Kathryn Jeanne Carlisle-Kesling

Kathryn Jeanne Carlisle-Kesling

3.9
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 26 years

Real estate Lawyer at Cleveland, OH
Practice Areas: Real Estate, Commercial, Business ... +5 more

1400 Fifth Third Center, 600 Superior Avenue East, Cleveland, OH

About Kathryn

Biography

Practice Areas

8

Practice Areas

Real Estate 40%

Residential, Commercial, Title Insurance, Escrow Services, Landlord Tenant, Construction, Liens, Condominium/Subdivision, Property Management, Represent Professionals in Real Estate Services, Surveyors, Title Agents, Architects, Developers, Property Owners, Landlords

27 years

40%
Business 10%

27 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 200-300 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Utah for 8 years

State: Utah

Acquired: 2018

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Ohio for 26 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1999

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Buckley King LPA

1400 Fifth Third Center, 600 Superior Avenue East, Cleveland, OH, 44114

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kathryn Jeanne Carlisle-Kesling's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.9 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 7 reviews

Posted by William | September 28, 2018 | Insurance

Real estate/title insurance agent client

Attorney aggressively reviewed and negotiated title claim matters. Has represented company in multiple complex real estate and title insurance litigation with excellent results. Her specialty certification has proven helpful in a niche market, of title insurance and real estate matters. Has represent...ed company in residential, commercial and judicial foreclosure matters.

Posted by anonymous | January 10, 2018 | Landlord & Tenant

Not Recommended

Kathryn Carlisle-Kesling handled my eviction case very poorly. First, she requested I delay processing the case and that I give the tenants a second 3 day notice, even though they were already clearly in breach of the lease and had already received a 3 day notice. Then, she mailed paperwork intended... for me to the tenants. I had no idea any paperwork was even sent to me or to the court, or that a court date was set until I happened to find the case information on my own on the municipal court website. When I questioned this she said that was the address they had on file for me, yet I saw her write down my current address when we met (and yet the bill made it to my actual home address!). When she finally sent me the paperwork via email, the dates and other facts in the complaint were incorrect. When I pointed this out and asked that it be corrected, she didn’t want to correct it until I pushed for it (she had another attorney correct it). While we sat in court for the hearing on count one to get them out of the house she said that after we won, if they didn't leave I should contact her a day or so before so that she could be prepared to contact the court the day after they were to be out. She also said that I would not have to pay any extra unless the tenants decided to fight count 2, which was for unpaid rent, utilities and damages. She described in detail the varioius ways of collecting, including requesting the money from the tenants bank account that they had used to pay the rent, garnishing wages, etc. We did win the judgment on count one and a date was set for the tenants to be out. But when that day approached, she told me if they didn't leave I had to handle it myself with the court. Luckily the tenants moved out. Then she said she wanted to file a default judgment for count 2 for but only against the female on the lease, and tried to talk me down on the amount owned. She asked me to scramble to get things signed and returned to her the day I was flying out on vacation, so that she could file this while I was on vacation. I did this only to return and find nothing filed, and no contact from her. When I questioned this she finally submitted the request for default judgment against the female. After the default judgment against the female was granted, and a month after filing against the female, said then she wanted to file a default judgment against the male on the lease. So again filled out the paperwork. Then a couple weeks later I got a letter stating "as I know, both default judgments were granted...." and implying that pursuing the money would be at additional charge. She did not send me copies of either of the 2 default judgments. At this point it seemed that a lot of unnecessary delays were built into the process, to the benefit of the tenants. So I sent her an email asking her to confirm in writing that neither she nor her assistant had a relationship with either of the tenants, questioned why she was sending me a termination letter when I never got copies of the 2 default judgments, and told her that I did want to pursue collecting the money but that my understanding was that it was included in what I already paid. I asked her to call me. She called me, and acted like she didn't know what my questions were. When I started to speak she would not even talk to me and said very angrily that she was terminating the relationship. Then a week later she sent me a letter with copies of the 2 default judgments and a letter stating that I terminated the relationship because I said that I "will pursue collection on the money judgment on my own"...which is completely not true - my email to her clearly stated I wanted to pursue and reminded her that she originally said that was included. I have email records to confirm all of this. I highly recommend avoiding using her for evictions

Kathryn Carlisle-Kesling

Replied last December 17, 2012

Although CKA is not able to respond with any substantial detail because of the client protection afforded under the confidentiality rules and attorney client priviledge, I want to personally apologize if your experience with CKA was not 100% satisfactory. Although this client has expressed disappointment, CKA has had much success with evictions having represented large apartment owners to single family owners. CKA stands by its lawyers and stands by its good business practices.

Posted by anonymous | April 22, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Probate

Probate Court Representation

After the sudden death of my father I contacted Ms. Carlisle-Kesling to assist in filing the necessary paperwork and representing my father's estate in Probate. First and foremost Ms. Carlisle-Kesling was very supportive during the difficult time. She handled everything with focus and professionali...sm and quickly guided me through this daunting process. I was extremely satisfied with her ability to explain the details during the Probate process and basically take care of everything with the results I wanted.

Posted by anonymous | April 14, 2016 | Estate Planning

Very disappointed

I was very disappointed and would definitely not recommend this lawyer. I found Ms. Carlisle-Kesling on this website because I was looking for an attorney located close to my mother's home who could help with a real estate/estate planning issue. One of my brothers scheduled the appointment during a w...eek when I planned to be in town. The receptionist showed us into a room, and she asked us a lot of detailed questions about the situation and then told us her opinion about how we should proceed. Then she told us we would be meeting with John Gill, rather than Ms. Carlisle-Kesling. We told Mr. Gill that we wanted to know about the pros and cons of various options to facilitate the transfer of property from my mother to my brothers and me. Mr. Gill did not seem to have any knowledge of estate planning and very little understanding of real estate law. He told us he often confused Medicare with Medicaid, and then he did so throughout our conversation. He also did not seem to understand how the Homestead Exemption works. He recommended that we call an accountant and my mom's bank for advice. When we asked about setting up a trust, he rather condescendingly said that was only for wealthy people. It was a very frustrating conversation, and not at all helpful. As we left, the receptionist told us it would cost $50 for the appointment, even though this website states that the consultation is free. Even worse than the waste of a small amount of money, though, was the complete waste of our time.

Kathryn Carlisle-Kesling

Replied last April 14, 2016

I did not meet with this individual and I am uncertain as to why Avvo permits a review on my page, despite this fact. However, as the owner of the CKA Lawfirm, I am always concerned when clients of the firm are not 100% satisfied. It is for this reason that I will gladly refund your consultation fee, if you contact the law firm, even though you met with another attorney, who has different terms of engagement. I have verified that the CKA law firm website does not reference free consultations, although in some circumstances consultations are free. For example involving bankruptcy.

Posted by Paul | September 25, 2013

Detailed and Available

I needed a lawyer that I could trust, answer all my questions, and walk me thru the legal process with clear guidance. Kathryn not only did that, but was always available either in person or by phone. I would highly recommend her and would use her again should I need a lawyer in the future.

See All Client Reviews

Kathryn Jeanne Carlisle-Kesling's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kathryn

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Eric Richard Laubacher headshot
Eric Laubacher

Divorce and separation lawyer

Amy Elizabeth Stoner headshot
Amy Stoner

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer

George Gernot III headshot
George Gernot

Criminal defense lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

2014

Certified Residential Real Property Specialist, Ohio State Bar Association

2013

2013 Rising Star, Super Lawyers Magazine

2008

Certified Residential Real Property Specialist, Ohio State Bar Association

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Owner, Carlisle-Kesling & Associates Co LPA

2006 - 2010

Partner, Carlisle-Kesling & Adamczyk Co. LPA

1999 - 2006

President, Carlisle-Kesling & Associates Co. LPA

Associations

2015 - 2017

Ohio State Bar Association, Real Property Section

Section Council

2014 - 2016

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, Real Property Section

Section Council

2011 - 2012

Independent Ohio Land Title Association

Member

2000 - 2014

American Bar Association, Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section, Commercial Leasing Group

Member

2000 - 2014

Ohio Land Title Association

Member

1999 - 2014

Ohio State Bar Association

Member

1999 - 2014

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, Real Estate Sub Committee

Member

Education

1999

University of Toledo School of Law

Juris Doctor

1996

University of Cincinnati

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

Spring Seminar

Title Ownership, Transfers, Land Sales

2015

Bradley Schaeffer Institute

Urban and Community Gardens, Leases & Conservation Easements

2012

Cleveland-Marshall Law Alumni Association

Foreclosure defense and loss mitigation

2009

The Upside of a Downturn: Financing & Leasing in a Changed Economy

Land Installment Contracts & Seller Financing

2008

Issues involving estate planning

Estate Planning Issues

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution