Attorney Alexander Floyd Ransom's Legal Cases

Criminal defense

Residential Burglary (7 Counts), Theft First Degree (3 Counts) #07-1-00***-*

Apr 05, 2018

OUTCOME: Dismissed Majority of Charges & Entered DOSA Sentence With Credit for Time Served.

Client charged with seven counts of Residential Burglary under RCW 9A.52.025 and three counts of Theft First Degree under RCW 9A.56.030. All crimes are Class B felonies exposing Client to a maximum 10 ... years prison and a $20,000 fine on each count. Here, Client and other co-defendants allegedly conducted a series of numerous burglaries in Client's mobile home park. Years passed before formal charges were brought against Client. When charges were filed, Client was actually serving a prison sentence on an unrelated matter. Mr. Ransom entered favorable negotiations with Prosecutor. The resolution dismissed five of the seven Residential Burglary charges and reduced the remaining two Residential Burglaries to Burglary in the Second Degree. The resolution also dismissed all three Theft First Degree Counts. Finally, Prosecutor agreed to a favorable sentencing alternative under Washington's Drug Offender Sentencing Act (DOSA). The dismissals and downward reductions allowed Client to be given credit for prison time that he already served. Later, after his release, Client would enter drug treatment and be monitored by the Department of Corrections for 29 months. This was a highly favorable sentence under the circumstances. Client served no additional prison time even though his exposure was an additional 63-85 months on top of the prison sentence he was already serving if he was found guilty at trial.

Criminal defense

Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer #6Z6003**

Mar 12, 2018

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Client charged with Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer under RCW 9A.76.020. This crime is a gross misdemeanor punishable up to 1 year in jail and $5,000.00 fine. Here, police officers approached Cli ... ent and Client's wife at a bus station. The police officers mistakenly thought Client's wife was a drug dealer with warrants for her arrest. Officers detained Client's wife and placed her in a wrist lock. Client became agitated. Eventually, the officers realized they made a mistake regarding the identity of Client's wife. Although they released Client's wife and did not arrest her, they cited and arrested Client for Obstructing. Client drafted and argued a Knapstad Motion to dismiss. The judge granted Mr. Ransom's motion and dismissed the case.

Criminal defense

Spotlighting Big Game, Unlawful Hunting of Big Game & Shooting Firearm from Vehicle #C9450**

Mar 06, 2018

OUTCOME: Dismissal of All Charges Under Stipulated Order of Continuance (SOC)

Client was an avid hunter charged with Spotlighting Big Game under RCW 77.15.450, Unlawful Hunting of Big Game under RCW 77.15.410 and Shooting a Firearm From a Vehicle under RCW 77.15.460. Each charge ... is a Fish and Wildlife hunting violation and a gross misdemeanor punishable up to 1 year jail and a $5,000.00 fine. Here, Client allegedly shot a decoy deer from his vehicle while spotlighting the decoy deer with his headlights. Client's firearm was confiscated by the Fish & Wildlife authorities. Making matters worse, Client risked his hunting license getting suspended or revoked if he was convicted. Fortunately, Mr. Ransom negotiated a favorable resolution. Client's case was continued for 5 years under a Stipulated Order of Continuance ending in dismissal of all charges. This resolution allowed Client to re-obtain his firearm and avoid the suspension of his hunting license. He is required to avoid future criminal convictions during this period and pay $600 damages for the decoy. Client's case shall be dismissed after these requirements are met.

Criminal defense

Malicious Mischief Second Degree (DV) #16-1-012**-*

Feb 28, 2018

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Client charged with Malicious Mischief Second Degree under RCW 9A.48.080. This is a Class C felony punishable up to 5 years prison and a $10,000.00 fine. Here, Client allegedly became intoxicated and d ... amaged his ex-girlfriends car while trying to access it to recover his belongings. Making matters worse, the crime was charged as Domestic Violence (DV) crime because the two were in a dating relationship. Despite the challenges, Mr. Ransom undertook in-depth investigations. He interviewed the alleged victim twice. Both interviews showed the victim lacked credibility and was vindictive toward Client. Also, it was impossible to assess the damages to the vehicle because police never photographed the vehicle and it was sold afterward. Ultimately, Prosecutor agreed to enter a 1-year Stipulated Order of Continuance (Deferred Prosecution) which dismissed the Malicious Mischief charges in their entirety if Client paid a small restitution amount to the alleged victim. Client accepted, and was very happy for the outcome.

Criminal defense

Assault Fourth Degree #7Z1116***

Feb 26, 2018

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Client charged with Assault Fourth Degree under RCW 9A.36.041 following an altercation at a grocery store parking lot. This crime is a gross misdemeanor punishable up to a year in jail, a $5,000.00 fi ... ne and 2-5 years of active probation. Convictions can lead to loss of employment opportunities, travel restrictions and loss of firearm rights. Despite the challenges, Mr. Ransom thoroughly investigated the case. There were no independent witnesses who would testify that Client assaulted the alleged victim. Also, the alleged victims never responded to Mr. Ransom's attempts at contact. Prosecutor conducted his own investigations and determined that the victim lacked credibility. Consequently, Prosecutor dismissed the charges.

Criminal defense

Rape Second Degree Reduced to Assault Third Degree #17-1-00***-*

Feb 22, 2018

OUTCOME: Reduced Class A Violent Sex Felony to Class C Nonviolent, Non-Sex & Non-Deportable Felony Offense.

Client originally charged with RCW 9A.44.050 Rape in the Second Degree by Forcible Compulsion (Rape 2°). This is a class A felony exposing him to life in prison, $50,000.00 fine, or both. Here, even th ... ough Client has no prior felony history, being convicted exposed him to 78-102 months in prison, mandatory registration for life as a sex offender in Washington State, sexual deviancy evaluations, years of treatment, payment of court fines, restitution to the victim and, ultimately, deportation. According to police reports, Client allegedly raped an ex-girlfriend. Later, the victim underwent a sexual assault examination at the hospital. It showed significant injuries to her genitalia. The main issue was whether the sexual acts leading to the victim's injuries were consensual. After arguing numerous pretrial motions and victim interviews, Mr. Ransom effectively negotiated a highly favorable plea resolution which met Client's expectations. Client pled guilty to Assault 3°, which is a Class C nonviolent and non-sex offense felony. He did not have to register as a sex offender, undergo sexual deviancy evaluations, or live in a community custody halfway house. And although the judge ordered him to serve 3 months in jail, pay minimum court fines and undergo drug/alcohol treatment, he avoided prison and received a far shorter sentence than his potential exposure to a Rape 2° conviction. Furthermore, his Assault 3° conviction shall not trigger deportation.

Criminal defense

Negligent Driving First Degree #7Z595**

Oct 23, 2017

OUTCOME: Reduced to Civil Infraction

Client was charged with Negligent Driving in the First Degree under RCW46.61.5249. This is a simple misdemeanor punishable up to 90 days jail and a $1,000.00 fine. He allegedly exceeded the speed limit ... , failed to negotiate a turn, and struck a speed warning sign; a mailbox and a large tree. After the accident, Client admitted to law enforcement that he smoked marijuana hours before driving. Making matters worse, Client had a prior Negligent Driving conviction. Despite the challenges, Mr. Ransom worked hard for good results. There was a lack of evidence to the charges because the police officer did not seek a blood test. This opened the door for Mr. Ransom to file and argue other motions, including a Motion to Dismiss for lack of probable cause and a 3.5 Motion to suppress Client's statements to police. Ultimately, instead of arguing the motions, Mr. Ransom successfully persuaded Prosecutor to reduce the charge to Negligent Driving Second Degree. This is a civil traffic infraction and not a drug or alcohol-related riving conviction. The court imposed a $550 fine with no criminal convictions, no jail, no probation and no driver’s license restrictions.

Criminal defense

Assault Fourth Degree (DV) #7Z6017**

Oct 18, 2017

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Client was charged with Assault Fourth Degree Domestic Violence (DV) under RCW 9A.36.041. Client and his ex-girlfriend were heard arguing on a 911 call. Apparently, she placed the call during the midst ... of their argument. Police quickly appeared at the scene. By then, Client had fled the scene. Client's ex-girlfriend said Client assaulted her while they argued. Generally, a 911 call is admissible evidence at trial. Despite the challenges, Mr. Ransom's investigations showed Client's ex-girlfriend suffered from numerous personal complications which called her credibility into question. Also, she wanted the case dismissed and the No-Contact Order rescinded. Ultimately, Prosecutor dismissed. Client was extremely satisfied.

Criminal defense

Assault Fourth Degree # MC329**

Oct 10, 2017

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Client charged with Assault Fourth Degree under RCW 9A.36.041 following a "push-and-shove" incident with his neighbor. The crime is a gross misdemeanor punishable up to 1 year in jail, $5,000.00 fine, ... evaluations, No-Contact Order and probation. Mr. Ransom's investigations showed the alleged victim suffered from Dementia. Client responded in self-defense to the alleged victim's attack. Prosecutor was persuaded to dismiss the case after he interviewed the alleged victim and discovered the depths of his illness. Client was extremely happy with the dismissal outcome.

Criminal defense

Trafficking in Stolen Property First Degree #16-1-012**

Sep 21, 2017

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Client was charged with RCW 9A.82.050(1) Trafficking in Stolen Property in the First Degree. The crime is a Class B Felony which exposed him to 10 years prison and a $20,000 fine. Making matters worse, ... the charge is a crime of dishonesty which severely limited Client's career options if he was convicted. Here, Client and his friends allegedly pawned a stolen clock valued at $3,000. Client's identification was used to process the transaction. Apparently, Client was unaware the clock was stolen; a fact which the Prosecutor had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt. Despite the challenges and in lieu of the defenses, Mr. Ransom successfully persuaded Prosecutor to dismiss the charges under a Stipulated Order of Continuance (for more information, please read Mr. Ransom's Legal Guide titled "Getting Cases Dismissed Via Stipulated Order of Continuance"). Under this agreement, Client's charges shall be dismissed after 1 year if he avoids any new criminal charges, serves 30 hours of community service and pays $60 in restitution to the pawn shop. Client was extremely satisfied with the result.

Alexander Floyd Ransom's Legal Cases (153)

Residential Burglary (7 Counts), Theft First Degree (3 Counts) #07-1-00***-*

Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer #6Z6003**

Spotlighting Big Game, Unlawful Hunting of Big Game & Shooting Firearm from Vehicle #C9450**

Malicious Mischief Second Degree (DV) #16-1-012**-*

Assault Fourth Degree #7Z1116***

Rape Second Degree Reduced to Assault Third Degree #17-1-00***-*

Negligent Driving First Degree #7Z595**

Assault Fourth Degree (DV) #7Z6017**

Assault Fourth Degree # MC329**

Trafficking in Stolen Property First Degree #16-1-012**