and the right person to represent my ...son and I. Working with Mike for months I never thought he didn't have everything under control. I never felt misled or never got the feeling he was in it for the money. Through these months there were things that came up and Mike was quick and ready to act. On most occasions he knew what was coming before the defense did. Mike was always 100% honest. He would answer all questions honestly no matter if it was good or bad and explain everything top to bottom. The most important thing of all is that Mike was always inclined to do what was right for my son. If you want an attorney with outstanding communication skills, judgment, interpersonal skills, analytical skills, and perseverance you have come to the right man. Hire Mike, sit back, and watch a MASTER at his craft.

Michael Haskell

Replied last March 10, 2014

Thank you! It has been a pleasure.

Posted by anonymous | September 05, 2012 | Domestic Violence

TRULY PROFESSIONAL & COMPASSIONATE

During a very difficult and lengthy harassment issue, Mike remained unwaveringly professional and truly showed compassion for me as a client. When a former relationship ended, the other party took to verbal harassment, cyber stalking, and emotional abuse. Mike was always readily available and ens...ured I felt my case was a priority at all times. I give him complete credit for my ability to now live without fear of an enraged ex-boyfriend. I would recommend him for any legal issues, as I know, without doubt, he would give every case his complete attention, dedication, professionalism, and personal compassion.

See All Client Reviews

Michael Joseph Haskell's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael
Dominick R. Dolci headshot
Dominick Dolci

Divorce and separation lawyer | May 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Mark V. Clay headshot
Mark Clay

Family lawyer | Aug 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I highly endorse Mr. Haskell. Very experienced and caring attorney who produces great results in representing clients! I want all people with legal problems to contact him first."

James Brice Newell headshot
James Newell

Mediation lawyer | Jul 17

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Michael. He is well respected among fellow lawyers."

Laurie Kay Schmitt headshot
Laurie Schmitt

Family lawyer | May 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Jonathan Pierre Lacour headshot
Jonathan Lacour

Unknown lawyer | May 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"One of the absolute best. Exceptional attention to detail, service next to none. I endorse this lawyer."

David S. Soble headshot
David Soble

Divorce and separation lawyer | May 04

Relationship: Other

"Mike is a strong advocate for his clients. I do not hesitate endorsing this lawyer."

Robert Lawrence Cohen headshot
Robert Cohen

Mediation lawyer | Apr 30

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. He knows his craft."

Judd S Nemiro headshot
Judd Nemiro

Unknown lawyer | Feb 26

Relationship: Other

"A highly experienced, well-rounded and compassionate attorney. I endorse this lawyer."

J. Matthew Catchick Jr. headshot
J. Catchick

Family lawyer | Feb 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I strongly endorse Mr. Haskell. He is dedicated to superior client service, and achieves excellent results. A top notch attorney!"

Evan D. Rossio headshot
Evan Rossio

Family lawyer | Feb 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this skilled and passionate attorney. A rare combination of empathy and intelligence, Mr. Haskell zealously represents his clients while guiding them through the often emotional turmoil of the divorce and/or custody matter."

Mickey David Larson headshot
Mickey Larson

Child custody lawyer | Apr 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. He is passionate about what he does, and I am confident enough in his service and in his abilities to recommend him to any client of mine."

Howard M. Fields headshot
Howard Fields

Litigation lawyer | Sep 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Michael Haskell is an articulate, courteous yet appropriately aggressive and persuasive advocate for his clients. His research and writing skills are of the highest caliber. He aims to solve problems rather than create new ones."

Jason B. Negri headshot
Jason Negri

Child custody lawyer | Aug 20

Relationship: Friend

"I have known Michael Haskell for years and know him to be highly intelligent, a zealous advocate, and a proficient family law practitioner who understands the system. These are the qualities you want in your attorney, and I endorse him."

View All Endorsements
James Brice Newell headshot
James Newell

Estate planning lawyer

Mark V. Clay headshot
Mark Clay

Immigration lawyer

Robert Lawrence Cohen headshot
Robert Cohen

Unknown lawyer

David S. Soble headshot
David Soble

Unknown lawyer

Jonathan Pierre Lacour headshot
Jonathan Lacour

Unknown lawyer

Laurie Kay Schmitt headshot
Laurie Schmitt

Family lawyer

Randall L. Velzen headshot
Randall Velzen

Family lawyer

Judd S Nemiro headshot
Judd Nemiro

Family lawyer

J. Matthew Catchick Jr. headshot
J. Catchick

Family lawyer

Evan D. Rossio headshot
Evan Rossio

General practice lawyer

Jason B. Negri headshot
Jason Negri

Business lawyer

John Walter Joyce headshot
John Joyce

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.9 (Excellent)

Honors

2014

Certified Collaborative Attorney, Collaborative Practice Institute of Michigan

2006

American Lawyers, American Lawyer

Work Experience

2008 - Present

Principal, Haskell Law, PC

2007 - 2008

Attorney, Morgan Lewis & Bockius

2006 - 2007

Attorney, Paul Hastings Janofksy & Walker, LLP

2004 - 2006

Attorney, Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver

2003 - 2004

Legal Intern (Federal Clerk), United States District Court, Western District Of Louisiana

Associations

2014 - Present

Collaborative Practice Institute of Michigan

Certified Collaborative Attorney

2014 - Present

Pink Tie Guys

Board of Directors

2014 - Present

International Academy of Collaborative Professionals

Collaborative Attorney

2013 - Present

Grand Rapids Bar Association

Member

2013 - Present

Grand Rapids Bar Association, Family Law Section

Member

2013 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

2013 - Present

American Bar Association, Family Law Section

Member

2013 - Present

Dads and Moms of Michigan

Advisory Board Member

2012 - Present

State Bar of California, Family Law Section

Attorney Member

2012 - Present

State Bar of California, Law Practice Management and Technology Section

Attorney Member

2012 - Present

State Bar of California, Solo and Small Firm Section

Attorney Member

2012 - Present

Institute for Continuing Legal Education

Partner

2012 - Present

State Bar of Michigan, Law Practice Management Section

Attorney Member

2012 - Present

State Bar of Michigan, Family Law Section

Attorney Member

2010 - Present

Michigan State Bar Foundation

Attorney Member

2003 - Present

State Bar of California

Attorney Member

2003 - 2004

United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

Federal Clerk

2001 - 2003

Michigan Journal of International Law

Editor

Sample of Legal Cases

Orlebeke v. Orlebeke

Mom (client) won on appeal.

Wilder v. Wilder (Placer County)

Favorable

See More Legal Cases

Education

2003

University of Michigan Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1999

Franciscan University of Steubenville

MBA

1997

Franciscan University of Steubenville

BA - Bachelor of Arts

1997

Franciscan University of Steubenville

A.A.

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution