Free Consultation
$0 first 60 minutes
I have dedicated my career to helping the legal needs of the disadvantaged. I am academically and professionally involved in the Bar. I focus on New Deal legislation and subscribe to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's declaration that "Necessitous men are not free men." Many American employees are unable to provide for their families due to corporations terminating them without just cause. Similarly, many workers who are deprived of living wages are unable to be free. So, I represent hard working people that have fell victim to corporate greed.
1
Practice Area
Free Consultation
$0 first 60 minutes
40%-40%
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Oregon
Acquired: 2019
No misconduct found
State: Arizona
Acquired: 2018
No misconduct found
State: Kentucky
Acquired: 2015
No misconduct found
State: New York
Acquired: 2015
No misconduct found
State: Texas
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
State: Florida
Acquired: 2003
No misconduct found
333 W Vine St Ste 1200, Lexington, KY, 40507
5 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | General Knowledge
Posted by anonymous | October 02, 2023 | Lawsuits & Disputes
Rude
He refused to listen to the details of the case and outright dismissed it on the basis of the defendant. A lawyer should listen to the merits of the case, rather than say that a case is impossible just because of who the defendant is.
"I endorse this lawyer. Strong academic and writing skills, only surpassed by his first rate trial advocacy skills. Possesses a rare combination of all the skills a lawyer could need or a client could ever require."
Employment and labor lawyer
2017
Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2017
Class Graduate, Leadership Kentucky
2016
Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2015
Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2014
Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2013
Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2009 - Present
Attorney, Morgan & Morgan
2005 - 2009
Attorney, Mazaheri & Gadd
2004 - 2005
Attorney, Smith, Feddler, Smith & Miles, PA
2002 - 2004
Assistant Public Defender, Office Of The Public Defender
The court agreed with the employee that a jury must decide whether moving his work station violates USERRA.
28 U.S.C. Sec. 1445(c) prohibits removal of a workers compensation retaliation case, so the plaintiff's case was remanded back to state court.
Plaintiff was permitted to move forward on his claim for redress as there was a question of fact and law as to whether the Secretary of Labor adequately supervised a settlement.
The court granted class certification pursuant 29 U.S.C. Sec. 216(b), so all aggrieved installers and technicians would receive their notice of their rights.
The district court found material factual issues in dispute existed and the case was set trial.
Fla Constitution Provides for Cause of Action & Fla Minimum Wage Act is Unconstitutional
2002
JD - Juris Doctor
2000
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2017
You be the Juror: Voir Dire in Sex Discrimination Cases
2017
Class Arbitrability & Class Waiver
2015
Locating & Ethically Communicating with Putative Collective & Class Members
2015
Compensable Time in the Digital Age
2013
FLSA Update
2012
The Supreme Court & Section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act
2012
Wage & Hour Boot Camp
2015
Persian
Legal Answers
Do I have to hold a position for an employee who was hurt outside of work?
13 Mar 2018
Can an employer require an exempt employee to be on call 24/7 365 days per year without compensation?
13 Mar 2018
Can Walmart fire me for talking about my wages and bonus? Isn't this breaking NLRA law?
12 Mar 2018